Agent Skills: Repomix Skill

[AI & Tools] Package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix with customizable patterns and multiple output formats. Triggers: repomix, package repo, repository context, codebase snapshot, repo pack.

UncategorizedID: duc01226/easyplatform/repomix

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform/tree/HEAD/.agents/skills/repomix

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for repomix.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

.agents/skills/repomix/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
repomix
Description
'[AI & Tools] Use when you need to package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix with customizable patterns and multiple output formats.'

Codex compatibility note:

  • Invoke repository skills with $skill-name in Codex; this mirrored copy rewrites legacy Claude /skill-name references.
  • Prefer the plan-hard skill for planning guidance in this Codex mirror.
  • Task tracker mandate: BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all steps and keep it synchronized as progress changes.
  • User-question prompts mean to ask the user directly in Codex.
  • Ignore Claude-specific mode-switch instructions when they appear.
  • Strict execution contract: when a user explicitly invokes a skill, execute that skill protocol as written.
  • Subagent authorization: when a skill is user-invoked or AI-detected and its protocol requires subagents, that skill activation authorizes use of the required spawn_agent subagent(s) for that task.
  • Do not skip, reorder, or merge protocol steps unless the user explicitly approves the deviation first.
  • For workflow skills, execute each listed child-skill step explicitly and report step-by-step evidence.
  • If a required step/tool cannot run in this environment, stop and ask the user before adapting.
<!-- CODEX:PROJECT-REFERENCE-LOADING:START -->

Codex Project-Reference Loading (No Hooks)

Codex does not receive Claude hook-based doc injection. When coding, planning, debugging, testing, or reviewing, open project docs explicitly using this routing.

Always read:

  • docs/project-config.json (project-specific paths, commands, modules, and workflow/test settings)
  • docs/project-reference/docs-index-reference.md (routes to the full docs/project-reference/* catalog)
  • docs/project-reference/lessons.md (always-on guardrails and anti-patterns)

Situation-based docs:

  • Backend/CQRS/API/domain/entity changes: backend-patterns-reference.md, domain-entities-reference.md, project-structure-reference.md
  • Frontend/UI/styling/design-system: frontend-patterns-reference.md, scss-styling-guide.md, design-system/README.md
  • Spec/test-case planning or TC mapping: feature-docs-reference.md
  • Integration test implementation/review: integration-test-reference.md
  • E2E test implementation/review: e2e-test-reference.md
  • Code review/audit work: code-review-rules.md plus domain docs above based on changed files

Do not read all docs blindly. Start from docs-index-reference.md, then open only relevant files for the task.

<!-- CODEX:PROJECT-REFERENCE-LOADING:END -->

Quick Summary

Goal: Package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix for LLM analysis.

Workflow:

  1. Assess — Identify target repo (local/remote), output format, sensitivity concerns
  2. Configure — Set include/ignore patterns, comment removal, output style
  3. Execute — Run repomix with options, monitor token counts
  4. Validate — Review output for sensitive data, check token limits for target LLM

Key Rules:

  • Always review output before sharing (security check for API keys, credentials)
  • Use --include patterns to stay within LLM context limits
  • Default output is XML; use --style markdown for readable output
  • Use --token-count-tree to identify token-heavy files before packaging

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Repomix Skill

Repomix packs entire repositories into single, AI-friendly files. Perfect for feeding codebases to LLMs like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini.

When to Use

Use when:

  • Packaging codebases for AI analysis
  • Creating repository snapshots for LLM context
  • Analyzing third-party libraries
  • Preparing for security audits
  • Generating documentation context
  • Investigating bugs across large codebases
  • Creating AI-friendly code representations

Quick Start

Check Installation

repomix --version

Install

# npm
npm install -g repomix

# Homebrew (macOS/Linux)
brew install repomix

Basic Usage

# Package current directory (generates repomix-output.xml)
repomix

# Specify output format
repomix --style markdown
repomix --style json

# Package remote repository
npx repomix --remote owner/repo

# Custom output with filters
repomix --include "src/**/*.ts" --remove-comments -o output.md

Core Capabilities

Repository Packaging

  • AI-optimized formatting with clear separators
  • Multiple output formats: XML, Markdown, JSON, Plain text
  • Git-aware processing (respects .gitignore)
  • Token counting for LLM context management
  • Security checks for sensitive information

