Deep Review: Full-Context Code Review + Fix
Performs a thorough code review with full PR/issue context, then fixes all actionable findings. Combines the depth of spec review, quality review, and Go-specific analysis in a single pass.
Step 0: Parse Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract:
- Bare numeric value: PR number (e.g.,
$review-deep 42) --issue <N>: Use specific issue as context (no PR required)--post: Auto-post findings to PR as a comment (skip asking)--scope <hint>: Focus area for the review (e.g., "error handling", "concurrency")- Remaining text after flags: treated as scope hint
Store as PR_ARG, ISSUE_ARG, AUTO_POST (default: false), SCOPE_HINT.
PR_ARG=""
ISSUE_ARG=""
AUTO_POST=false
SCOPE_HINT=""
ARGS="$ARGUMENTS"
while [ -n "$ARGS" ]; do
case "$ARGS" in
--issue\ *)
ARGS="${ARGS#--issue }"
ISSUE_ARG="${ARGS%% *}"
ARGS="${ARGS#$ISSUE_ARG}"
ARGS="${ARGS# }"
;;
--post*)
AUTO_POST=true
ARGS="${ARGS#--post}"
ARGS="${ARGS# }"
;;
--scope\ *)
ARGS="${ARGS#--scope }"
SCOPE_HINT="$ARGS"
ARGS=""
;;
[0-9]*)
PR_ARG="${ARGS%% *}"
ARGS="${ARGS#$PR_ARG}"
ARGS="${ARGS# }"
;;
*)
SCOPE_HINT="$ARGS"
ARGS=""
;;
esac
done
echo "PR_ARG=$PR_ARG ISSUE_ARG=$ISSUE_ARG AUTO_POST=$AUTO_POST SCOPE_HINT=$SCOPE_HINT"
Step 1: Detect Scope & Base Branch
If PR_ARG is set, use it directly. Otherwise, auto-detect from the current branch using three strategies in order — fall through when each returns empty.
Strategy 1 — current branch:
PR_JSON=$(gh pr view --json number,title,body,state,baseRefName,closingIssuesReferences --jq '.' 2>/dev/null)
Strategy 2 — match HEAD commit against open PRs:
if [ -z "$PR_JSON" ]; then
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD 2>/dev/null)
PR_NUM=$(gh pr list --search "$HEAD_SHA" --state open --json number --jq '.[0].number' 2>/dev/null)
if [ -n "$PR_NUM" ] && [ "$PR_NUM" != "null" ]; then
PR_JSON=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUM" --json number,title,body,state,baseRefName,closingIssuesReferences 2>/dev/null)
fi
fi
Strategy 3 — match HEAD against any (open/closed/merged) PRs:
if [ -z "$PR_JSON" ]; then
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD 2>/dev/null)
PR_NUM=$(gh pr list --search "$HEAD_SHA" --state all --limit 5 --json number --jq '.[0].number' 2>/dev/null)
if [ -n "$PR_NUM" ] && [ "$PR_NUM" != "null" ]; then
PR_JSON=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUM" --json number,title,body,state,baseRefName,closingIssuesReferences 2>/dev/null)
fi
fi
Extract PR number and base branch:
if [ -n "$PR_JSON" ]; then
PR_NUM=$(echo "$PR_JSON" | jq -r '.number')
BASE_BRANCH=$(echo "$PR_JSON" | jq -r '.baseRefName')
echo "Found PR #$PR_NUM (base: $BASE_BRANCH)"
else
BASE_BRANCH=$((git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||' | grep .) || (git remote show -n origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | sed 's/.*: //' | grep .) || echo "main")
echo "No PR found. Using base branch: $BASE_BRANCH"
fi
Display a brief summary of what was detected.
Step 2: Gather Full Context
Read context-gathering.md and execute the procedure end-to-end:
- PR metadata (title, body, state, comments, reviews)
- Linked issues (title, body, labels, comments)
- Review threads (unresolved, with file paths and line numbers)
- Inline review comments
- Pending reviews (CHANGES_REQUESTED)
- Repo guidelines (AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md)
If --issue N was provided instead of a PR, fetch just the issue context. If no PR and no issue, proceed with diff-only review (no requirement verification, no review-comment status).
context-gathering.md includes the size guard — if combined context exceeds ~6000 characters, use summary format.
