<!-- SYNC:understand-code-first -->[IMPORTANT] Use
TaskCreateto break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
<!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first -->Understand Code First — HARD-GATE: Do NOT write, plan, or fix until you READ existing code.
- Search 3+ similar patterns (
grep/glob) — citefile:lineevidence- Read existing files in target area — understand structure, base classes, conventions
- Run
python .claude/scripts/code_graph trace <file> --direction both --jsonwhen.code-graph/graph.dbexists- Map dependencies via
connectionsorcallers_of— know what depends on your target- Write investigation to
.ai/workspace/analysis/for non-trivial tasks (3+ files)- Re-read analysis file before implementing — never work from memory alone
- NEVER invent new patterns when existing ones work — match exactly or document deviation
BLOCKED until:
- [ ]Read target files- [ ]Grep 3+ patterns- [ ]Graph trace (if graph.db exists)- [ ]Assumptions verified with evidence
docs/project-reference/domain-entities-reference.md— Domain entity catalog, relationships, cross-service sync (read when task involves business entities/models) (content auto-injected by hook — check for [Injected: ...] header before reading)docs/test-specs/— Test specifications by module (read existing TCs; generate/update test specs via/tdd-specafter implementation)
<!-- /SYNC:plan-quality --> <!-- SYNC:rationalization-prevention -->Plan Quality — Every plan phase MUST ATTENTION include test specifications.
- Add
## Test Specificationssection with TC-{FEAT}-{NNN} IDs to every phase file- Map every functional requirement to ≥1 TC (or explicit
TBDwith rationale)- TC IDs follow
TC-{FEATURE}-{NNN}format — reference by ID, never embed full content- Before any new workflow step: call
TaskListand re-read the phase file- On context compaction: call
TaskListFIRST — never create duplicate tasks- Verify TC satisfaction per phase before marking complete (evidence must be
file:line, not TBD)Mode: TDD-first → reference existing TCs with
Evidence: TBD. Implement-first → use TBD →/tdd-specfills after.
<!-- /SYNC:rationalization-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions -->Rationalization Prevention — AI skips steps via these evasions. Recognize and reject:
| Evasion | Rebuttal | | ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | | "Too simple for a plan" | Simple + wrong assumptions = wasted time. Plan anyway. | | "I'll test after" | RED before GREEN. Write/verify test first. | | "Already searched" | Show grep evidence with
file:line. No proof = no search. | | "Just do it" | Still need TaskCreate. Skip depth, never skip tracking. | | "Just a small fix" | Small fix in wrong location cascades. Verify file:line first. | | "Code is self-explanatory" | Future readers need evidence trail. Document anyway. | | "Combine steps to save time" | Combined steps dilute focus. Each step has distinct purpose. |
<!-- /SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions -->Red Flag Stop Conditions — STOP and escalate to user via AskUserQuestion when:
- Confidence drops below 60% on any critical decision
- Changes would affect >20 files (blast radius too large)
- Cross-service boundary is being crossed
- Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, PII handling)
- Breaking change detected (interface, API contract, DB schema)
- Test coverage would decrease after changes
- Approach requires technology/pattern not in the project
NEVER proceed past a red flag without explicit user approval.
Skill Variant: Variant of
/cook— parallel multi-task implementation with subagents.
Quick Summary
Goal: Implement multiple independent tasks simultaneously using parallel fullstack-developer subagents.
Workflow:
- Plan — Create plan with parallel phases and strict file ownership
- Dispatch — Launch fullstack-developer subagents per phase
- Merge — Integrate all changes and verify
- Review — Run code-simplifier and review-changes
Key Rules:
- Phases must have non-overlapping file ownership
- User approval required before dispatching subagents
- Break work into todo tasks; add final self-review task
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Execute these tasks in parallel for maximum efficiency: <tasks>$ARGUMENTS</tasks>
Mode: PARALLEL - Multiple subagents working concurrently.
Workflow
1. Task Decomposition
- Analyze tasks for independence
- Group into parallelizable work units
- Identify dependencies between units
- Create dependency graph
- External Memory: Write task analysis to
.ai/workspace/analysis/{task-name}.analysis.md. Re-read before parallel dispatch.
2. Parallel Research (if needed)
Launch multiple researcher subagents simultaneously:
Task A research ──┐
Task B research ──┼──► Synthesis
Task C research ──┘
3. Parallel Planning
- Use
plannersubagent with synthesized research - Create plan with parallel-safe phases
- Mark file ownership boundaries (prevent conflicts)
4. Parallel Implementation
Launch multiple fullstack-developer subagents:
Phase 1 (Backend API) ──┐
Phase 2 (Frontend UI) ──┼──► Integration
Phase 3 (Tests) ──┘
Critical: Each subagent must stay within file ownership boundaries.
5. Integration & Testing
- Merge parallel outputs
- Use
testersubagent for integration tests - Use
debuggerif integration issues found
6. Review & Report
- Use
code-reviewerfor final review - Consolidate all changes
- Report to user
Parallelization Rules
| Rule | Description | | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | | File Ownership | Each subagent owns specific files - no overlap | | Dependency Order | Respect dependency graph | | Max Concurrent | 3 subagents max to prevent conflicts | | Sync Points | Integration checkpoints between phases |
When to Use
- Multi-component features (backend + frontend)
- Large refactoring across independent modules
- Parallel test writing
- Documentation updates alongside code
Example Task Split
"Add user authentication with login UI"
├── Backend API (subagent 1)
│ ├── auth-controller.ts
│ └── auth-service.ts
├── Frontend UI (subagent 2)
│ ├── login-page.component.ts
│ └── login-form.component.ts
└── Tests (subagent 3)
├── auth.spec.ts
└── login.e2e.ts
Trade-offs
| Aspect | Parallel | Sequential | | ------------ | -------------------- | ---------- | | Speed | ~2-3x faster | Baseline | | Coordination | Higher complexity | Simple | | Conflicts | Risk of merge issues | None | | Context | Split across agents | Unified |
Next Steps (Standalone: MUST ATTENTION ask user via AskUserQuestion. Skip if inside workflow.)
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS: If this skill was called outside a workflow, you MUST ATTENTION use
AskUserQuestionto present these options. Do NOT skip because the task seems "simple" or "obvious" — the user decides:
- "Proceed with full workflow (Recommended)" — I'll detect the best workflow to continue from here (feature implemented). This ensures review, testing, and docs steps aren't skipped.
- "/code-simplifier" — Simplify and clean up implementation
- "/workflow-review-changes" — Review changes before commit
- "Skip, continue manually" — user decides
If already inside a workflow, skip — the workflow handles sequencing.
Closing Reminders
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using
TaskCreateBEFORE starting - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite
file:lineevidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act) - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate decisions with user via
AskUserQuestion— never auto-decide MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting: <!-- SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder --> - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search 3+ existing patterns and read code BEFORE any modification. Run graph trace when graph.db exists. <!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:plan-quality:reminder -->
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION include
## Test Specificationswith TC IDs per phase. CallTaskListbefore creating new tasks. <!-- /SYNC:plan-quality:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:rationalization-prevention:reminder --> - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION follow ALL steps regardless of perceived simplicity. "Too simple to plan" is an evasion, not a reason. <!-- /SYNC:rationalization-prevention:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions:reminder -->
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION STOP after 3 failed fix attempts. Report all attempts, ask user before continuing. <!-- /SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions:reminder -->