Agent Skills: Plan Architecture Skill

Plan feature architecture with component breakdown, data flow, and dependency mapping. Use before implementation to define contracts between layers.

UncategorizedID: ils15/copilot-global-config/plan-architecture

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/ils15/pantheon-legacy/tree/HEAD/skills/plan-architecture

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for plan-architecture.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/plan-architecture/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
plan-architecture
Description
Plan feature architecture with component breakdown, data flow, and dependency mapping. Use before implementation to define contracts between layers.

Plan Architecture Skill

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Designing a new feature end-to-end before writing code
  • Breaking down a complex change into implementation phases
  • Mapping dependencies between components
  • Defining API contracts between layers
  • Evaluating architectural trade-offs
  • Preparing a TDD-driven implementation plan

Architecture Planning Workflow

1. Understand the Requirement

Before drawing boxes:

  • Identify the user-facing goal (what changes for the user?)
  • Identify the system boundary (what components are touched?)
  • Identify external dependencies (APIs, databases, queues, third-party services)

2. Component Breakdown

Break the feature into layers:

Request → Route/Handler → Service → Repository → Database
                       ↓
                   External APIs

For each component define:

  • Responsibility — single sentence
  • Inputs / Outputs — types, not just names
  • Error cases — what can go wrong and how it surfaces

3. Data Flow Diagram

Map the happy path first, then edge cases:

Client
  │ POST /feature
  ▼
Handler (validates input, calls service)
  │
  ▼
Service (business logic, orchestrates)
  │         │
  ▼         ▼
Repo     External API
  │
  ▼
Database

4. Dependency Map

| Component | Depends On | Depended By | |-----------|-----------|-------------| | Handler | Service | Client | | Service | Repo, External API | Handler | | Repo | Database | Service |

5. API Contracts

Define contracts before implementation:

# Input schema
class CreateFeatureRequest(BaseModel):
    name: str
    config: dict[str, Any]

# Output schema
class FeatureResponse(BaseModel):
    id: UUID
    name: str
    created_at: datetime

# Error cases
# 400 — validation error
# 404 — dependency not found
# 409 — conflict (already exists)
# 500 — upstream failure

6. Implementation Phases

Split into parallel-safe phases for TDD execution:

Phase 1 — Data layer (Demeter)
  - Migration: create table
  - Model: ORM class
  - Repository: CRUD methods + tests

Phase 2 — Service layer (Hermes) [depends on Phase 1]
  - Service class: business logic + tests
  - External API client + mock tests

Phase 3 — API layer (Hermes) [depends on Phase 2]
  - Route handler + tests
  - Request/response schemas

Phase 4 — Frontend (Aphrodite) [can parallel Phase 2+3]
  - Component tree
  - API integration
  - Tests

Architectural Trade-offs Checklist

Before finalizing the plan, evaluate:

  • [ ] Coupling — are components independently testable?
  • [ ] Reversibility — can this be rolled back without data loss?
  • [ ] Performance — any N+1 queries or blocking I/O?
  • [ ] Security — input validation at boundary? Auth checked?
  • [ ] Observability — can failures be traced end-to-end?
  • [ ] Scalability — does this break under 10x load?

Output Format

The plan output should be a PLAN-<feature>.md artifact:

# PLAN-<feature>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD  **Status:** Awaiting Approval

## Goal
[One sentence]

## Component Breakdown
[Table: Component | Responsibility | Inputs | Outputs]

## Data Flow
[ASCII diagram]

## API Contracts
[Key schemas and error codes]

## Phases
1. Phase 1 — @demeter — [scope]
2. Phase 2 — @hermes — [scope]
3. Phase 3 — @aphrodite — [scope] (parallel with Phase 2)

## Risks
- [Risk and mitigation]

## Open Questions
- [ ] [Decision needed from human]