<!-- CODEX:PROJECT-REFERENCE-LOADING:START -->Codex compatibility note:
- Invoke repository skills with
$skill-namein Codex; this mirrored copy rewrites legacy Claude/skill-namereferences.- Prefer the
plan-hardskill for planning guidance in this Codex mirror.- Task tracker mandate: BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all steps and keep it synchronized as progress changes.
- User-question prompts mean to ask the user directly in Codex.
- Ignore Claude-specific mode-switch instructions when they appear.
- Strict execution contract: when a user explicitly invokes a skill, execute that skill protocol as written.
- Subagent authorization: when a skill is user-invoked or AI-detected and its protocol requires subagents, that skill activation authorizes use of the required
spawn_agentsubagent(s) for that task.- Do not skip, reorder, or merge protocol steps unless the user explicitly approves the deviation first.
- For workflow skills, execute each listed child-skill step explicitly and report step-by-step evidence.
- If a required step/tool cannot run in this environment, stop and ask the user before adapting.
Codex Project-Reference Loading (No Hooks)
Codex does not receive Claude hook-based doc injection. When coding, planning, debugging, testing, or reviewing, open project docs explicitly using this routing.
Always read:
docs/project-config.json(project-specific paths, commands, modules, and workflow/test settings)docs/project-reference/docs-index-reference.md(routes to the fulldocs/project-reference/*catalog)docs/project-reference/lessons.md(always-on guardrails and anti-patterns)
Situation-based docs:
- Backend/CQRS/API/domain/entity changes:
backend-patterns-reference.md,domain-entities-reference.md,project-structure-reference.md - Frontend/UI/styling/design-system:
frontend-patterns-reference.md,scss-styling-guide.md,design-system/README.md - Spec/test-case planning or TC mapping:
feature-docs-reference.md - Integration test implementation/review:
integration-test-reference.md - E2E test implementation/review:
e2e-test-reference.md - Code review/audit work:
code-review-rules.mdplus domain docs above based on changed files
Do not read all docs blindly. Start from docs-index-reference.md, then open only relevant files for the task.
Quick Summary
Goal: Deploy and manage cloud infrastructure across Cloudflare (Workers, R2, D1), Docker containers, and Google Cloud Platform.
Workflow:
- Platform Selection — Choose Cloudflare (edge/low-latency), Docker (containers/microservices), or GCP (enterprise/K8s)
- Project Setup — Initialize with Wrangler CLI, Dockerfile, or gcloud CLI
- Local Development — Test locally before deploying
- Deploy & Verify — Deploy to target platform with health checks
Key Rules:
- Run containers as non-root user; scan images for vulnerabilities
- Use multi-stage Docker builds to minimize image size
- Store secrets in environment variables, never in code
- Use R2 over S3 when zero egress cost matters
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
DevOps Skill
Comprehensive guide for deploying and managing cloud infrastructure across Cloudflare edge platform, Docker containerization, and Google Cloud Platform.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Deploying serverless applications to Cloudflare Workers
- Containerizing applications with Docker
- Managing Google Cloud infrastructure with gcloud CLI
- Setting up CI/CD pipelines across platforms
- Optimizing cloud infrastructure costs
- Implementing multi-region deployments
- Building edge-first architectures
- Managing container orchestration with Kubernetes
- Configuring cloud storage solutions (R2, Cloud Storage)
- Automating infrastructure with scripts and IaC
Platform Selection Guide
When to Use Cloudflare
Best For:
- Edge-first applications with global distribution
- Ultra-low latency requirements (<50ms)
- Static sites with serverless functions
- Zero egress cost scenarios (R2 storage)
- WebSocket/real-time applications (Durable Objects)
- AI/ML at the edge (Workers AI)
Key Products:
- Workers (serverless functions)
- R2 (object storage, S3-compatible)
- D1 (SQLite database with global replication)
- KV (key-value store)
- Pages (static hosting + functions)
- Durable Objects (stateful compute)
- Browser Rendering (headless browser automation)
Cost Profile: Pay-per-request, generous free tier, zero egress fees
When to Use Docker
Best For:
- Local development consistency
- Microservices architectures
- Multi-language stack applications
- Traditional VPS/VM deployments
- Kubernetes orchestration
- CI/CD build environments
- Database containerization (dev/test)
Key Capabilities:
- Application isolation and portability
- Multi-stage builds for optimization
- Docker Compose for multi-container apps
- Volume management for data persistence
- Network configuration and service discovery
- Cross-platform compatibility (amd64, arm64)
Cost Profile: Infrastructure cost only (compute + storage)
When to Use Google Cloud
Best For:
- Enterprise-scale applications
- Data analytics and ML pipelines (BigQuery, Vertex AI)
- Hybrid/multi-cloud deployments
- Kubernetes at scale (GKE)
- Managed databases (Cloud SQL, Firestore, Spanner)
- Complex IAM and compliance requirements
Key Services:
- Compute Engine (VMs)
- GKE (managed Kubernetes)
- Cloud Run (containerized serverless)
- App Engine (PaaS)
- Cloud Storage (object storage)
- Cloud SQL (managed databases)
Cost Profile: Varied pricing, sustained use discounts, committed use contracts
Quick Start
Cloudflare Workers
# Install Wrangler CLI
npm install -g wrangler
# Create and deploy Worker
wrangler init my-worker
cd my-worker
wrangler deploy
See: references/cloudflare-workers-basics.md
Docker Container
# Create Dockerfile
cat > Dockerfile <<EOF
FROM node:20-alpine
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --production
COPY . .
