<!-- CODEX:PROJECT-REFERENCE-LOADING:START -->Codex compatibility note:
- Invoke repository skills with
$skill-namein Codex; this mirrored copy rewrites legacy Claude/skill-namereferences.- Prefer the
plan-hardskill for planning guidance in this Codex mirror.- Task tracker mandate: BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all steps and keep it synchronized as progress changes.
- User-question prompts mean to ask the user directly in Codex.
- Ignore Claude-specific mode-switch instructions when they appear.
- Strict execution contract: when a user explicitly invokes a skill, execute that skill protocol as written.
- Subagent authorization: when a skill is user-invoked or AI-detected and its protocol requires subagents, that skill activation authorizes use of the required
spawn_agentsubagent(s) for that task.- Do not skip, reorder, or merge protocol steps unless the user explicitly approves the deviation first.
- For workflow skills, execute each listed child-skill step explicitly and report step-by-step evidence.
- If a required step/tool cannot run in this environment, stop and ask the user before adapting.
Codex Project-Reference Loading (No Hooks)
Codex does not receive Claude hook-based doc injection. When coding, planning, debugging, testing, or reviewing, open project docs explicitly using this routing.
Always read:
docs/project-config.json(project-specific paths, commands, modules, and workflow/test settings)docs/project-reference/docs-index-reference.md(routes to the fulldocs/project-reference/*catalog)docs/project-reference/lessons.md(always-on guardrails and anti-patterns)
Situation-based docs:
- Backend/CQRS/API/domain/entity changes:
backend-patterns-reference.md,domain-entities-reference.md,project-structure-reference.md - Frontend/UI/styling/design-system:
frontend-patterns-reference.md,scss-styling-guide.md,design-system/README.md - Spec/test-case planning or TC mapping:
feature-docs-reference.md - Integration test implementation/review:
integration-test-reference.md - E2E test implementation/review:
e2e-test-reference.md - Code review/audit work:
code-review-rules.mdplus domain docs above based on changed files
Do not read all docs blindly. Start from docs-index-reference.md, then open only relevant files for the task.
[IMPORTANT] MUST ATTENTION keep task tracking synchronized, preserve evidence gates, and NEVER skip mandatory steps.
[DEPRECATED] This skill has been merged into
$tdd-spec. Use$tdd-spec [direction=sync]instead.
- Forward sync (feature docs → dashboard):
$tdd-spec [direction=sync]- Reverse sync (dashboard → feature docs):
$tdd-spec [direction=reverse]- Bidirectional reconciliation:
$tdd-spec [direction=full]All sync algorithms, orphan detection, staleness tracking, and quality gates are now in
$tdd-specunder the## Mode: Sync to Dashboardsection.
Quick Summary
Goal: [DEPRECATED] This skill has been merged into tdd-spec. Use $tdd-spec [direction=sync] for forward sync, $tdd-spec [direction=reverse] for reverse sync, $tdd-spec [direction=full] for bidirectional reconciliation.
Workflow:
- Detect — classify request scope and target artifacts.
- Execute — apply required steps with evidence-backed actions.
- Verify — confirm constraints, output quality, and completion evidence.
Key Rules:
- MUST ATTENTION keep claims evidence-based (
file:line) with confidence >80% to act. - MUST ATTENTION keep task tracking updated as each step starts/completes.
- NEVER skip mandatory workflow or skill gates.
Closing Reminders
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION apply Phase 1 compression before structural enhancement; preserve semantic meaning. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION NEVER alter YAML frontmatter, code blocks, tables, or SYNC-tag bodies during optimization. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION keep evidence gates and mandatory workflow/skill steps explicit and enforceable. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review task to verify output quality and unresolved risks.
<!-- CODEX:SYNC-PROMPT-PROTOCOLS:START -->Hookless Prompt Protocol Mirror (Auto-Synced)
Source: .claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs + .claude/.ck.json
[WORKFLOW-EXECUTION-PROTOCOL] [BLOCKING] Workflow Execution Protocol — MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST CRITICAL. Do not skip for any reason.
- DETECT: Match prompt against workflow catalog
- ANALYZE: Find best-match workflow AND evaluate if a custom step combination would fit better
- ASK (REQUIRED FORMAT): Use a direct user question with this structure:
- Question: "Which workflow do you want to activate?"
- Option 1: "Activate [BestMatch Workflow] (Recommended)"
- Option 2: "Activate custom workflow: [step1 → step2 → ...]" (include one-line rationale)
- ACTIVATE (if confirmed): Call
$workflow-start <workflowId>for standard; sequence custom steps manually - CREATE TASKS: task tracking for ALL workflow steps
- EXECUTE: Follow each step in sequence [CRITICAL-THINKING-MINDSET] Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination principle: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination. AI Attention principle (Primacy-Recency): Put the 3 most critical rules at both top and bottom of long prompts/protocols so instruction adherence survives long context windows.
Learned Lessons
Lessons Learned
[CRITICAL] Hard-won project debugging/architecture rules. MUST ATTENTION apply BEFORE forming hypothesis or writing code.
Quick Summary
Goal: Prevent recurrence of known failure patterns — debugging, architecture, naming, AI orchestration, environment.
