Agent Skills: cook-parallel

[Implementation] ⚡⚡⚡ Parallel implementation - multiple tasks simultaneously

UncategorizedID: duc01226/easyplatform/cook-parallel

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform/tree/HEAD/.claude/skills/cook-parallel

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for cook-parallel.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

.claude/skills/cook-parallel/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
cook-parallel
Description
'[Implementation] Parallel implementation - multiple tasks simultaneously'

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

<!-- SYNC:understand-code-first -->

Understand Code First — HARD-GATE: Do NOT write, plan, or fix until you READ existing code.

  1. Search 3+ similar patterns (grep/glob) — cite file:line evidence
  2. Read existing files in target area — understand structure, base classes, conventions
  3. Run python .claude/scripts/code_graph trace <file> --direction both --json when .code-graph/graph.db exists
  4. Map dependencies via connections or callers_of — know what depends on your target
  5. Write investigation to .ai/workspace/analysis/ for non-trivial tasks (3+ files)
  6. Re-read analysis file before implementing — never work from memory alone
  7. NEVER invent new patterns when existing ones work — match exactly or document deviation

BLOCKED until: - [ ] Read target files - [ ] Grep 3+ patterns - [ ] Graph trace (if graph.db exists) - [ ] Assumptions verified with evidence

<!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first -->
  • docs/project-reference/domain-entities-reference.md — Domain entity catalog, relationships, cross-service sync (read when task involves business entities/models) (content auto-injected by hook — check for [Injected: ...] header before reading)
  • docs/test-specs/ — Test specifications by module (read existing TCs; generate/update test specs via /tdd-spec after implementation)
<!-- SYNC:plan-quality -->

Plan Quality — Every plan phase MUST ATTENTION include test specifications.

  1. Add ## Test Specifications section with TC-{FEAT}-{NNN} IDs to every phase file
  2. Map every functional requirement to ≥1 TC (or explicit TBD with rationale)
  3. TC IDs follow TC-{FEATURE}-{NNN} format — reference by ID, never embed full content
  4. Before any new workflow step: call TaskList and re-read the phase file
  5. On context compaction: call TaskList FIRST — never create duplicate tasks
  6. Verify TC satisfaction per phase before marking complete (evidence must be file:line, not TBD)

Mode: TDD-first → reference existing TCs with Evidence: TBD. Implement-first → use TBD → /tdd-spec fills after.

<!-- /SYNC:plan-quality --> <!-- SYNC:rationalization-prevention -->

Rationalization Prevention — AI skips steps via these evasions. Recognize and reject:

| Evasion | Rebuttal | | ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | | "Too simple for a plan" | Simple + wrong assumptions = wasted time. Plan anyway. | | "I'll test after" | RED before GREEN. Write/verify test first. | | "Already searched" | Show grep evidence with file:line. No proof = no search. | | "Just do it" | Still need TaskCreate. Skip depth, never skip tracking. | | "Just a small fix" | Small fix in wrong location cascades. Verify file:line first. | | "Code is self-explanatory" | Future readers need evidence trail. Document anyway. | | "Combine steps to save time" | Combined steps dilute focus. Each step has distinct purpose. |

<!-- /SYNC:rationalization-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions -->

Red Flag Stop Conditions — STOP and escalate to user via AskUserQuestion when:

  1. Confidence drops below 60% on any critical decision
  2. Changes would affect >20 files (blast radius too large)
  3. Cross-service boundary is being crossed
  4. Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, PII handling)
  5. Breaking change detected (interface, API contract, DB schema)
  6. Test coverage would decrease after changes
  7. Approach requires technology/pattern not in the project

NEVER proceed past a red flag without explicit user approval.

<!-- /SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions -->

Skill Variant: Variant of /cook — parallel multi-task implementation with subagents.

Quick Summary

Goal: Implement multiple independent tasks simultaneously using parallel fullstack-developer subagents.