Remote Repository Support

Process remote repositories without cloning:

# Shorthand
npx repomix --remote yamadashy/repomix

# Full URL
npx repomix --remote https://github.com/owner/repo

# Specific commit
npx repomix --remote https://github.com/owner/repo/commit/hash

Comment Removal

Strip comments from supported languages (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, TypeScript, Vue, Svelte, Python, PHP, Ruby, C, C#, Java, Go, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, Dart, Shell, YAML):

repomix --remove-comments

Common Use Cases

Code Review Preparation

# Package feature branch for AI review
repomix --include "src/**/*.ts" --remove-comments -o review.md --style markdown

Security Audit

# Package third-party library
npx repomix --remote vendor/library --style xml -o audit.xml

Documentation Generation

# Package with docs and code
repomix --include "src/**,docs/**,*.md" --style markdown -o context.md

Bug Investigation

# Package specific modules
repomix --include "src/auth/**,src/api/**" -o debug-context.xml

Implementation Planning

# Full codebase context
repomix --remove-comments --copy

Command Line Reference

File Selection

# Include specific patterns
repomix --include "src/**/*.ts,*.md"

# Ignore additional patterns
repomix -i "tests/**,*.test.js"

# Disable .gitignore rules
repomix --no-gitignore

Output Options

# Output format
repomix --style markdown  # or xml, json, plain

# Output file path
repomix -o output.md

# Remove comments
repomix --remove-comments

# Copy to clipboard
repomix --copy

Configuration

# Use custom config file
repomix -c custom-config.json

# Initialize new config
repomix --init  # creates repomix.config.json

Token Management

Repomix automatically counts tokens for individual files, total repository, and per-format output.

Typical LLM context limits:

  • Claude Sonnet 4.5: ~200K tokens
  • GPT-4: ~128K tokens
  • GPT-3.5: ~16K tokens

Token Count Optimization

Understanding your codebase's token distribution is crucial for optimizing AI interactions. Use the --token-count-tree option to visualize token usage across your project:

repomix --token-count-tree

This displays a hierarchical view of your codebase with token counts:

🔢 Token Count Tree:
────────────────────
└── src/ (70,925 tokens)
    ├── cli/ (12,714 tokens)
    │   ├── actions/ (7,546 tokens)
    │   └── reporters/ (990 tokens)
    └── core/ (41,600 tokens)
        ├── file/ (10,098 tokens)
        └── output/ (5,808 tokens)

You can also set a minimum token threshold to focus on larger files:

repomix --token-count-tree 1000  # Only show files/directories with 1000+ tokens

This helps you:

  • Identify token-heavy files that might exceed AI context limits
  • Optimize file selection using --include and --ignore patterns
  • Plan compression strategies by targeting the largest contributors
  • Balance content vs. context when preparing code for AI analysis

Security Considerations

Repomix uses Secretlint to detect sensitive data (API keys, passwords, credentials, private keys, AWS secrets).

Best practices:

  1. Always review output before sharing
  2. Use .repomixignore for sensitive files
  3. Enable security checks for unknown codebases
  4. Avoid packaging .env files
  5. Check for hardcoded credentials

Disable security checks if needed:

repomix --no-security-check

Implementation Workflow

When user requests repository packaging:

  1. Assess Requirements

    • Identify target repository (local/remote)
    • Determine output format needed
    • Check for sensitive data concerns
  2. Configure Filters

    • Set include patterns for relevant files
    • Add ignore patterns for unnecessary files
    • Enable/disable comment removal
  3. Execute Packaging

    • Run repomix with appropriate options
    • Monitor token counts
    • Verify security checks
  4. Validate Output

    • Review generated file
    • Confirm no sensitive data
    • Check token limits for target LLM
  5. Deliver Context

    • Provide packaged file to user
    • Include token count summary
    • Note any warnings or issues

Reference Documentation

For detailed information, see:

  • Configuration Reference - Config files, include/exclude patterns, output formats, advanced options
  • Usage Patterns - AI analysis workflows, security audit preparation, documentation generation, library evaluation

Additional Resources

  • GitHub: https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix
  • Documentation: https:/$repomix.com/guide/
  • MCP Server: Available for AI assistant integration

[IMPORTANT] Use task tracking to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task: Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.

