Transcript Fixer Skill | Agent Skills

Transcript Fixer

Two-phase correction pipeline: deterministic dictionary rules (instant, free) followed by AI-powered error detection. Corrections accumulate in ~/.transcript-fixer/corrections.db, improving accuracy over time.

What each phase is actually good at (calibration, not a rule): the dictionary shines on recurring errors — product names, common homophones, anything you've corrected before — at zero cost and zero latency. But on a fresh database, on high-quality ASR (e.g. transcripts from a strong engine like Whisper, Otter, or Feishu / Tencent-Meeting), or in specialized domains (finance, medical, legal), the dictionary often matches almost nothing — the errors that remain are proper nouns and domain terms it has never seen. There, the AI pass does essentially all the real work. Treat Stage 1 as a cheap pre-filter for known repeats, not as the primary corrector, and don't be alarmed when it changes only a handful of lines on a clean transcript.

Prerequisites

All scripts use PEP 723 inline metadata — uv run auto-installs dependencies. Requires uv (install guide).

Quick Start

# First time: Initialize database
uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --init

# Single file
uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --input meeting.md --stage 1

# Batch: multiple files in parallel (use shell loop)
for f in /path/to/*.txt; do
  uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --input "$f" --stage 1
done

After Stage 1, Claude reads the output and fixes remaining ASR errors natively (no API key needed). The full method — triage by confidence, verify-don't-guess, second pass, needs-checking list — is in Native AI Correction below; read that section as the source of truth. For a quick, clean transcript it collapses to: read the whole thing → fix the obvious errors with sed → save reusable patterns to the dictionary.

See references/example_session.md for a concrete input/output walkthrough.

Alternative: API batch processing (for automation without Claude Code):

export GLM_API_KEY="<api-key>"  # From https://open.bigmodel.cn/
uv run scripts/fix_transcript_enhanced.py input.md --output ./corrected

Core Workflow

Two-phase pipeline with persistent learning:

Initialize (once): uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --init
Add domain corrections: --add "错误词" "正确词" --domain <domain>
Phase 1 — Dictionary: --input file.md --stage 1 (instant, free)
Phase 2 — AI Correction: Claude reads output and fixes errors natively, or --stage 3 with GLM_API_KEY for API mode
Save stable patterns: --add "错误词" "正确词" after each session
Review learned patterns: --review-learned and --approve high-confidence suggestions

Domains: general, embodied_ai, finance, medical, or custom (e.g., legal, gaming) Learning: Patterns appearing ≥3 times at ≥80% confidence auto-promote from AI to dictionary

After fixing, always save reusable corrections to dictionary. This is the skill's core value — see references/iteration_workflow.md for the complete checklist.

Dictionary Addition After Fixing

After native AI correction, review all applied fixes and decide which to save. Use this decision matrix:

| Pattern type | Example | Action | |-------------|---------|--------| | Non-word → correct term | 克劳锐→Claude, cloucode→Claude Code | ✅ Add (zero false positive risk) | | Rare word → correct term | 拉行链→LangChain, 哈金费斯→Hugging Face | ✅ Add (verify it's not a real word first) | | Person/company name ASR error | 卡帕西→Karpathy, Anthropics→Anthropic | ✅ Add (stable, unique) | | Common word → context word | 争→蒸, affect→effect | ❌ Skip (high false positive risk) | | Real brand → different brand | Xcode→Claude Code, Clover→Claude | ❌ Skip (real words in other contexts) |

Batch add multiple corrections in one session:

uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --add "错误1" "正确1" --domain tech
uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --add "错误2" "正确2" --domain business
# Chain with && for efficiency

False Positive Prevention

Adding wrong dictionary rules silently corrupts future transcripts. Read references/false_positive_guide.md before adding any correction rule, especially for short words (≤2 chars) or common Chinese words that appear correctly in normal text.

Native AI Correction (Default Mode)

When running inside Claude Code, use Claude's own language understanding for Phase 2 — on high-quality ASR this is where almost all the real correction happens. Scale the effort to the transcript. A short, clean recording with no proper nouns (a quick voice memo) just needs steps 1-3 plus one obvious-fix pass; skip the verification / second-pass / subagent / needs-checking machinery below, which earns its keep on long, multi-speaker, domain-heavy, or high-stakes transcripts. Don't turn a 10-second memo into a research project.