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["node", "server.js"]
EOF
# Build and run
docker build -t myapp .
docker run -p 3000:3000 myapp
See: references/docker-basics.md
Google Cloud Deployment
# Install and authenticate
curl https://sdk.cloud.google.com | bash
gcloud init
gcloud auth login
# Deploy to Cloud Run
gcloud run deploy my-service \
--image gcr.io/project/image \
--region us-central1
See: references/gcloud-platform.md
Reference Navigation
Cloudflare Platform
cloudflare-platform.md- Edge computing overview, key componentscloudflare-workers-basics.md- Getting started, handler types, basic patternscloudflare-workers-advanced.md- Advanced patterns, performance, optimizationcloudflare-workers-apis.md- Runtime APIs, bindings, integrationscloudflare-r2-storage.md- R2 object storage, S3 compatibility, best practicescloudflare-d1-kv.md- D1 SQLite database, KV store, use casesbrowser-rendering.md- Puppeteer/Playwright automation on Cloudflare
Docker Containerization
docker-basics.md- Core concepts, Dockerfile, images, containersdocker-compose.md- Multi-container apps, networking, volumes
Google Cloud Platform
gcloud-platform.md- GCP overview, gcloud CLI, authenticationgcloud-services.md- Compute Engine, GKE, Cloud Run, App Engine
Python Utilities
scripts/cloudflare-deploy.py- Automate Cloudflare Worker deploymentsscripts/docker-optimize.py- Analyze and optimize Dockerfiles
Common Workflows
Edge + Container Hybrid
# Cloudflare Workers (API Gateway)
# -> Docker containers on Cloud Run (Backend Services)
# -> R2 (Object Storage)
# Benefits:
# - Edge caching and routing
# - Containerized business logic
# - Global distribution
Multi-Stage Docker Build
# Build stage
FROM node:20-alpine AS build
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci
COPY . .
RUN npm run build
# Production stage
FROM node:20-alpine
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=build /app/dist ./dist
COPY --from=build /app/node_modules ./node_modules
USER node
CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"]
CI/CD Pipeline Pattern
# 1. Build: Docker multi-stage build
# 2. Test: Run tests in container
# 3. Push: Push to registry (GCR, Docker Hub)
# 4. Deploy: Deploy to Cloudflare Workers / Cloud Run
# 5. Verify: Health checks and smoke tests
Best Practices
Security
- Run containers as non-root user
- Use service account impersonation (GCP)
- Store secrets in environment variables, not code
- Scan images for vulnerabilities (Docker Scout)
- Use API tokens with minimal permissions
Performance
- Multi-stage Docker builds to reduce image size
- Edge caching with Cloudflare KV
- Use R2 for zero egress cost storage
- Implement health checks for containers
- Set appropriate timeouts and resource limits
Cost Optimization
- Use Cloudflare R2 instead of S3 for large egress
- Implement caching strategies (edge + KV)
- Right-size container resources
- Use sustained use discounts (GCP)
- Monitor usage with cloud provider dashboards
Development
- Use Docker Compose for local development
- Wrangler dev for local Worker testing
- Named gcloud configurations for multi-environment
- Version control infrastructure code
- Implement automated testing in CI/CD
Decision Matrix
| Need | Choose | | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | | Sub-50ms latency globally | Cloudflare Workers | | Large file storage (zero egress) | Cloudflare R2 | | SQL database (global reads) | Cloudflare D1 | | Containerized workloads | Docker + Cloud Run/GKE | | Enterprise Kubernetes | GKE | | Managed relational DB | Cloud SQL | | Static site + API | Cloudflare Pages | | WebSocket/real-time | Cloudflare Durable Objects | | ML/AI pipelines | GCP Vertex AI | | Browser automation | Cloudflare Browser Rendering |
Resources
- Cloudflare Docs: https://developers.cloudflare.com
- Docker Docs: https://docs.docker.com
- GCP Docs: https://cloud.google.com/docs
- Wrangler CLI: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/wrangler/
- gcloud CLI: https://cloud.google.com/sdk/gcloud
Implementation Checklist
Cloudflare Workers
- [ ] Install Wrangler CLI
- [ ] Create Worker project
- [ ] Configure wrangler.toml (bindings, routes)
- [ ] Test locally with
wrangler dev - [ ] Deploy with
wrangler deploy
Docker
- [ ] Write Dockerfile with multi-stage builds
- [ ] Create .dockerignore file
- [ ] Test build locally
- [ ] Push to registry
- [ ] Deploy to target platform
Google Cloud
- [ ] Install gcloud CLI
- [ ] Authenticate with service account
- [ ] Create project and enable APIs
- [ ] Configure IAM permissions
- [ ] Deploy and monitor resources
Related
databasesapi-design
<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->[IMPORTANT] Use task tracking to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.
