Agent Skills: SF-AI-AgentScript Skill

>

UncategorizedID: Jaganpro/sf-skills/sf-ai-agentscript

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/Jaganpro/sf-skills/tree/HEAD/skills/sf-ai-agentscript

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for sf-ai-agentscript.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/sf-ai-agentscript/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
sf-ai-agentscript
Description
>

SF-AI-AgentScript Skill

Agent Script is the code-first path for deterministic Agentforce agents. Use this skill when the user is authoring .agent files, building finite-state topic flows, or needs repeatable control over routing, variables, actions, and publish behavior.

Start with the shortest guide first: references/activation-checklist.md

Migrating from the Builder UI? Use references/migration-guide.md

When This Skill Owns the Task

Use sf-ai-agentscript when the work involves:

  • creating or editing .agent files
  • deterministic topic routing, guards, and transitions
  • Agent Script CLI workflows (sf agent generate authoring-bundle, sf agent validate authoring-bundle, sf agent preview, sf agent publish authoring-bundle, sf agent activate)
  • slot filling, instruction resolution, post-action loops, or FSM design

Delegate elsewhere when the user is:

If the user is in Builder Script / Canvas view but the outcome is a .agent authoring bundle, keep the work in sf-ai-agentscript.


Right-Size Determinism

  • Determinism is a dial, not a destination.
  • Use Agent Script when “mostly right” is not acceptable: gates, mandatory sequencing, explicit state transitions, compliance, or drift control.
  • If a workflow is fully static and linear, use Flow or Apex instead of scripting the conversation.
  • Prefer a deterministic envelope: deterministic entry/gate → flexible middle → deterministic closeout.
  • More determinism is not automatically better. Start minimal, then harden only the parts that show routing drift, sequencing failures, or compliance risk.

Required Context to Gather First

Ask for or infer:

  • agent purpose and whether Agent Script is truly the right fit
  • Service Agent vs Employee Agent
  • target org and publish intent
  • expected actions / targets (Flow, Apex, PromptTemplate, etc.)
  • whether the request is authoring, validation, preview, or publish troubleshooting

Activation Checklist

Before you author or fix any .agent file, verify these first:

  1. Exactly one start_agent block
  2. No mixed tabs and spaces
  3. Booleans are True / False
  4. No else if and no nested if
  5. No top-level actions: block
  6. No @inputs in set expressions
  7. linked variables have no defaults
  8. linked variables do not use object / list types
  9. Use explicit agent_type
  10. Use @actions. prefixes consistently
  11. Use run @actions.X only when X is a topic-level action definition with target:
  12. Do not branch directly on raw @system_variables.user_input contains/startswith/endswith for intent routing
  13. On prompt-template outputs, prefer is_displayable: False + is_used_by_planner: True
  14. Do not assume @outputs.X is scalar — inspect the output schema before branching or assignment

For the expanded version, use references/activation-checklist.md.


Non-Negotiable Rules

1) Service Agent vs Employee Agent

| Agent type | Required | Forbidden / caution | |---|---|---| | AgentforceServiceAgent | Valid default_agent_user, correct permissions, target-org checks, prefer sf org create agent-user | Publishing without a real Einstein Agent User | | AgentforceEmployeeAgent | Explicit agent_type | Supplying default_agent_user |

Full details: references/agent-user-setup.md

2) Recommended top-level block convention

Use this order for consistency in this skill's examples and reviews:

config:
variables:
system:
connection:
knowledge:
language:
start_agent:
topic:

Official Salesforce materials present top-level blocks in differing sequences, and local validation evidence indicates multiple orderings compile. Treat this as a style convention, not a standalone correctness or publish blocker.

3) Critical config fields

| Field | Rule | |---|---| | developer_name | Must match folder / bundle name | | description | Public docs/examples should use this config field | | agent_type | Set explicitly every time | | default_agent_user | Service Agents only |

Local tooling also accepts agent_description: for compatibility, but this skill's public docs and examples should prefer description:.

4) Syntax blockers you should treat as immediate failures

  • else if
  • nested if
  • comment-only if bodies
  • top-level actions:
  • invocation-level inputs: / outputs: blocks
  • reserved variable / field names like description and label

Canonical rule set: references/syntax-reference.md and references/validator-rule-catalog.md


Recommended Workflow

Recommended Authoring Workflow

Phase 1 — design the agent

  • decide whether the problem is actually deterministic enough for Agent Script
  • model topics as states and transitions as edges
  • define only the variables you truly need

Phase 2 — author the .agent

  • create config, system, start_agent, and topics first
  • add target-backed actions with full inputs: and outputs:
  • use available when for deterministic tool visibility
  • normalize raw intent/validation signals into booleans or enums before branching; avoid direct substring checks on raw user utterances for critical control flow
  • keep post-action checks at the top of instructions: ->

Default authoring stance

  • Default to direct .agent authoring and edits in source control.
  • Use sf agent generate authoring-bundle --no-spec only when the user wants local bundle scaffolding.
  • Treat sf agent generate agent-spec as optional ideation / topic bootstrap, not the default workflow.
  • Do not route Agent Script users toward sf agent create or sf agent generate template.