<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.

<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->

Closing Reminders

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using task tracking BEFORE starting IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act) IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using task tracking.

<!-- CODEX:SYNC-PROMPT-PROTOCOLS:START -->

Hookless Prompt Protocol Mirror (Auto-Synced)

Source: .claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs + .claude/.ck.json

[WORKFLOW-EXECUTION-PROTOCOL] [BLOCKING] Workflow Execution Protocol — MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST CRITICAL. Do not skip for any reason.

  1. DETECT: Match prompt against workflow catalog
  2. ANALYZE: Find best-match workflow AND evaluate if a custom step combination would fit better
  3. ASK (REQUIRED FORMAT): Use a direct user question with this structure:
    • Question: "Which workflow do you want to activate?"
    • Option 1: "Activate [BestMatch Workflow] (Recommended)"
    • Option 2: "Activate custom workflow: [step1 → step2 → ...]" (include one-line rationale)
  4. ACTIVATE (if confirmed): Call $workflow-start <workflowId> for standard; sequence custom steps manually
  5. CREATE TASKS: task tracking for ALL workflow steps
  6. EXECUTE: Follow each step in sequence [CRITICAL-THINKING-MINDSET] Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination principle: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination. AI Attention principle (Primacy-Recency): Put the 3 most critical rules at both top and bottom of long prompts/protocols so instruction adherence survives long context windows.

Learned Lessons

Lessons Learned

[CRITICAL] Hard-won project debugging/architecture rules. MUST ATTENTION apply BEFORE forming hypothesis or writing code.

Quick Summary

Goal: Prevent recurrence of known failure patterns — debugging, architecture, naming, AI orchestration, environment.

Top Rules (apply always):

  • MUST ATTENTION verify ALL preconditions (config, env, DB names, DI regs) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis
  • MUST ATTENTION fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom sites with caller-specific defensive code
  • MUST ATTENTION use ExecuteInjectScopedAsync for parallel async + repo/UoW — NEVER ExecuteUowTask
  • MUST ATTENTION name by PURPOSE not CONTENT — adding member forces rename = abstraction broken
  • MUST ATTENTION persist sub-agent findings incrementally after each file — NEVER batch at end
  • MUST ATTENTION Windows bash: verify Python alias (where python/where py) — NEVER assume python/python3 resolves

Debugging & Root Cause Reasoning

  • [2026-04-11] Holistic-first: verify environment before code. Failure → list ALL preconditions (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI regs, credentials, permissions, data prerequisites) → verify each via evidence (grep/cat/query) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis. Worst rabbit holes: diving nearest layer while bug sits elsewhere — e.g., hours debugging "sync timeout", real cause: test appsettings pointing wrong DB. ALWAYS cheapest check first.
  • [2026-04-01] Ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace: bug caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling)? Fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom site masking real issue.
  • [2026-04-01] Trace data lifecycle, not error site. Follow data: creation → transformation → consumption. Bug usually where data created wrong, not consumed.
  • [2026-04-01] Code caller-agnostic. Functions/handlers/consumers don't know who invokes them. Comments/guards/messages describe business intent — NEVER reference specific callers (tests, seeders, scripts).