Top Rules (apply always):
- MUST ATTENTION verify ALL preconditions (config, env, DB names, DI regs) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis
- MUST ATTENTION fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom sites with caller-specific defensive code
- MUST ATTENTION use
ExecuteInjectScopedAsyncfor parallel async + repo/UoW — NEVERExecuteUowTask - MUST ATTENTION name by PURPOSE not CONTENT — adding member forces rename = abstraction broken
- MUST ATTENTION persist sub-agent findings incrementally after each file — NEVER batch at end
- MUST ATTENTION Windows bash: verify Python alias (
where python/where py) — NEVER assumepython/python3resolves
Debugging & Root Cause Reasoning
- [2026-04-11] Holistic-first: verify environment before code. Failure → list ALL preconditions (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI regs, credentials, permissions, data prerequisites) → verify each via evidence (grep/cat/query) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis. Worst rabbit holes: diving nearest layer while bug sits elsewhere — e.g., hours debugging "sync timeout", real cause: test appsettings pointing wrong DB. ALWAYS cheapest check first.
- [2026-04-01] Ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace: bug caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling)? Fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom site masking real issue.
- [2026-04-01] Trace data lifecycle, not error site. Follow data: creation → transformation → consumption. Bug usually where data created wrong, not consumed.
- [2026-04-01] Code caller-agnostic. Functions/handlers/consumers don't know who invokes them. Comments/guards/messages describe business intent — NEVER reference specific callers (tests, seeders, scripts).
Architecture Invariants
- [2026-05-09] User name materialization MUST ATTENTION go through
User.UpdateName(firstName, middleName, lastName). Domain method (src/Services/bravoTALENTS/Employee.Domain/AggregatesModel/User.cs:202-209) recomputesFullNameas single source of truth. Three sites still manually patchuser.FullName = user.GetFullName()after assigning name fields —src/Services/bravoTALENTS/Employee.Application/Factories/UserFactory.cs:50,src/Services/bravoSURVEYS/LearningPlatform.Application/ApplyPlatform/MessageBus/Consumers/AccountUserDeletedEventBusConsumer.cs:102,src/Services/bravoINSIGHTS/Analyze/Analyze.Application/MessageBus/Consumers/AccountUserDeletedEventBusConsumer.cs:66. Next time touching any: replace manual patch withuser.UpdateName(...)to maintain invariant. - [2026-03-31] ParallelAsync + repo/UoW MUST ATTENTION use
ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVERExecuteUowTask.ExecuteUowTaskcreates new UoW but reuses outer DI scope (same DbContext) — parallel iterations sharing non-thread-safe DbContext silently corrupt data.ExecuteInjectScopedAsynccreates new UoW + new DI scope (fresh repo per iteration). - [2026-03-31] Bus message naming MUST ATTENTION include service name prefix — core services NEVER consume feature events. Prefix declares schema ownership (
AccountUserEntityEventBusMessage= Accounts owns). Core services (Accounts, Communication) leaders. Feature services (Growth, Talents) sending to core MUST ATTENTION use{CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage— NEVER define own event for core to consume.
Naming & Abstraction
- [2026-04-12] Name PURPOSE not CONTENT — "OrXxx" anti-pattern.
HrManagerOrHrOrPayrollHrOperationsPolicynames set members, not what guards. Add role → rename = broken abstraction. Rule: names express DOES/GUARDS, not CONTAINS. Test: adding/removing member forces rename? YES = content-driven = bad → rename to purpose (e.g.,HrOperationsAccessPolicy). Nuance: "Or" fine behavioral idioms (FirstOrDefault,SuccessOrThrow) — expresses HAPPENS, not membership.
Environment & Tooling
- [2026-04-20] Windows bash: NEVER assume
python/python3resolves — verify alias first. Python may not be bash PATH under those names. Check:where python/where py. ALWAYS preferpy(Windows Python Launcher) one-liners,nodeif JS alternative exists.
Test-specific lessons →
docs/project-reference/integration-test-reference.mdLessons Learned section. Production-code anti-patterns →docs/project-reference/backend-patterns-reference.mdAnti-Patterns section. Generic debugging/refactoring reminders → System Lessons.claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs.
Closing Reminders
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION holistic-first: verify ALL preconditions (config, env, DB names, endpoints, DI regs) BEFORE code-layer hypothesis — cheapest check first
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION fix responsible layer — NEVER patch symptom site; trace caller (wrong data) vs callee (wrong handling), fix root owner
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION parallel async + repo/UoW → ALWAYS
ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVERExecuteUowTask(shared DbContext = silent data corruption) - IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION bus message prefix = schema ownership; feature services NEVER define events for core services — use
{CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage - IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION name by PURPOSE — adding/removing member forces rename = broken abstraction
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION sub-agents MUST write findings after each file/section — NEVER batch all findings into one final write
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Windows bash: NEVER assume
python/python3resolves — runwhere python/where pyfirst, usepylauncher ornode - IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every claim needs
file:lineevidence — confidence >80% to act, NEVER speculate
[LESSON-LEARNED-REMINDER] [BLOCKING] Task Planning & Continuous Improvement — MANDATORY. Do not skip.
Break work into small tasks (task tracking) before starting. Add final task: "Analyze AI mistakes & lessons learned".
Extract lessons — ROOT CAUSE ONLY, not symptom fixes:
- Name the FAILURE MODE (reasoning/assumption failure), not symptom — "assumed API existed without reading source" not "used wrong enum value".
- Generality test: does this failure mode apply to ≥3 contexts/codebases? If not, abstract one level up.
- Write as a universal rule — strip project-specific names/paths/classes. Useful on any codebase.
- Consolidate: multiple mistakes sharing one failure mode → ONE lesson.
- Recurrence gate: "Would this recur in future session WITHOUT this reminder?" — No → skip
$learn. - Auto-fix gate: "Could
$code-review/$code-simplifier/$security/$lintcatch this?" — Yes → improve review skill instead. - BOTH gates pass → ask user to run
$learn. [TASK-PLANNING] [MANDATORY] BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all planned steps, then keep it synchronized as each step starts/completes.