Agent-Skills.md

Agent Skills: Sentry Code Review

Review a project's PRs to check for issues detected in code review by Seer Bug Prediction. Use when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR comments, or to find recent PRs with Sentry feedback.

UncategorizedID: getsentry/sentry-agent-skills/sentry-pr-code-review

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-agent-skills/tree/HEAD/skills/sentry-pr-code-review

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for sentry-pr-code-review.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/sentry-pr-code-review/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
sentry-pr-code-review
Description
Review a project's PRs to check for issues detected in code review by Seer Bug Prediction. Use when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR comments, or to find recent PRs with Sentry feedback.

Sentry Code Review

Review and fix issues identified by Sentry bot in GitHub PR comments.

Invoke This Skill When

  • User asks to "review Sentry comments" or "fix Sentry issues" on a PR
  • User shares a PR URL/number and mentions Sentry feedback
  • User asks to "address Sentry review" or "resolve Sentry findings"
  • User wants to find PRs with unresolved Sentry comments

Workflow

Phase 1: Fetch Sentry Comments

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments \
  --jq '.[] | select(.user.login | startswith("sentry")) | {file: .path, line: .line, body: .body}'

Only process comments from sentry[bot] - ignore other bots.

Phase 2: Parse Each Comment

Extract from the markdown body:

  • Bug description: Line starting with **Bug:**
  • Severity/Confidence: In <sub>Severity: X | Confidence: X.XX</sub>
  • Analysis: Inside <summary>🔍 <b>Detailed Analysis</b></summary> block
  • Suggested Fix: Inside <summary>💡 <b>Suggested Fix</b></summary> block
  • AI Prompt: Inside <summary>🤖 <b>Prompt for AI Agent</b></summary> block

Phase 3: Verify & Fix

For each issue:

  1. Read the file at the specified line
  2. Confirm issue still exists in current code
  3. Review related code to understand if its an actual issue or not
  4. Implement fix (suggested or your own)
  5. Consider edge cases

Phase 4: Summarize and Report Results

## Sentry Review: PR #[number]

### Resolved
| File:Line | Issue | Severity | Fix Applied |
|-----------|-------|----------|-------------|
| path:123  | desc  | HIGH     | what done   |

### Manual Review Required
| File:Line | Issue | Reason |
|-----------|-------|--------|

**Summary:** X resolved, Y need manual review

Common Issue Types

| Category | Examples | |----------|----------| | Type Safety | Missing null checks, unsafe type assertions | | Error Handling | Swallowed errors, missing boundaries | | Validation | Permissive inputs, missing sanitization | | Config | Missing env vars, incorrect paths |