Workflow:

  1. Plan — Create plan with parallel phases and strict file ownership
  2. Dispatch — Launch fullstack-developer subagents per phase
  3. Merge — Integrate all changes and verify
  4. Review — Run code-simplifier and review-changes

Key Rules:

  • Phases must have non-overlapping file ownership
  • User approval required before dispatching subagents
  • Break work into todo tasks; add final self-review task

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Execute these tasks in parallel for maximum efficiency: <tasks>$ARGUMENTS</tasks>

Mode: PARALLEL - Multiple subagents working concurrently.

Workflow

1. Task Decomposition

  • Analyze tasks for independence
  • Group into parallelizable work units
  • Identify dependencies between units
  • Create dependency graph
  • External Memory: Write task analysis to .ai/workspace/analysis/{task-name}.analysis.md. Re-read before parallel dispatch.

2. Parallel Research (if needed)

Launch multiple researcher subagents simultaneously:

Task A research ──┐
Task B research ──┼──► Synthesis
Task C research ──┘

3. Parallel Planning

  • Use planner subagent with synthesized research
  • Create plan with parallel-safe phases
  • Mark file ownership boundaries (prevent conflicts)

4. Parallel Implementation

Launch multiple fullstack-developer subagents:

Phase 1 (Backend API) ──┐
Phase 2 (Frontend UI) ──┼──► Integration
Phase 3 (Tests)       ──┘

Critical: Each subagent must stay within file ownership boundaries.

5. Integration & Testing

  • Merge parallel outputs
  • Use tester subagent for integration tests
  • Use debugger if integration issues found

6. Review & Report

  • Use code-reviewer for final review
  • Consolidate all changes
  • Report to user

Parallelization Rules

| Rule | Description | | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | | File Ownership | Each subagent owns specific files - no overlap | | Dependency Order | Respect dependency graph | | Max Concurrent | 3 subagents max to prevent conflicts | | Sync Points | Integration checkpoints between phases |

When to Use

  • Multi-component features (backend + frontend)
  • Large refactoring across independent modules
  • Parallel test writing
  • Documentation updates alongside code

Example Task Split

"Add user authentication with login UI"
├── Backend API (subagent 1)
│   ├── auth-controller.ts
│   └── auth-service.ts
├── Frontend UI (subagent 2)
│   ├── login-page.component.ts
│   └── login-form.component.ts
└── Tests (subagent 3)
    ├── auth.spec.ts
    └── login.e2e.ts

Trade-offs

| Aspect | Parallel | Sequential | | ------------ | -------------------- | ---------- | | Speed | ~2-3x faster | Baseline | | Coordination | Higher complexity | Simple | | Conflicts | Risk of merge issues | None | | Context | Split across agents | Unified |


Next Steps (Standalone: MUST ATTENTION ask user via AskUserQuestion. Skip if inside workflow.)

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS: If this skill was called outside a workflow, you MUST ATTENTION use AskUserQuestion to present these options. Do NOT skip because the task seems "simple" or "obvious" — the user decides:

  • "Proceed with full workflow (Recommended)" — I'll detect the best workflow to continue from here (feature implemented). This ensures review, testing, and docs steps aren't skipped.
  • "/code-simplifier" — Simplify and clean up implementation
  • "/workflow-review-changes" — Review changes before commit
  • "Skip, continue manually" — user decides

If already inside a workflow, skip — the workflow handles sequencing.

Closing Reminders

  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate decisions with user via AskUserQuestion — never auto-decide MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting: <!-- SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder -->
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search 3+ existing patterns and read code BEFORE any modification. Run graph trace when graph.db exists. <!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:plan-quality:reminder -->
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION include ## Test Specifications with TC IDs per phase. Call TaskList before creating new tasks. <!-- /SYNC:plan-quality:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:rationalization-prevention:reminder -->
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION follow ALL steps regardless of perceived simplicity. "Too simple to plan" is an evasion, not a reason. <!-- /SYNC:rationalization-prevention:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions:reminder -->
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION STOP after 3 failed fix attempts. Report all attempts, ask user before continuing. <!-- /SYNC:red-flag-stop-conditions:reminder -->