Agent Skills: quality-review

Adversarial implementation review with triage and fix loop, tiered by role. Hard-gates on `pnpm check`, delegates initial discovery to the quality-reviewer agent (opus/xhigh) for categorized findings (Critical/High/Medium/Nice-to-Have/Approved), then triages and fixes findings — mechanical, prose-only, and gate-clearing fix-now items applied directly by the orchestrator, substantive fixes dispatched to sonnet-tier developer agents. Re-reviews and confirmations run on the lighter quality-verifier agent and verify the fix delta (carried as an inline diff, or as a precomputed diff file above 200 lines) rather than re-reviewing from scratch; after cycle 2 only fix regressions and Critical/High findings on the change re-arm the loop (new Mediums are filed as severity-carrying deferred items), so the loop converges when a re-review surfaces no new substantive findings (an all-prose/mechanical batch — the initial review's included — converges without a re-review at all) — with a soft ceiling of 5 cycles that drains the mechanical/prose lanes before asking the user how to proceed (in auto mode, a decreasing recent findings trend instead extends the ceiling once); option 3 of that prompt terminates with verdict `escalated-to-architect`. Autonomous mode via the `auto` token (prompts resolve to documented defaults; used by /auto via /start auto). Use when the user says 'review my work', 'check this implementation', 'adversarial review', 'quality review', or invokes /quality-review.