<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->Closing Reminders
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using task tracking BEFORE starting
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite
file:lineevidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act) - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using task tracking.
<!-- CODEX:SYNC-PROMPT-PROTOCOLS:START -->Hookless Prompt Protocol Mirror (Auto-Synced)
Source: .claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs + .claude/.ck.json
[WORKFLOW-EXECUTION-PROTOCOL] [BLOCKING] Workflow Execution Protocol — MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST CRITICAL. Do not skip for any reason.
- DETECT: Match prompt against workflow catalog
- ANALYZE: Find best-match workflow AND evaluate if a custom step combination would fit better
- ASK (REQUIRED FORMAT): Use a direct user question with this structure:
- Question: "Which workflow do you want to activate?"
- Option 1: "Activate [BestMatch Workflow] (Recommended)"
- Option 2: "Activate custom workflow: [step1 → step2 → ...]" (include one-line rationale)
- ACTIVATE (if confirmed): Call
$workflow-start <workflowId>for standard; sequence custom steps manually - CREATE TASKS: task tracking for ALL workflow steps
- EXECUTE: Follow each step in sequence [CRITICAL-THINKING-MINDSET] Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination principle: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination. AI Attention principle (Primacy-Recency): Put the 3 most critical rules at both top and bottom of long prompts/protocols so instruction adherence survives long context windows.
Learned Lessons
Lessons Learned
[CRITICAL] Hard-won project debugging/architecture rules. MUST ATTENTION apply BEFORE forming hypothesis or writing code.
Quick Summary
Goal: Prevent recurrence of known failure patterns — debugging, architecture, naming, AI orchestration, environment.
Top Rules (apply always):
- MUST ATTENTION verify ALL preconditions (config, env, DB names, DI regs) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis
- MUST ATTENTION fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom sites with caller-specific defensive code
- MUST ATTENTION use
ExecuteInjectScopedAsyncfor parallel async + repo/UoW — NEVERExecuteUowTask - MUST ATTENTION name by PURPOSE not CONTENT — adding member forces rename = abstraction broken
- MUST ATTENTION persist sub-agent findings incrementally after each file — NEVER batch at end
- MUST ATTENTION Windows bash: verify Python alias (
where python/where py) — NEVER assumepython/python3resolves
Debugging & Root Cause Reasoning
- [2026-04-11] Holistic-first: verify environment before code. Failure → list ALL preconditions (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI regs, credentials, permissions, data prerequisites) → verify each via evidence (grep/cat/query) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis. Worst rabbit holes: diving nearest layer while bug sits elsewhere — e.g., hours debugging "sync timeout", real cause: test appsettings pointing wrong DB. ALWAYS cheapest check first.
- [2026-04-01] Ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace: bug caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling)? Fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom site masking real issue.
- [2026-04-01] Trace data lifecycle, not error site. Follow data: creation → transformation → consumption. Bug usually where data created wrong, not consumed.
- [2026-04-01] Code caller-agnostic. Functions/handlers/consumers don't know who invokes them. Comments/guards/messages describe business intent — NEVER reference specific callers (tests, seeders, scripts).
