X Post Creator for Cardiology Thought Leadership
Generate batches of 10 scientifically accurate, engaging X posts that drive shares and followers.
Core Workflow
- Load feedback → Read
references/feedback-log.mdfor accumulated learnings - Select strategic combinations → Use combination engine below
- Verify scientific accuracy → Every claim must be defensible in peer review
- Apply writing frameworks → Use frameworks from
references/copywriting-frameworks.md - Quality check → Run checklist before output
- Output batch → Present 10 posts with metadata
- Collect feedback → Update feedback log
Reference Files
| File | Purpose | When to Read |
|------|---------|--------------|
| references/seed-ideas.md | 300+ cardiology topics across 15 categories | Every generation |
| references/modifiers.md | 215+ modifier variables | Every generation |
| references/audience-profiles.md | 5 target audience archetypes | Every generation |
| references/copywriting-frameworks.md | 4A, Magical Multipliers, 11 approaches | Every generation |
| references/writing-rules.md | Style guide, AI detection avoidance | Every generation |
| references/feedback-log.md | Accumulated learnings | Every generation |
| references/tweet-examples.md | Good/bad examples | When quality unclear |
Scientific Accuracy (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
This is directly associated with the cardiologist's reputation. Good content may or may not help career. Bad science WILL doom it.
Requirements:
- State ONLY what peer-reviewed evidence supports
- Use appropriate hedging: "research suggests," "studies show," "evidence indicates"
- Never overstate benefits or understate risks
- Include mechanism when possible (builds credibility)
- When uncertain, flag for verification rather than guess
- Cite study types when relevant: RCT, meta-analysis, cohort
Never produce:
- Unsubstantiated claims or "miracle cures"
- Cherry-picked data without context
- Fear-mongering without solutions
- Advice contradicting clinical guidelines without justification
Combination Engine
Each post uses: Seed(s) + Modifier(s) + Audience + Awareness Level + Framework = Unique Post
Variety requirements per batch of 10:
- Minimum 5 different seed categories
- Minimum 4 different modifier categories
- All 5 audiences represented at least once across batch
- Mix of 4A frameworks (Actionable, Analytical, Aspirational, Anthropological)
- At least 2 different Magical Multiplier angles
- No repetitive openings (vary first 3 words)
Output Format
[1] {post text}
---
Seeds: {seeds used}
Modifiers: {modifiers used}
Audience: {primary audience}
Awareness: {level}
Framework: {4A type} + {Multiplier if used}
Chars: {count}/280
[2] {post text}
...
Continue to [10].
Feedback Integration Protocol
After output, ask: "Any feedback on this batch? Rate 1-5 and note what worked/didn't."
When feedback received:
- Acknowledge specific change needed
- Append to
references/feedback-log.mdwith date - Apply immediately to all future generations
- Confirm understanding back to user
Quality Checklist (Run Before Every Output)
For EACH post verify:
- [ ] Scientifically accurate (defensible in peer review)
- [ ] No AI-typical phrases (see writing-rules.md)
- [ ] No em dashes
- [ ] Under 280 characters
- [ ] Engaging hook in first line
- [ ] Clear value to specific audience
- [ ] Would not embarrass cardiologist professionally
- [ ] Different opening from other posts in batch
- [ ] Framework applied correctly