Run Stage 1 (dictionary) on all files (parallel if multiple)
Verify Stage 1 — diff against the original. If the dictionary introduced false positives, work from the original file instead and apply your edits there
Read the entire transcript before proposing corrections — later context disambiguates earlier errors (a name garbled near the start often becomes obvious later). For large files, read in chunks but finish the whole thing before deciding anything
Triage each candidate error into one of three buckets — this triage is the part that takes judgment:
- Confident fix — non-words, obvious garbling, product-name variants you already recognize, or a homophone that's unambiguous in context (their→there where context forces it; 彭波→彭博 when every other mention already reads 彭博). Apply directly (step 5).
- Needs verification — a proper noun you can't confirm from context: a person / company / ticker / product / place name (a misheard drug name in a medical interview, a researcher's surname in a podcast, a ticker on an earnings call), or any term you can't point to a specific source for — even one you think you recognize ("I'm pretty sure" is exactly how wrong names slip in). Search it, don't guess — WebSearch, or a local grep if it's a project / personal entity. A confirmed result becomes a Confident fix; if the search can't confirm it, it drops to Uncertain. Batch these: collect the unique unknowns and look them up together, not one-by-one.
- Uncertain — you suspect an error but can't confirm it even after searching (a syllable that maps to several real entities; a structurally broken sentence). Leave the original text exactly as-is and record it in the needs-checking list (step 7). A fluent-but-wrong "fix" is harder to catch downstream than an obvious garble — silence beats a confident guess.
Apply the confident fixes efficiently:
- Global replacements (unique non-words like "克劳锐"→"Claude"): one sed -i '' with multiple -e flags
- Context-dependent (a word that's only wrong in one context, like "争"→"蒸" in a distillation discussion): sed with a longer surrounding phrase for uniqueness, or the Edit tool
- Re-grep each changed term afterward to confirm it landed and didn't hit look-alikes you meant to keep
Second pass — catch what one read missed. A single linear read reliably leaves residue: an idiom degraded into a near-homophone, a term wrong in just one spot among many correct ones, an acronym misheard as another. Always re-scan once for leftovers. For a long or high-stakes transcript, also spawn an independent subagent (Task) to re-read the corrected file cold — fresh eyes with no memory of your first pass catch what you've read past. Have it report suspected residuals with line numbers, then run each back through step-4 triage (fix / search / log). Task works when you're in the main context; if it isn't available — e.g. these instructions are themselves running inside a subagent, which can't spawn another — just do one more thorough independent re-read yourself. Never skip the second pass over a missing tool.
Emit a needs-checking list — in your chat summary to the human, not baked into the file — for everything still Uncertain: line number, the original text you left in place, what you suspect, and why you couldn't confirm it. This surfaces the few items that need a recording or source to resolve, instead of burying them or papering over them with guesses. If nothing is uncertain, say so.
Verify with diff against the file you actually edited (diff <original> <your-working-file>) — every change should trace back to a triage decision
Finalize: rename *_stage1.md → *.md, delete the original .txt
Save stable patterns to the dictionary (see "Dictionary Addition" below)
If you worked from corrected_stage1.md, strip any remaining Stage 1 false positives before finalizing

Common ASR Error Patterns

AI product names are frequently garbled. These patterns recur across transcripts:

| Correct term | Common ASR variants | |-------------|-------------------| | Claude | cloud, Clou, calloc, 克劳锐, Clover, color | | Claude Code | cloud code, Xcode, call code, cloucode, cloudcode, color code | | Claude Agent SDK | cloud agent SDK | | Opus | Opaas | | Vibe Coding | web coding, Web coding | | GitHub | get Hub, Git Hub | | prototype | Pre top |

Person names and company names also produce consistent ASR errors across sessions — always add confirmed name corrections to the dictionary.

