🔧 Tech Debt Reducer Skill

🔧 Tech Debt Reducer

Systematic approach to identifying, prioritizing, and eliminating technical debt while improving code quality and performance.

Quick Reference

| Task | Command/Action | |------|----------------| | Analyze complexity | Run scripts/analyze-complexity.ts | | Find unused code | Run scripts/find-unused.ts | | Detect code smells | Run scripts/detect-smells.ts | | Generate debt report | Run scripts/debt-report.ts | | Prioritize debt items | Follow "Prioritization Matrix" section |

Core Methodology

Phase 1: Assessment (ALWAYS FIRST)

Before any refactoring, assess the current state:

## 📊 Tech Debt Assessment

### Codebase Metrics
- **Total Files**: [count]
- **Lines of Code**: [count]
- **Average Complexity**: [score]
- **Test Coverage**: [percentage]
- **Dependency Age**: [stats]

### Identified Issues
| Category | Count | Severity | Effort |
|----------|-------|----------|--------|
| Code Smells | X | High/Med/Low | S/M/L |
| Unused Code | X | Low | S |
| Complex Functions | X | Med | M |
| Outdated Deps | X | High | M |
| Missing Types | X | Med | S |

Phase 2: Categorization

Classify debt into categories:

| Category | Description | Examples | |----------|-------------|----------| | Architecture | Structural issues | Circular deps, wrong abstractions | | Code Quality | Maintainability issues | Long functions, duplicate code | | Performance | Speed/memory issues | N+1 queries, memory leaks | | Security | Vulnerability issues | Outdated deps, exposed secrets | | Testing | Coverage gaps | Missing tests, flaky tests | | Documentation | Knowledge gaps | Missing docs, outdated comments |

Phase 3: Prioritization Matrix

Use the Impact vs Effort matrix:

High Impact │  Quick Wins    │  Strategic
            │  (Do First)    │  (Plan Carefully)
────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────────
Low Impact  │  Fill-ins      │  Avoid
            │  (If Time)     │  (Not Worth It)
            └────────────────┴─────────────────
              Low Effort       High Effort

Priority Formula: Score = (Impact × Risk) / Effort

Phase 4: Refactoring Patterns

See references/REFACTORING_PATTERNS.md for detailed patterns.

Safe Refactoring Workflow

1. ✅ Ensure tests exist (or write them first)
2. 📸 Create snapshot/checkpoint (git commit)
3. 🔧 Apply ONE refactoring at a time
4. 🧪 Run tests after each change
5. 📝 Commit with descriptive message
6. 🔄 Repeat

Code Smell Detection

Common Smells and Fixes

| Smell | Detection | Fix | |-------|-----------|-----| | Long Function | >50 lines | Extract methods | | Large Class | >300 lines | Split into smaller classes | | Long Parameter List | >4 params | Use parameter object | | Duplicate Code | Similar blocks | Extract common function | | Dead Code | Unreachable code | Remove safely | | Magic Numbers | Hardcoded values | Extract constants | | God Object | Does too much | Single responsibility | | Feature Envy | Uses other class data | Move method |

TypeScript-Specific Smells

| Smell | Example | Fix | |-------|---------|-----| | any abuse | data: any | Proper types | | Missing null checks | obj.prop | Optional chaining ?. | | Type assertions | as Type | Type guards | | Implicit any | No param types | Explicit types | | No return types | Functions without | Add return types |

Performance Optimization

Quick Wins

// ❌ Bad: Multiple re-renders
const items = data.filter(x => x.active).map(x => x.name);

// ✅ Good: Single pass with reduce
const items = data.reduce((acc, x) => {
  if (x.active) acc.push(x.name);
  return acc;
}, []);

// ❌ Bad: Creating functions in render
<Button onClick={() => handleClick(id)} />

// ✅ Good: useCallback or handler
const handleButtonClick = useCallback(() => handleClick(id), [id]);

// ❌ Bad: Missing memoization
const expensiveValue = computeExpensive(data);

// ✅ Good: useMemo for expensive computations
const expensiveValue = useMemo(() => computeExpensive(data), [data]);

Database Query Optimization

// ❌ Bad: N+1 Query
const users = await prisma.user.findMany();
for (const user of users) {
  const posts = await prisma.post.findMany({ where: { userId: user.id } });
}

// ✅ Good: Include related data
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({
  include: { posts: true }
});

// ✅ Better: Select only needed fields
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({
  select: { id: true, name: true, posts: { select: { title: true } } }
});

Dependency Management

Update Strategy

Check outdated: npm outdated
Review changelogs for breaking changes
Update in order: patch → minor → major
Test after each major update

Cleanup Unused Dependencies

# Find unused dependencies
npx depcheck

# Analyze bundle size
npx webpack-bundle-analyzer

# Check for duplicates
npm dedupe

Output Template

After completing debt reduction work:

## 🔧 Tech Debt Report

### 📊 Before/After Metrics
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|--------|--------|-------|--------|
| Complexity | X | Y | -Z% |
| Lines of Code | X | Y | -Z% |
| Test Coverage | X% | Y% | +Z% |
| Bundle Size | X KB | Y KB | -Z% |

### ✅ Changes Made
1. [Description of change 1]
2. [Description of change 2]

### 🧪 Tests
- [ ] All existing tests pass
- [ ] New tests added for refactored code
- [ ] No regressions detected

### 📝 Follow-up Items
- [ ] Item that needs future attention

Safety Guidelines

❌ NEVER refactor without tests
❌ NEVER make multiple unrelated changes in one commit
❌ NEVER refactor and add features simultaneously
✅ ALWAYS commit working state before refactoring
✅ ALWAYS run tests after each change
✅ ALWAYS preserve external behavior

Escalation Criteria

Stop and reassess if:

Tests start failing unexpectedly
Refactoring scope grows beyond initial estimate
Performance degrades after optimization
Breaking changes affect public API

Agent Skills: 🔧 Tech Debt Reducer

Install this agent skill to your local

Skill Files