Architecture Invariants

  • [2026-05-09] User name materialization MUST ATTENTION go through User.UpdateName(firstName, middleName, lastName). Domain method (src/Services/bravoTALENTS/Employee.Domain/AggregatesModel/User.cs:202-209) recomputes FullName as single source of truth. Three sites still manually patch user.FullName = user.GetFullName() after assigning name fields — src/Services/bravoTALENTS/Employee.Application/Factories/UserFactory.cs:50, src/Services/bravoSURVEYS/LearningPlatform.Application/ApplyPlatform/MessageBus/Consumers/AccountUserDeletedEventBusConsumer.cs:102, src/Services/bravoINSIGHTS/Analyze/Analyze.Application/MessageBus/Consumers/AccountUserDeletedEventBusConsumer.cs:66. Next time touching any: replace manual patch with user.UpdateName(...) to maintain invariant.
  • [2026-03-31] ParallelAsync + repo/UoW MUST ATTENTION use ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVER ExecuteUowTask. ExecuteUowTask creates new UoW but reuses outer DI scope (same DbContext) — parallel iterations sharing non-thread-safe DbContext silently corrupt data. ExecuteInjectScopedAsync creates new UoW + new DI scope (fresh repo per iteration).
  • [2026-03-31] Bus message naming MUST ATTENTION include service name prefix — core services NEVER consume feature events. Prefix declares schema ownership (AccountUserEntityEventBusMessage = Accounts owns). Core services (Accounts, Communication) leaders. Feature services (Growth, Talents) sending to core MUST ATTENTION use {CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage — NEVER define own event for core to consume.

Naming & Abstraction

  • [2026-04-12] Name PURPOSE not CONTENT — "OrXxx" anti-pattern. HrManagerOrHrOrPayrollHrOperationsPolicy names set members, not what guards. Add role → rename = broken abstraction. Rule: names express DOES/GUARDS, not CONTAINS. Test: adding/removing member forces rename? YES = content-driven = bad → rename to purpose (e.g., HrOperationsAccessPolicy). Nuance: "Or" fine behavioral idioms (FirstOrDefault, SuccessOrThrow) — expresses HAPPENS, not membership.

Environment & Tooling

  • [2026-04-20] Windows bash: NEVER assume python/python3 resolves — verify alias first. Python may not be bash PATH under those names. Check: where python / where py. ALWAYS prefer py (Windows Python Launcher) one-liners, node if JS alternative exists.

Test-specific lessons → docs/project-reference/integration-test-reference.md Lessons Learned section. Production-code anti-patterns → docs/project-reference/backend-patterns-reference.md Anti-Patterns section. Generic debugging/refactoring reminders → System Lessons .claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs.


Closing Reminders

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION holistic-first: verify ALL preconditions (config, env, DB names, endpoints, DI regs) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis — cheapest check first
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom site; trace caller (wrong data) vs callee (wrong handling), fix root owner
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION parallel async + repo/UoW → ALWAYS ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVER ExecuteUowTask (shared DbContext = silent data corruption)
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION bus message prefix = schema ownership; feature services NEVER define events for core services — use {CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION name by PURPOSE — adding/removing member forces rename = broken abstraction
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION sub-agents MUST write findings after each file/section — NEVER batch all findings into one final write
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Windows bash: NEVER assume python/python3 resolves — run where python/where py first, use py launcher or node
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every claim needs file:line evidence — confidence >80% to act, NEVER speculate

[LESSON-LEARNED-REMINDER] [BLOCKING] Task Planning & Continuous Improvement — MANDATORY. Do not skip.

Break work into small tasks (task tracking) before starting. Add final task: "Analyze AI mistakes & lessons learned".

Extract lessons — ROOT CAUSE ONLY, not symptom fixes:

  1. Name the FAILURE MODE (reasoning/assumption failure), not symptom — "assumed API existed without reading source" not "used wrong enum value".
  2. Generality test: does this failure mode apply to ≥3 contexts/codebases? If not, abstract one level up.
  3. Write as a universal rule — strip project-specific names/paths/classes. Useful on any codebase.
  4. Consolidate: multiple mistakes sharing one failure mode → ONE lesson.
  5. Recurrence gate: "Would this recur in future session WITHOUT this reminder?" — No → skip $learn.
  6. Auto-fix gate: "Could $code-review/$code-simplifier/$security/$lint catch this?" — Yes → improve review skill instead.
  7. BOTH gates pass → ask user to run $learn. [TASK-PLANNING] [MANDATORY] BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all planned steps, then keep it synchronized as each step starts/completes.
<!-- CODEX:SYNC-PROMPT-PROTOCOLS:END -->