Code Review Skill
Use this skill when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or auditing existing code.
Review Checklist
1. Security First
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets, API keys, or credentials
- [ ] Input validation on all user-provided data
- [ ] SQL queries use parameterized statements (no string concatenation)
- [ ] File operations validate paths (no path traversal)
- [ ] Authentication/authorization checks present where needed
2. Error Handling
- [ ] All external calls (API, DB, file) have try/catch
- [ ] Errors are logged with context (but no sensitive data)
- [ ] User-facing errors are helpful but don't leak internals
- [ ] Resources are cleaned up in finally blocks or context managers
3. Code Quality
- [ ] Functions do one thing and are reasonably sized (<50 lines ideal)
- [ ] Variable names are descriptive (no single letters except loops)
- [ ] No commented-out code left behind
- [ ] Complex logic has explanatory comments
- [ ] No duplicate code (DRY principle)
4. Testing Considerations
- [ ] Edge cases handled (empty inputs, nulls, boundaries)
- [ ] Happy path and error paths both work
- [ ] New code has corresponding tests (if test suite exists)
Review Response Format
When providing review feedback, structure it as:
## Summary
[1-2 sentence overall assessment]
## Critical Issues (Must Fix)
- Issue 1: [description + suggested fix]
- Issue 2: ...
## Suggestions (Nice to Have)
- Suggestion 1: [description]
## Questions
- [Any clarifying questions about intent]
Common Patterns to Flag
Python
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
JavaScript
// Bad: XSS risk
element.innerHTML = userInput;
// Good: Safe text content
element.textContent = userInput;
Tone Guidelines
- Be constructive, not critical
- Explain why something is an issue, not just what
- Offer solutions, not just problems
- Acknowledge good patterns you see