Architecture Invariants
- [2026-05-09] User name materialization MUST ATTENTION go through
User.UpdateName(firstName, middleName, lastName). Domain method (src/Services/bravoTALENTS/Employee.Domain/AggregatesModel/User.cs:202-209) recomputesFullNameas single source of truth. Three sites still manually patchuser.FullName = user.GetFullName()after assigning name fields —src/Services/bravoTALENTS/Employee.Application/Factories/UserFactory.cs:50,src/Services/bravoSURVEYS/LearningPlatform.Application/ApplyPlatform/MessageBus/Consumers/AccountUserDeletedEventBusConsumer.cs:102,src/Services/bravoINSIGHTS/Analyze/Analyze.Application/MessageBus/Consumers/AccountUserDeletedEventBusConsumer.cs:66. Next time touching any: replace manual patch withuser.UpdateName(...)to maintain invariant. - [2026-03-31] ParallelAsync + repo/UoW MUST ATTENTION use
ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVERExecuteUowTask.ExecuteUowTaskcreates new UoW but reuses outer DI scope (same DbContext) — parallel iterations sharing non-thread-safe DbContext silently corrupt data.ExecuteInjectScopedAsynccreates new UoW + new DI scope (fresh repo per iteration). - [2026-03-31] Bus message naming MUST ATTENTION include service name prefix — core services NEVER consume feature events. Prefix declares schema ownership (
AccountUserEntityEventBusMessage= Accounts owns). Core services (Accounts, Communication) leaders. Feature services (Growth, Talents) sending to core MUST ATTENTION use{CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage— NEVER define own event for core to consume.
Naming & Abstraction
- [2026-04-12] Name PURPOSE not CONTENT — "OrXxx" anti-pattern.
HrManagerOrHrOrPayrollHrOperationsPolicynames set members, not what guards. Add role → rename = broken abstraction. Rule: names express DOES/GUARDS, not CONTAINS. Test: adding/removing member forces rename? YES = content-driven = bad → rename to purpose (e.g.,HrOperationsAccessPolicy). Nuance: "Or" fine behavioral idioms (FirstOrDefault,SuccessOrThrow) — expresses HAPPENS, not membership.
Environment & Tooling
- [2026-04-20] Windows bash: NEVER assume
python/python3resolves — verify alias first. Python may not be bash PATH under those names. Check:where python/where py. ALWAYS preferpy(Windows Python Launcher) one-liners,nodeif JS alternative exists.
Test-specific lessons →
docs/project-reference/integration-test-reference.mdLessons Learned section. Production-code anti-patterns →docs/project-reference/backend-patterns-reference.mdAnti-Patterns section. Generic debugging/refactoring reminders → System Lessons.claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs.
Closing Reminders
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION holistic-first: verify ALL preconditions (config, env, DB names, endpoints, DI regs) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis — cheapest check first
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom site; trace caller (wrong data) vs callee (wrong handling), fix root owner
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION parallel async + repo/UoW → ALWAYS
ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVERExecuteUowTask(shared DbContext = silent data corruption) - IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION bus message prefix = schema ownership; feature services NEVER define events for core services — use
{CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage - IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION name by PURPOSE — adding/removing member forces rename = broken abstraction
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION sub-agents MUST write findings after each file/section — NEVER batch all findings into one final write
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Windows bash: NEVER assume
python/python3resolves — runwhere python/where pyfirst, usepylauncher ornode - IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every claim needs
file:lineevidence — confidence >80% to act, NEVER speculate
[LESSON-LEARNED-REMINDER] [BLOCKING] Task Planning & Continuous Improvement — MANDATORY. Do not skip.
Break work into small tasks (task tracking) before starting. Add final task: "Analyze AI mistakes & lessons learned".
Extract lessons — ROOT CAUSE ONLY, not symptom fixes:
- Name the FAILURE MODE (reasoning/assumption failure), not symptom — "assumed API existed without reading source" not "used wrong enum value".
- Generality test: does this failure mode apply to ≥3 contexts/codebases? If not, abstract one level up.
- Write as a universal rule — strip project-specific names/paths/classes. Useful on any codebase.
- Consolidate: multiple mistakes sharing one failure mode → ONE lesson.
- Recurrence gate: "Would this recur in future session WITHOUT this reminder?" — No → skip
$learn. - Auto-fix gate: "Could
$code-review/$code-simplifier/$security/$lintcatch this?" — Yes → improve review skill instead. - BOTH gates pass → ask user to run
$learn. [TASK-PLANNING] [MANDATORY] BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all planned steps, then keep it synchronized as each step starts/completes.