Step 3: Generate Diff
Based on detected scope:
- Changes vs base branch (default when PR detected):
git diff ${BASE_BRANCH}...HEAD - Uncommitted changes (no PR + uncommitted changes exist):
git diff HEADplus untracked files viagit ls-files --others --exclude-standard - Explicit
PR_ARG: always use changes vs base branch
DIFF=$(git diff "${BASE_BRANCH}...HEAD")
DIFF_LINES=$(printf '%s\n' "$DIFF" | wc -l)
DIFF_FILES=$(printf '%s\n' "$DIFF" | grep -c '^diff --git' || echo 0)
echo "Diff size: $DIFF_LINES lines across $DIFF_FILES files"
If diff exceeds 3000 lines, warn via AskUserQuestion and offer: continue full / Go-only / specify files.
Step 4: Static Analysis
If a Go project is detected (go.mod exists):
CHANGED=$(git diff --name-only "${BASE_BRANCH}...HEAD" | grep '\.go$')
if [ -n "$CHANGED" ]; then
echo "$CHANGED" | xargs -I{} dirname {} | sort -u | xargs go vet 2>&1 || true
echo "$CHANGED" | xargs -I{} dirname {} | sort -u | xargs staticcheck 2>&1 || true
echo "$CHANGED" | xargs -I{} dirname {} | sort -u | xargs go test -race -count=1 2>&1 || true
fi
Static-analysis failures are informational — they feed into the review, not block it.
Step 5: Perform Review
Read review-criteria.md for the full criteria, the Quality Score Rubric, the confidence-scoring guide, and the breaking-change detection block. Apply all criteria to the diff with the gathered context.
Process:
- Review the diff line-by-line against every criterion in
review-criteria.md. - Cross-reference with requirements (when PR/issue context is available): each acceptance criterion → implementation → tests; check for missing requirements and scope creep.
- For each existing review thread, mark whether it appears addressed in the current diff.
- Include the Step 4 static-analysis results.
- Detect breaking changes in exported symbols (grep recipe in
review-criteria.md).
For the exact findings-table layout, spec-compliance table, review-comments-status table, and the recommendation values — Read output-format.md.
Step 6: Fix Findings
Read fix-and-verify.md and follow it end-to-end. Highlights:
- Process findings in priority order (P0 → P3)
- Auto-skip priority 3 AND confidence < 0.5 (nit noise)
- Make minimal fixes; track which fixes are testable
- Parallel-dispatch Agent subagents when 3+ findings target different files
- Generate tests for testable fixes; verify build/test/lint pass
- Stage only modified files (never
git add -A); commit with a descriptive message
Step 7: Post-Review Summary & Actions
Display the final summary:
## Review Complete
- **Findings reported:** <n>
- **Findings fixed:** <n>
- **Findings skipped:** <n> (with reasons)
- **Files changed:** <list>
- **Quality Score:** <n>/100
- **All verifications passed:** yes/no
- **Recommendation:** APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / COMMENT
Post to PR
If AUTO_POST is true and a PR was detected, post immediately with gh pr comment "$PR_NUM" --body ... using the formatting from output-format.md.
If AUTO_POST is false and a PR was detected, ask via AskUserQuestion:
| Option | Description | |--------|-------------| | Post to PR | Add review findings as a PR comment | | Done | Exit the review |
Default: Done.
Further Reading
context-gathering.md— PR/issue/review-thread fetching, repo-guideline detection, size guardreview-criteria.md— full review criteria, Go idiom checks, Quality Score Rubric, confidence scoring, breaking-change detectionfix-and-verify.md— fix iteration, parallel dispatch, test generation, verification, commitoutput-format.md— findings table, spec-compliance table, review-comments-status table, PR-comment template