Agent Skills: Elixir Performance Review

Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.

UncategorizedID: existential-birds/beagle/elixir-performance-review

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle/tree/HEAD/plugins/beagle-elixir/skills/elixir-performance-review

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for elixir-performance-review.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

plugins/beagle-elixir/skills/elixir-performance-review/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
elixir-performance-review
Description
Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.

Elixir Performance Review

Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | Mailbox overflow, blocking calls | references/genserver-bottlenecks.md | | When to use ETS, read/write concurrency | references/ets-patterns.md | | Binary handling, large messages | references/memory.md | | Task patterns, flow control | references/concurrency.md |

Review Checklist

GenServer

  • [ ] Not a single-process bottleneck for all requests
  • [ ] No blocking operations in handle_call/cast
  • [ ] Proper timeout configuration
  • [ ] Consider ETS for read-heavy state

Memory

  • [ ] Large binaries not copied between processes
  • [ ] Streams used for large data transformations
  • [ ] No unbounded data accumulation

Concurrency

  • [ ] Task.Supervisor for dynamic tasks (not raw Task.async)
  • [ ] No unbounded process spawning
  • [ ] Proper backpressure for message producers

Database

  • [ ] Preloading to avoid N+1 queries
  • [ ] Pagination for large result sets
  • [ ] Indexes for frequent queries

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • Single GenServer for low-throughput - Not all state needs horizontal scaling
  • Synchronous calls for critical paths - Consistency may require it
  • In-memory state without ETS - ETS has overhead for small state
  • Enum over Stream for small collections - Stream overhead not worth it

Context-Sensitive Rules

| Issue | Flag ONLY IF | |-------|--------------| | GenServer bottleneck | Handles > 1000 req/sec OR blocking I/O in callbacks | | Use streams | Processing > 10k items OR reading large files | | Use ETS | Read:write ratio > 10:1 AND concurrent access |

Gates — before reporting

Do these in order for the performance review. Do not publish findings until each step passes.

  1. Protocol loaded — Read review-verification-protocol and apply its checks for each finding (hot paths, concurrency, resource use). Pass: For every substantive finding, you can name which protocol subsection you satisfied or state N/A with reason (e.g. pure reference to this skill’s Valid Patterns).
  2. Anchored evidencePass: Each finding includes a concrete locator: path:line (or line range), or Module.function/arity plus a short quoted snippet from the file.
  3. Performance claims — For anything under Context-Sensitive Rules, or any claim of bottleneck, N+1, unbounded growth, or heavy memory/binary cost, Pass: You state the observed or measured fact that meets “Flag ONLY IF” (e.g. rate, item count, ratio), or attach an artifact (profiler output, SQL/log excerpt, grep/search scope)—otherwise downgrade to question / suspected with what was not verified.

Before Submitting Findings

Complete Gates — before reporting (section above) first; the verification protocol is mandatory input to those gates.