Agent Skills: Code Review Workflow

[Testing] Autonomous subagent variant of code-review. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or performing refactoring analysis with focus on patterns, security, and performance.

UncategorizedID: duc01226/easyplatform/tasks-code-review

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform/tree/HEAD/.claude/skills/tasks-code-review

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for tasks-code-review.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

.claude/skills/tasks-code-review/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
tasks-code-review
Description
"[Testing] Autonomous subagent variant of code-review. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or performing refactoring analysis with focus on patterns, security, and performance."

Skill Variant: Use this skill for autonomous, comprehensive code reviews with structured checklists. For interactive code review discussions with user feedback, use code-review instead.

Code Review Workflow

Summary

Goal: Perform autonomous, comprehensive code reviews with structured checklists covering architecture, patterns, quality, security, and performance.

| Step | Action | Key Notes | |------|--------|-----------| | 1 | Understand context | Read changed files, identify scope and intent | | 2 | Architecture compliance | Clean Architecture layers, repository patterns, service boundaries | | 3 | Pattern adherence | CQRS, entity patterns, component hierarchy, platform base classes | | 4 | Code quality | SRP, DRY, naming, abstractions | | 5 | Security & performance | Authorization, injection, N+1, pagination, caching | | 6 | Generate report | Findings with severity, file references, suggested fixes |

Key Principles:

  • Autonomous variant — for interactive reviews with user feedback, use code-review instead
  • Check all 5 review dimensions: architecture, patterns, quality, security, performance
  • Every finding must reference specific file and line

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing pull requests
  • Analyzing code for refactoring
  • Pre-commit code quality check
  • Security and performance audit

Review Dimensions

1. Architecture Compliance

  • [ ] Follows Clean Architecture layers
  • [ ] Uses correct repository pattern
  • [ ] No cross-service boundary violations
  • [ ] Proper separation of concerns

2. Pattern Adherence

  • [ ] CQRS patterns followed (Command/Query/Handler in ONE file)
  • [ ] Entity patterns correct (expressions, computed properties)
  • [ ] Frontend component hierarchy respected
  • [ ] Platform base classes used correctly

3. Code Quality

  • [ ] Single Responsibility Principle
  • [ ] No code duplication
  • [ ] Meaningful naming
  • [ ] Appropriate abstractions

4. Security

  • [ ] No SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • [ ] Authorization checks present
  • [ ] Sensitive data handling
  • [ ] Input validation

5. Performance

  • [ ] N+1 query prevention (eager loading)
  • [ ] Proper paging for large datasets
  • [ ] Parallel operations where applicable
  • [ ] Caching considerations

Review Process

Step 1: Understand Context

# Get changed files
git diff --name-only main...HEAD

# Get full diff
git diff main...HEAD

# Check commit messages
git log main...HEAD --oneline

Step 2: Categorize Changes

## Files Changed

### Domain Layer
- `Entity.cs` - New entity

### Application Layer
- `SaveEntityCommand.cs` - New command

### Persistence Layer
- `EntityConfiguration.cs` - EF configuration

### Frontend
- `entity-list.component.ts` - List component

Step 3: Review Each Category

Backend Review Checklist

## Entity Review
- [ ] Inherits from correct base (RootEntity/RootAuditedEntity)
- [ ] Static expressions for queries
- [ ] Computed properties have empty `set { }`
- [ ] Navigation properties have `[JsonIgnore]`
- [ ] `[TrackFieldUpdatedDomainEvent]` on tracked fields

## Command/Query Review
- [ ] Command + Handler + Result in ONE file
- [ ] Uses service-specific repository
- [ ] Validation uses fluent API
- [ ] No side effects in command handler
- [ ] DTO mapping in DTO class, not handler

## Repository Usage Review
- [ ] Uses `GetQueryBuilder` for reusable queries
- [ ] Uses `WhereIf` for optional filters
- [ ] Parallel tuple queries for count + data
- [ ] Proper eager loading

## Event Handler Review
- [ ] In `UseCaseEvents/` folder
- [ ] Uses `PlatformCqrsEntityEventApplicationHandler<T>`
- [ ] `HandleWhen` is `public override async Task<bool>`
- [ ] Filters by `CrudAction` appropriately

Frontend Review Checklist

## Component Review
- [ ] Correct base class for use case
- [ ] Store provided at component level
- [ ] Loading/error states handled
- [ ] `untilDestroyed()` on subscriptions
- [ ] Track-by in `@for` loops

## Store Review
- [ ] State interface defined
- [ ] `vmConstructor` provides defaults
- [ ] Effects use `observerLoadingErrorState`
- [ ] Immutable state updates

## Form Review
- [ ] `validateForm()` before submit
- [ ] Async validators conditional
- [ ] Dependent validations configured
- [ ] Error messages for all rules

## API Service Review
- [ ] Extends `PlatformApiService`
- [ ] Typed responses
- [ ] Caching where appropriate

Step 4: Security Review

## Security Checklist

### Authorization
- [ ] `[PlatformAuthorize]` on controllers
- [ ] Role checks in handlers
- [ ] Data filtered by company/user context

### Input Validation
- [ ] All inputs validated
- [ ] No raw SQL strings
- [ ] File upload validation

### Sensitive Data
- [ ] No secrets in code
- [ ] Passwords hashed
- [ ] PII handled correctly

Step 5: Performance Review

## Performance Checklist

### Database
- [ ] Indexes on filtered columns
- [ ] Eager loading for N+1 prevention
- [ ] Paging for large datasets

### API
- [ ] Response size reasonable
- [ ] Parallel operations used
- [ ] Caching for static data

### Frontend
- [ ] Lazy loading for routes
- [ ] Track-by for lists
- [ ] OnPush change detection

Review Report Template

# Code Review Report

## Summary
- **PR/Changes**: [Description]
- **Reviewer**: AI
- **Date**: [Date]

## Overall Assessment
[APPROVED | APPROVED WITH COMMENTS | CHANGES REQUESTED]

## Issues Found

### Critical (Must Fix)
1. **[File:Line]**: [Description]

### Major (Should Fix)
1. **[File:Line]**: [Description]

### Minor (Consider Fixing)
1. **[File:Line]**: [Description]

## Recommendations
1. [Recommendation 1]
2. [Recommendation 2]

Verification Checklist

  • [ ] All changed files reviewed
  • [ ] Architecture compliance verified
  • [ ] Platform patterns followed
  • [ ] Security concerns addressed
  • [ ] Performance considered
  • [ ] Review report generated

Related

  • code-review
  • tasks-test-generation

IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST FOLLOW)

  • Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks
  • Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements