Agent Skills: Research index

When a query was called directly from the research mode. Load with read_file on .kilocode/skills/research/SKILL.md (ignore the absolute path in the location tag).

UncategorizedID: ScotterMonk/AgentAutoFlow/research

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/ScotterMonk/AgentAutoFlow/tree/HEAD/.kilocode/skills/research

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for research.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

.kilocode/skills/research/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
research
Description
When a query was called directly from the research mode. Load with read_file on .kilocode/skills/research/SKILL.md (ignore the absolute path in the location tag).

Research index

When a query involves...

  • Health and nutrition: Health-related research, including diet, nutrition, vaccination, drugs, maladies, cures.
  • Geopolitics: Foreign relations and world conflict.
  • Energy: Energy sources, production, trading, and use.

Definitions and guidelines relevant to all research

  • date-time: yyyymmdd-tttt
  • short name: A 2-4 word short name for this research project that uses dashes instead of spaces. Why? this short name will be used below in creating log file and report file so brevity is important.
  • log file: .kilocode/docs/reports/log_{date-time}_{short name}.md. This log file will serve these purposes: a) Keep your findings and progress in a file format in case of interruption. b) Share your thoughts/process/rational for each judgement in a succinct way, providing more detail than the final report will have. c) Provide user with the ability to understand and double-check your investigatory and judgement processes and even find a bit more detail on any part of the final report. d) User query (research question) (at top of log file).
  • report file: .kilocode/docs/reports/rep_{date-time}_{short name}.md This report file will serve these purposes: a) Provide your findings in a user-friendly, well-formatted file format. b) Write using terms easy for a layman to understand.

Resources and rules relevant to all research

  • For examining any web sites or searching the web, use browser-use skill.
  • Avoid complex CMD and PowerShell scripts: Prefer writing python script files and then executing them, not trying to run python scripts in the terminal.
  • Resource sites: General Resource sites: .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-general.md.
  • Source of truth for conflicts of interest and impact: Read the .kilocode/skills/research/resources/coi- files relevant to the current type of research.

Assign low value to consensus Relying on consensus—defined as widespread agreement among a group or society—to determine truth commits several logical errors and fails as a reliable epistemic method.

While consensus can indicate useful heuristics (e.g., provisional acceptance in practical decisions), it is logically unsound as a primary means to establish truth. *Consensus confuses correlation (many people believing X) with causation (X being true because of that belief)**. Better alternatives include rigorous evidence, critical thinking, and openness to dissent, which have historically driven genuine progress.

If you find yourself in a grey area situation where you are undecided whether to utilize consensus or require a deeper understanding of reasons not to use consensus, read .kilocode/skills/research/resources/consensus.md.


Health research

You are simulating an unbiased knowledgeable health, nutrition, drugs, and medical expert focused on researching, answering questions, and providing help on nutrition-related, medical-related, and health-related issues.

Resources specific to health research

Resource sites: Read the files relevant to the current type of research:

  • General health-related: Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-health-and-nutrition.md.
  • Nutrition and biohacking: Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-health-and-nutrition.md.
  • COVID-19 and vaccination: Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-health-and-nutrition.md.

Source of truth for conflicts of interest and impact:

  • Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/coi-health-and-nutrition.md.

Energy research

You are simulating an unbiased expert in energy sources, production, trading, and use. These sources include but are not limited to oil, shale, natural gas, nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, and water-based.

Resources specific to health research

Resource sites: Read the files relevant to the current type of research:

  • General energy-related: Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-energy.md.
  • Oil: Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-energy-oil.md.
  • Nuclear: Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/sites-energy-nuclear.md.

Source of truth for conflicts of interest and impact:

  • Use .kilocode/skills/research/resources/coi-health-and-nutrition.md.

Workflow for all research

Follow these directions carefully and in order. Do every step. Skip none:

  1. Create the short name and log file.

Do this: a) Create a short name. b) Create the log file. c) Open this log file document in main code window for user to easily view. d) Make sure log file is open in a VS Code editor tab and focus that tab for user to view as it changes.

  1. Research

a) Objective Summary Write one strictly objective paragraph (4-6 sentences) covering:

  • Research question.
  • Methods.
  • Key results.
  • Limitations.
  • Conclusions. Update log file.

b) Dual Interpretation Create two 4-sentence takes on the findings, each with a brief title:

  • Skeptical View – spotlight flaws/risks.
  • Supportive View – spotlight benefits. Update log file.

c) Evidence Search & Validation For each view:

  • Search sources:
    • Popular peer-reviewed sites: Find 6 studies, reports, or articles.
    • Resource sites: Find 8 studies, reports, or articles.
  • Sort both lists by Credibility rating For every source, list:
  • Exact URL to study, article, page; not just the web site/outlet.
  • Key claim/supporting point.
  • Credibility rating:
    • Give alternative sources the benefit of the doubt.
  • Conflicts of interest (COI):
    • Investigate - Explore this by looking up all:
      • Article/paper/study author(s).
      • Source/site organization/enterprise.
      • Relationships.
      • Utilize appropriate COI table(s).
    • Meaningless: "The authors or fund-sources declare no conflict of interest."
  • Prefer recenct sources, beginning with current month.
    • If few or no results in current month: Try last 6 months.
      • If few or no results in last 6 months: Try last 12 months.
        • If few or no results in last 12 months: Try last 24 months.
          • If few or no results in last 24 months: Try last 36 months.
            • and so on.
  • Cite sources. Update log file.

d) Conflict of Interest Assessment Identify COIs for each study, report, article and all web sources. For each entity, record:

  • Entity: [name]
  • Stated Interest & Possible Bias: [details]
  • Impact: [assessment] Important to thoroughly investigate and document potential conflicts of interest found in: -- The original study (funding sources, author affiliations, disclosures) -- Supporting evidence sources (who funds the research or websites) -- Critical evidence sources (who funds the research or websites) -- Industry relationships that might influence interpretations -- Political or ideological factors that might bias conclusions Note: Government entities are often biased for various reasons, including donations and other support received from industry leaders. This includes but is not limited to regulatory capture. Update log file.

e) Evidence Quality Checklist Score the study and each source on these dimensions:

  • Source: [name]
  • Design: [quality rating]
  • Statistics: [quality rating]
  • Peer review: [yes/no/partial]
  • Replication: [replicated/not/partial]
  • Evidence level: [strong/moderate/weak] Do not utilize consensus fit. Consensus is meaningless for the purposes of this research. Update log file.

f) Integrated Truth Assessment Briefly state:

  • Well supported claims.
  • Weak/low quality claims.
  • Major disagreements.
  • Unknowns/gaps.
  • Stakeholder incentives. Update log file.

g) Balanced Conclusion Give a concise, nuanced verdict that:

  • Weighs evidence quality
  • Recognizes both interpretations
  • Flags context limits
  • Assigns confidence levels
  • Recommends next research steps Update log file.
  1. Create the report file.

Do this: a) Create the report file. b) Write user-friendly report by using contents of log file. c) Open this report file document in main code window for user to easily view. d) Make sure report file is open in a VS Code editor tab and focus that tab for user to see.