Fit Scorer
Score each shortlisted creator on the typed C3 ACE creator rubric, then keep campaign-specific commercial fit in a separate prioritization matrix. The ACE result is portable and brand-independent; the commercial matrix is not an ACE score and never enters CVI.
Quick Start
Score one influencer:
Score @[handle] for [brand/campaign] and tell me if they're a good fit
Compare and rank a shortlist:
Compare and rank these influencers for [campaign]: @influencer1, @influencer2, @influencer3
Skill Contract
- Reads: brand/campaign context, target audience definition, campaign goal, and a shortlist of influencer handles (supplied by the user or carried over from
influencer-discovery). Optional prior audience profiles frommemory/influencer/audience-mapper/and competitor partner benchmarks frommemory/influencer/competitor-tracker/. For rostered creators, read partnership history and audience-stat provenance frommemory/creators/<handle-slug>.md— the creator-registry roster record — as Partnership Potential inputs. - Writes: only with explicit authorization, a report containing typed ACE results plus a separately labeled commercial-fit comparison at
memory/influencer/fit-scorer/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md. - Promotes: only with separate authorization, evidence-backed top picks and their exact ACE profile/version; never promote an unscored or provisional result.
- Done when:
- Every creator has all 12 ACE items explicitly Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A with dated evidence or a gap reason.
- The exact
ace-<goal>profile/context and deterministic scorer result are preserved; Unknown prevents an ACE total. - Any commercial-fit ranking is visibly separate from ACE and cannot override a veto or missing evidence.
- Primary next skill: competitor-tracker — benchmark your top-scored picks against the creators competitors already partner with.
Handoff Summary
Emit the standard shape from skill-contract.md §Handoff Summary Format.
Data Sources
This family needs no live integrations (Tier 1). Fit Scorer works end to end by asking the user for the inputs it scores — handles, audience targets, brand values, and any metrics they have. A connector sharpens the numbers but none is required.
~~influencer database— follower counts, audience demographics, and partnership history.~~social platform analytics— engagement rate, comment quality samples, posting cadence, growth trend.~~audience intelligence— real-vs-bot follower estimates and audience overlap with your target.- Roster record (keyless Tier 1) — prior contact, response reputation, and delivery history come from
memory/creators/<handle-slug>.mdwhen the creator is rostered (creator-registry curates it);~~CRMis an optional Tier-2 sharpener for the same history when no roster record exists.
Measured YouTube inputs (free key): for YouTube candidates, python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/connectors/youtube.py" videos @handle --limit 10 supplies the engagement-authenticity inputs directly — per-video views/likes/comments against the displayed subscriber base (views-to-subs consistency, comment rate, cadence) — so those sub-scores come from Measured numbers instead of screenshots. Free YOUTUBE_API_KEY; shortlist vetting only (ToS refuses bulk-harvesting quota). See scripts/connectors/README.md.
With zero integrations, ask the user to supply each value the scoring tables request; the framework and weighting still produce a defensible ranking. See CONNECTORS.md for the free/keyless recipe per category.
Instructions
The commercial comparison layouts live in references/scoring-templates.md. They are optional decision support, not the C3 rubric.
- Lock typed context. Declare creator target/version, goal (
awareness|engagement|conversion|brand-building), profileace-<goal>,scope: ace,assessment_time: forecast|actual, shared campaignrollup_id, observation date, platform/tier/niche cohort, and evidence window. Profile scope/goal must match context. - Freeze evidence. Use creator analytics, public observations, roster history, and cohort benchmarks with source/date/type/confidence. Missing or refused private access is Unknown, never Fail or Partial.
- Score ACE only. Evaluate A1-A4 Audience, C1-C4 Credibility, and E1-E4 Engagement from ace-creator-benchmark.md. Creator-brand fit, exclusivity conflict, cost, and campaign conversion belong to ROI.O/I, not ACE.
- Verify critical failures.
C3-ACE.A2fails only on verified real-follower rate below 70%;C3-ACE.C1on verified disqualifying conduct;C3-ACE.E2on verified bought/pod engagement. One verified veto yieldsDONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIXandfinal=min(raw,59); two or more yieldDONE/BLOCKwith no final score. Operationally hold outreach while a critical issue remains, but do not relabel the typed verdict. - Run the deterministic scorer. Follow
runtime-invocation.md, resolveAARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", verify the scorer and typed catalog, then executepython3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json>. If the standalone install lacks them, returnscore_state: NOT_SCORED/score_confidence: not_scored; do not hand-calculate a total, verdict, or persistent artifact. - Build the separate commercial matrix when requested. Use audience-to-campaign fit, content style, campaign-specific brand/category fit, commercial terms, availability, and partnership potential. Label its 1-5 total
commercial_fit_score; it is not ACE, cannot clear an ACE veto, and never enters CVI. - Rank transparently. Show ACE profile/result (or coverage/interval), critical controls, commercial fit separately, evidence confidence, and an outreach recommendation with owner/rerun condition. Do not rank an Unknown-heavy candidate as definitively superior.
- Persist only with permission. Save the report only after authorization; request separate authorization before any hot-cache promotion or creator-registry proposal.
Compact Example
User: "Compare @ecofashionista, @greenwardrobe, @sustainablesarah for our sustainable fashion brand (goal: conversion)."
Output: Each creator receives a typed ace-conversion result using the same campaign rollup_id; the separate commercial matrix explains brand/category fit and terms. A verified 55% real-follower result fails A2 and caps one-veto ACE at 59, while refused access stays Unknown and prevents a total. Persistence is offered, not assumed.
Reference Materials
- references/scoring-templates.md — all per-dimension tables, final-score rollup, comparison report, custom-weighting matrix, worked example, and tips.
- skill-contract.md — shared contract and handoff summary format.
- state-model.md — memory tiers and save-path conventions.
- CONNECTORS.md — free/keyless data recipe per connector category.
- Scoring rubric: c3-benchmark.md (CVI rollup), c3/ace-creator-benchmark.md (the ACE Creator rubric this skill emits, incl. A2/C1/E2 veto items), c3/scoring-architecture.md (weighting and cap methodology).
- Sibling skills: influencer-discovery, competitor-tracker, audience-mapper, outreach-manager.
Next Best Skill
Primary: competitor-tracker — benchmark your top-scored picks against the creators competitors already work with before you commit budget.
Alternates (same discover phase):
- influencer-discovery — if the shortlist is too thin to rank, source more candidates.
- audience-mapper — if audience-match scores are uncertain, tighten the target-audience definition first.
Termination note: Track a visited-set of skills invoked this session. If the recommended next skill has already run, stop and report the chain complete rather than re-invoking it. Stop after at most 3 hops (max-depth 3) and hand back to the user with the saved report path.
Related Skills
- influencer-discovery - Find influencers to score
- competitor-tracker - Benchmark against competitor partners
- audience-mapper - Define target audience
- outreach-manager - Contact top-scored influencers