Phase 3 — validate continuously

Validation already runs automatically on write/edit. Use the CLI before publish:

sf agent validate authoring-bundle --api-name MyAgent -o TARGET_ORG --json

The validator covers structure, runtime gotchas, target readiness, and org-aware Service Agent checks. Rule IDs live in references/validator-rule-catalog.md.

Phase 4 — preview smoke test

Use the preview loop before publish:

  • derive 3–5 smoke utterances
  • start preview with the start / send / end subcommands, not bare sf agent preview
  • if you use --authoring-bundle, always choose a mode explicitly: --simulate-actions or --use-live-actions
  • inspect topic routing / action invocation / safety / grounding
  • fix and rerun up to 3 times

Full loop: references/preview-test-loop.md

Phase 5 — publish and activate

sf agent publish authoring-bundle --api-name MyAgent -o TARGET_ORG --json

# Manual activation
sf agent activate --api-name MyAgent -o TARGET_ORG

# CI / deterministic activation of a known BotVersion
sf agent activate --api-name MyAgent --version <n> -o TARGET_ORG --json

Publishing does not activate the agent. For automation, prefer --version <n> --json so activation is deterministic and machine-readable.


Deterministic Building Blocks

These execute as code, not suggestions:

  • conditionals
  • available when guards
  • variable checks
  • direct set / transition to
  • run @actions.X only when X is a topic-level action definition with target:
  • variable injection into LLM-facing text

Important distinction:

  • Deterministic: set, transition to, and run @actions.X for a target-backed topic action
  • LLM-directed: reasoning.actions: utilities / delegations such as @utils.setVariables, @utils.transition, and {!@actions.X} instruction references

If you need deterministic behavior for something that is currently modeled as a reasoning-level utility, either:

  • rewrite it as direct set / transition to, or
  • promote it to a topic-level target-backed action and run that action

See references/instruction-resolution.md and references/architecture-patterns.md.


Cross-Skill Integration

Cross-Skill Orchestration

| Task | Delegate to | Why | |---|---|---| | Build flow:// targets | sf-flow | Flow creation / validation | | Build Apex action targets | sf-apex | @InvocableMethod and business logic | | Test topic routing / actions | sf-ai-agentforce-testing | Formal test specs and fix loops | | Deploy / publish | sf-deploy | Deployment orchestration |


High-Signal Failure Patterns

| Symptom | Likely cause | Read next | |---|---|---| | Internal Error during publish | invalid Service Agent user or missing action I/O | references/agent-user-setup.md, references/actions-reference.md | | invalid input/output parameters on prompt template action | Target template is in Draft status — activate it first | references/action-prompt-templates.md | | Parser rejects conditionals | else if, nested if, empty if body | references/syntax-reference.md | | Action target issues | missing Flow / Apex target, inactive Flow, bad schemas | references/actions-reference.md | | Prompt template runs but user sees blank response | prompt output marked is_displayable: True | references/production-gotchas.md, references/action-prompt-templates.md | | Prompt action runs but planner behaves like output is missing | output hidden from direct display but not planner-visible | references/production-gotchas.md, references/actions-reference.md | | ACTION_NOT_IN_SCOPE on run @actions.X | run points at a utility / delegation / unresolved action instead of a topic-level target-backed definition | references/syntax-reference.md, references/instruction-resolution.md | | Deterministic cancel / revise / URL checks behave inconsistently | raw @system_variables.user_input matching or string-method guards are being used as control-flow-critical validation | references/syntax-reference.md, references/production-gotchas.md | | @outputs.X comparisons or assignments behave unexpectedly | the action output is structured/wrapped, not a plain scalar | references/actions-reference.md, references/syntax-reference.md | | Preview and runtime disagree | linked vars / context / known platform issues | references/known-issues.md | | Validate passes but publish fails | org-specific user / permission / retrieve-back issue | references/production-gotchas.md, references/cli-guide.md |


Reference Map

Start here

Publish / runtime safety

Architecture / reasoning

Validation / testing / debugging

Examples / scaffolds

Project documentation


Score Guide

| Score | Meaning | |---|---| | 90+ | Deploy with confidence | | 75–89 | Good, review warnings | | 60–74 | Needs focused revision | | < 60 | Block publish |

Full rubric: references/scoring-rubric.md


Official Resources