Efficient Batch Fix Strategy

When fixing multiple files (e.g., 5 transcripts from one day):

Stage 1 in parallel: run all files through dictionary at once
Read all files first: build a mental model of speakers, topics, and recurring terms before fixing anything
Compile a global correction list: many errors repeat across files from the same session (same speakers, same topics)
Apply global corrections first (sed with multiple -e flags), then per-file context-dependent fixes
Verify all diffs, finalize all files, then do one dictionary addition pass

Enhanced Capabilities (Native Mode Only)

Intelligent paragraph breaks: Add \n\n at logical topic transitions
Filler word reduction: "这个这个这个" → "这个"
Interactive review: Corrections confirmed before applying
Context-aware judgment: Full document context resolves ambiguous errors

When to Use API Mode Instead

Use GLM_API_KEY + Stage 3 for batch processing, standalone usage without Claude Code, or reproducible automated processing.

Legacy Fallback

When the script outputs [CLAUDE_FALLBACK] (GLM API error), switch to native mode automatically.

Utility Scripts

Timestamp repair:

uv run scripts/fix_transcript_timestamps.py meeting.txt --in-place

Split transcript into sections (rebase each to 00:00:00):

uv run scripts/split_transcript_sections.py meeting.txt \
  --first-section-name "intro" \
  --section "main::<verbatim line that starts the next section>" \
  --rebase-to-zero

Word-level diff (recommended for reviewing corrections):

uv run scripts/generate_word_diff.py original.md corrected.md output.html

Output Files

*_stage1.md — Dictionary corrections applied
*_corrected.txt — Final version (native mode) or *_stage2.md (API mode)
*_对比.html — Visual diff (open in browser)

Database Operations

Read references/database_schema.md before writing any custom query — the column names are not what you'd guess. The correction columns are from_text / to_text (not wrong_term/correct_term, not original/corrected). Guessing column names is the most common way these queries fail with "no such column".

# Inspect corrections — real column names are from_text, to_text, domain
sqlite3 ~/.transcript-fixer/corrections.db "SELECT from_text, to_text, domain FROM active_corrections;"
# Count rules per domain
sqlite3 ~/.transcript-fixer/corrections.db "SELECT domain, COUNT(*) FROM active_corrections GROUP BY domain;"
# Schema version
sqlite3 ~/.transcript-fixer/corrections.db "SELECT value FROM system_config WHERE key='schema_version';"

Stages

| Stage | Description | Speed | Cost | |-------|-------------|-------|------| | 1 | Dictionary only | Instant | Free | | 1 + Native | Dictionary + Claude AI (default) | ~1min | Free | | 3 | Dictionary + API AI + diff report | ~10s | API calls |

Bundled Resources

Scripts:

fix_transcription.py — Core CLI (dictionary, add, audit, learning)
fix_transcript_enhanced.py — Enhanced wrapper for interactive use
fix_transcript_timestamps.py — Timestamp normalization and repair
generate_word_diff.py — Word-level diff HTML generation
split_transcript_sections.py — Split transcript by marker phrases

References (load as needed):

Safety: false_positive_guide.md (read before adding rules), database_schema.md (read before DB ops)
Workflow: iteration_workflow.md, workflow_guide.md, example_session.md
CLI: quick_reference.md, script_parameters.md
Advanced: dictionary_guide.md, sql_queries.md, architecture.md, best_practices.md
Operations: troubleshooting.md, installation_setup.md, glm_api_setup.md, team_collaboration.md

Troubleshooting

uv run scripts/fix_transcription.py --validate checks setup health. See references/troubleshooting.md for detailed resolution.

Next Step: Structure into Meeting Minutes

After correcting a transcript, if the content is from a meeting, lecture, or interview, suggest structuring it:

Transcript corrected: [N] errors fixed, saved to [output_path].

Want to turn this into structured meeting minutes with decisions and action items?

Options:
A) Yes — run /daymade-audio:meeting-minutes-taker (Recommended for meetings/lectures)
B) Export as PDF — run /daymade-docs:pdf-creator on the corrected text
C) No thanks — the corrected transcript is all I need

Agent Skills: Transcript Fixer

Install this agent skill to your local

Skill Files