Agent Skills: jest-config-generator
Generate Jest configuration files for JavaScript/TypeScript testing with coverage, mocking, and environment-specific settings. Triggers on "create jest config", "generate jest.config", "jest configuration for", "testing config".
ID: ehtbanton/ClaudeSkillsRepo/jest-config-generator
Install this agent skill to your local
Skill Files
The files that make up jest-config-generator.
More agent skills
- catalog-babysitter-usersDiscover public GitHub repositories that import defineTask from @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk and maintain a deduplicated catalog of those repositories in docs/repo-with-babysitter-processes.md. Excludes any repo named "babysitter" (to filter out forks of this monorepo). Invoke when asked to find, discover, catalog, or refresh "repos using babysitter", "babysitter in the wild", or "who else is using babysitter".
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- trigger-dev-tasksUse this skill when writing, designing, or optimizing Trigger.dev background tasks and workflows. This includes creating reliable async tasks, implementing AI workflows, setting up scheduled jobs, structuring complex task hierarchies with subtasks, configuring build extensions for tools like ffmpeg or Puppeteer/Playwright, and handling task schemas with Zod validation.
- review-cycleUnified multi-dimensional code review with automated fix orchestration. Routes to session-based (git changes), module-based (path patterns), or fix mode. Triggers on \"workflow:review-cycle\", \"workflow:review-session-cycle\", \"workflow:review-module-cycle\", \"workflow:review-cycle-fix\".
- ciCI red? Call us. Pipeline fire brigade deploys. Use when user mentions CI failures, build errors, test failures, or pipeline issues. Do NOT load for: local builds, standard implementation work, reviews, or setup.
- scientific-critical-thinkingEvaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.