Agent Skills: Data Quality Auditor

>

engineeringID: borghei/claude-skills/data-quality-auditor

Repository

borgheiLicense: NOASSERTION
34669

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/HEAD/engineering/data-quality-auditor

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for data-quality-auditor.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

engineering/data-quality-auditor/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
data-quality-auditor
Description
>

Data Quality Auditor

End-to-end data quality (DQ) practice: define DQ dimensions, write rule-based checks, detect schema drift, monitor freshness SLAs, respond to DQ incidents, build a maturity-graded program. Tool-agnostic — works whether you use Great Expectations, dbt tests, Soda Core, Monte Carlo, custom SQL, or hand-rolled scripts.

This skill is audit-focused, not pipeline-focused. For pipeline design, ETL, Spark/dbt, see engineering/senior-data-engineer.

Core Capabilities

  • Six DQ dimensions — completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness/freshness, validity, uniqueness (plus integrity, conformity, reasonableness); at least one check per dimension at production stage.
  • DQ check catalog — five categories (volume, freshness, schema, values, distribution) of ~50 specific check patterns applied per dataset.
  • Schema drift detection — snapshot baseline schemas and diff added/removed/changed columns, types, and ordinals with severity.
  • Freshness SLA monitoring — per-table max-age budgets with alerting-ready output.
  • Incident response — severity classification (Sev1-4) and a 7-step playbook (acknowledge → quarantine → triage → contain → fix-forward → notify → post-incident) with recovery patterns.
  • Maturity & governance — a five-level maturity model and anti-pattern catalog to grade and improve a DQ program.

When to Use

| Situation | Skill applies | |-----------|---------------| | Setting up DQ from scratch on a new pipeline | Yes — start with DQ dimensions + check catalog | | Auditing existing pipelines for missing DQ | Yes — dq_check_runner.py | | Detecting schema drift in upstream sources | Yes — schema_drift_detector.py | | Monitoring freshness / SLA on data assets | Yes — freshness_monitor.py | | Responding to a DQ incident (bad data in prod) | Yes — incident response playbook | | Designing a DQ governance model | Yes — DQ maturity model | | Compliance evidence (SOC 2 PI1, GDPR, ISO 27001) | Yes — checks produce auditable artifacts | | Building data pipelines for the first time | Use engineering/senior-data-engineer first |

Clarify First

Before running the audit, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • [ ] Dataset & target — which table, pipeline, or store to audit (the data the scripts read via --data)
  • [ ] Which check — DQ rule checks, schema drift, or freshness SLA (selects dq_check_runner.py vs schema_drift_detector.py vs freshness_monitor.py)
  • [ ] Thresholds & SLAs — per-dimension pass thresholds and the freshness max-age budget (sets the pass/fail line and --max-age-min)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.

The six DQ dimensions

Industry-standard taxonomy. Every dataset should have at least one check per dimension when at production stage.

| Dimension | Question | Example check | |-----------|----------|---------------| | Completeness | Are required fields populated? | users.email IS NOT NULL — fail if > 0.1% nulls | | Accuracy | Do values match reality? | Reconciliation against source-of-truth system; sample-based human review | | Consistency | Do values agree across systems / time? | users.email in DB matches Salesforce; row count today within 5% of yesterday | | Timeliness / Freshness | Is data current to expectation? | events_table.max(event_time) is < 1h old; pipeline runs SLA | | Validity | Do values conform to format / schema / business rules? | Email regex matches; country code in ISO 3166-1; status in known enum | | Uniqueness | Are entities not duplicated? | users.user_id is unique; no two rows with same (user_id, day) |

Some teams add: Integrity (referential — FKs resolve), Conformity (matches a published standard), Reasonableness (passes basic sanity checks beyond strict validity).

The DQ check catalog

Checks group into five categories applied per dataset — Volume, Freshness, Schema, Values, and Distribution. See the category summary and the full ~50-pattern catalog in references/dq-check-catalog.md.

Tools

| Tool | Purpose | Command | |------|---------|---------| | dq_check_runner.py | Run/profile DQ checks against tabular data; per-table pass/fail/warning with value vs threshold | python scripts/dq_check_runner.py --data t.json --checks checks.json --format json | | schema_drift_detector.py | Diff a current schema against a baseline snapshot (added/removed/changed columns, types, ordinals) | python scripts/schema_drift_detector.py --baseline base.json --current cur.json | | freshness_monitor.py | Check a freshness SLA: current age vs max-age budget, alerting-ready output | python scripts/freshness_monitor.py --data t.json --column updated_at --max-age-min 60 |

All scripts: stdlib only, argparse CLI, JSON or human-readable output (see Scope re: live DB integration).

References

Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:

  • references/data-quality-dimensions.md — the 6 dimensions in depth: how to measure, threshold guidance, alerting strategy, and common pitfalls per dimension. Read when defining checks for a specific dimension.
  • references/dq-check-catalog.md — the full catalog of ~50 specific check patterns with detection heuristics and tool snippets (Great Expectations / dbt / Soda / SQL). Read when writing concrete checks.
  • references/dq-incident-response.md — the full incident playbook: severity classification, the 7-step response loop, recovery patterns (backfill, quarantine, DLQ, idempotent reprocessing, rollback), and post-incident writeup/notification templates. Read when responding to a DQ incident.
  • references/dq-maturity-model.md — the five-level DQ maturity model (L0 reactive → L4 data-as-product) and what to invest in at each level. Read when grading or planning a DQ program.
  • references/dq-workflows.md — the five end-to-end workflows (new dataset, schema drift, freshness SLA, auditing existing pipelines, post-incident improvement) with the exact script commands. Read when executing a concrete DQ task.
  • references/dq-anti-patterns.md — the catalog of DQ anti-patterns to avoid. Read when reviewing an existing DQ program for smells.

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Auditing data quality across pipelines, warehouses, and stores against the six DQ dimensions.
  • Rule-based check design, schema drift detection, and freshness SLA monitoring (tool-agnostic).
  • DQ incident response and a maturity-graded governance program.
  • Producing auditable DQ artifacts for compliance evidence (SOC 2 PI1, GDPR accuracy, ISO 27001).

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Pipeline design, ETL, dbt/Spark implementation — use engineering/senior-data-engineer.
  • Live database querying; scripts are stdlib-only and read JSON inputs or simulate. For production, integrate your DB driver of choice (psycopg / mysqlclient / google-cloud-bigquery / etc.).

Related skills

  • engineering/senior-data-engineer — pipeline design, ETL, dbt, Spark
  • engineering/observability-designer — observability for data infrastructure (adjacent to DQ)
  • engineering/chaos-engineering — DQ checks benefit from chaos testing
  • ra-qm-team/gdpr-dsgvo-expert — DQ underpins GDPR Art. 5(1)(d) "accuracy"
  • ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance-expert — SOC 2 PI1 (Processing Integrity) requires DQ controls