Agent Skills: Argument Substitution Pattern — Example Skill

Test harness for Claude Code skill argument substitution — demonstrates capture-block pre-declaration, XML tag referencing, unintentional variable corruption in code blocks, and correct placement of shell examples in reference files. Use when verifying substitution behavior before applying a pattern to other skills, testing how arguments flow from skill invocations, or understanding the pre-declaration and reference file pattern with greet/farewell/inspect actions.

UncategorizedID: Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills/example-argument-substitution

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills/tree/HEAD/.claude/skills/example-argument-substitution

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for example-argument-substitution.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

.claude/skills/example-argument-substitution/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
example-argument-substitution
Description
Test harness for Claude Code skill argument substitution — demonstrates capture-block pre-declaration, XML tag referencing, unintentional variable corruption in code blocks, and correct placement of shell examples in reference files. Use when verifying substitution behavior before applying a pattern to other skills, testing how arguments flow from skill invocations, or understanding the pre-declaration and reference file pattern with greet/farewell/inspect actions.

Argument Substitution Pattern — Example Skill

How to Use This Skill

This skill is a living test harness for argument substitution behavior. Read it, run it, observe what happened, and extend it.

Step 1 — Read this file. Do this before running. Note what you expect to see in each section.

Step 2 — Run with 0 arguments: /example-argument-substitution

Step 3 — Run with 10 arguments: /example-argument-substitution CANARY_A CANARY_B CANARY_C CANARY_D CANARY_E CANARY_F CANARY_G CANARY_H CANARY_I CANARY_J

Step 4 — Compare. Each section states what it expects. Check whether output matches.


How to Add a New Test

When you have a hypothesis about substitution behavior — test it here before applying it anywhere else.

  1. State your hypothesis — write exactly what you expect to appear in the output
  2. Add the pattern — put it in a new section below with an **Expected with 10 args:** and **Expected with 0 args:** annotation
  3. Run with 0 args/example-argument-substitution
  4. Run with 10 CANARY args/example-argument-substitution CANARY_A CANARY_B ...
  5. Observe — does the rendered output match your hypothesis exactly?
  6. Record the finding — if the hypothesis was wrong, correct it. If it involves literal $N syntax, record the verified fact in ./references/argument-substitution-reference.md (reference files are not substituted)
  7. Only then apply the pattern to other skills

Do not document any pattern as safe without completing all 7 steps.


Compare each section below between the two runs. Some sections are intentional substitution — they should show values. Others are unintentional — they show what corruption looks like.


Capture Block (intentional substitution — should show values)

All positional args captured into named XML tags. Everything else references these tags.

<arg0>$0</arg0> <arg1>$1</arg1> <arg2>$2</arg2> <arg3>$3</arg3> <arg4>$4</arg4> <arg5>$5</arg5> <arg6>$6</arg6> <arg7>$7</arg7> <arg8>$8</arg8> <arg9>$9</arg9> <all_args>$ARGUMENTS</all_args> <arg_by_index_0>$ARGUMENTS[0]</arg_by_index_0> <arg_by_index_1>$ARGUMENTS[1]</arg_by_index_1> <arg_by_index_2>$ARGUMENTS[2]</arg_by_index_2>

Expected with 10 args: each tag holds its CANARY value. Expected with 0 args: all tags empty.


Intentional Substitution in Prose (should show values)

These are correct uses of substitution — injecting argument values directly into skill output.

The skill was invoked with first argument: <arg0> The target is: <arg1> All arguments received: <all_args>

A skill instruction that uses the value directly:

Process the file <arg1> using mode <arg0>.

Expected with 10 args: prose shows CANARY_A, CANARY_B, full CANARY string. Expected with 0 args: blanks where the values would be — still correct for a 0-arg invocation.


Intentional Substitution Combined with Command Substitution

Command substitution runs at load time; argument substitution also runs at load time. Both happen before Claude reads the skill. This line combines both:

!echo "Loaded at $(date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S') — first arg is: $0"

Expected with 10 args: timestamp + CANARY_A on the same line. Expected with 0 args: timestamp + empty string after first arg is:.


Unintentional Substitution — Code Examples (shows corruption)

This section intentionally demonstrates what corruption looks like when you write shell code examples in SKILL.md body. The variables below are consumed at load time.

A bash function you might want to document:

check_file() {
    local path=$1
    local mode=$2
    [[ -f $1 ]] && chmod $2 $1
}

Expected with 10 args: $1 → CANARY_A, $2 → CANARY_B — code is corrupted. Expected with 0 args: $1 → empty, $2 → empty — also corrupted, differently.

Brace form is equally substituted:

process() {
    echo "arg: ${1}, mode: ${2}"
}

Expected with 10 args: ${1} → CANARY_A, ${2} → CANARY_B — brace form is NOT safe. Expected with 0 args: both render empty — still corrupted.

Awk field references in single quotes are also substituted:

awk '{print $5, $1}' file.txt

Expected with 10 args: $5 → CANARY_F, $1 → CANARY_A — awk example is broken. Expected with 0 args: both disappear — single quotes provide no protection.


The Correct Pattern — Pre-Declaration + Reference File

For prose and output strings: use substitution directly (as shown in the Intentional sections above).

For code examples containing shell variables: move them to a reference file. Reference files are NOT subject to substitution and can show literal $1, ${1}, $ARGUMENTS syntax safely.

The pre-declaration pattern for routing skills:

  1. Capture args into XML tags at the very top of SKILL.md (as in the Capture Block above)
  2. Use <tagname> throughout the rest of SKILL.md — never bare $N after the capture block
  3. Put all code examples with $N in references/*.md

Routing (uses <arg0> as action — correct pattern)

flowchart TD
    Start(["Read <arg0>"]) --> Q{arg0 value?}
    Q -->|"greet"| Greet["Say hello to <arg1>"]
    Q -->|"farewell"| Farewell["Say goodbye to <arg1>"]
    Q -->|"inspect"| Inspect["Show all captured values"]
    Q -->|"(empty)"| Help["Output usage line"]
    Q -->|"(anything else)"| Unknown["Output: Unknown action. Valid: greet, farewell, inspect"]

Actions

greet

Trigger: <arg0> is greet

Output:

Hello, <arg1>!
(invoked as: <all_args>)

If <arg1> is empty, substitute world.

farewell

Trigger: <arg0> is farewell

Output:

Goodbye, <arg1>. It was a pleasure.
(invoked as: <all_args>)

If <arg1> is empty, substitute friend.

inspect

Trigger: <arg0> is inspect

Output all captured values:

arg0              = <arg0>
arg1              = <arg1>
arg2              = <arg2>
arg3              = <arg3>
arg4              = <arg4>
arg5              = <arg5>
arg6              = <arg6>
arg7              = <arg7>
arg8              = <arg8>
arg9              = <arg9>
all_args          = <all_args>
arg_by_index_0    = <arg_by_index_0>
arg_by_index_1    = <arg_by_index_1>
arg_by_index_2    = <arg_by_index_2>

Full Reference

All substitution variables, pitfall table, and verified escape evidence:

./references/argument-substitution-reference.md

<input> !`node "${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/plugins/development-harness/skills/work-backlog-item/scripts/parser/parse.mjs" "$ARGUMENTS"` </input> <user_text/>