Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. Ifshared/is missing, fetch files via WebFetch fromhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.
Automated Test Planner
Type: L3 Worker
Creates Story test task with comprehensive automated test coverage (E2E/Integration/Unit) based on Risk-Based Testing methodology and REAL manual testing results.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Source | Description |
|-------|----------|--------|-------------|
| storyId | Yes | args, git branch, kanban, user | Story to process |
Resolution: Story Resolution Chain. Status filter: To Review
Purpose & Scope
- Create comprehensive test task for Story automation
- Calculate risk-based priorities (Impact x Probability)
- Generate 11-section test plan from manual test results
- Delegate to ln-301-task-creator (CREATE) or ln-302-task-replanner (REPLAN)
- NOT for: manual testing (ln-522), research (ln-521), orchestration (ln-520)
When to Use
- Use when implementation work is done and automated test coverage must be planned
- All implementation Tasks in Story status = Done
- ln-521 research: uses if available, generates minimal inline research if missing
- ln-522 manual testing: uses if available, marks as 'skipped by policy' if missing
Automation: Supports autoApprove: true (default when invoked by ln-520) to skip manual confirmation.
Workflow
Phase 0: Tools Config
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/tools_config_guide.md, shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md, and shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md
Extract: task_provider = Task Management → Provider (linear | file).
Phase 1: Discovery (Automated)
- Resolve storyId: Run Story Resolution Chain per guide (status filter: [To Review]).
- Auto-discover Team ID from
docs/tasks/kanban_board.md(see CLAUDE.md "Configuration Auto-Discovery")
Phase 2: Story + Tasks Analysis (NO Dialog)
Step 0: Study Project Test Files
- Scan for test-related files:
- tests/README.md (commands, setup, environment)
- Test configs (jest.config.js, vitest.config.ts, pytest.ini)
- Existing test structure (tests/, tests/ directories)
- Coverage config (.coveragerc, coverage.json)
- Extract: test commands, framework, patterns, coverage thresholds
- Ensures test planning aligns with project practices
Step 1: Load Research and Manual Test Results
- Fetch Story (must have label "user-story"):
- IF
task_provider=linear:get_issue(storyId)— extract Story.id (UUID, NOT short ID) - IF
task_provider=file:Read story.md— extract Story metadata
- IF
- Load research comment (from ln-521): "## Test Research: {Feature}"
- IF
task_provider=linear:list_comments(issueId=storyId)→ find matching comment - IF
task_provider=file:Glob("docs/tasks/epics/*/stories/*/comments/*.md")→ find matching comment - IF research comment not found: generate 3-5 bullet points of key test areas based on Story AC and task descriptions (inline, no external research).
- IF
- Load manual test results comment (from ln-522): "## Manual Testing Results"
- Same approach as research comment above
- IF manual test results not found: skip manual test coverage analysis. Note in output: 'Manual testing: skipped by policy (simplified mode).'
- Parse sections: AC results (PASS/FAIL), Edge Cases, Error Handling, Integration flows
- Map to test design: PASSED AC -> E2E, Edge cases -> Unit, Errors -> Error handling, Flows -> Integration
Step 2: Analyze Story + Tasks
- Parse Story: Goal, Test Strategy, Technical Notes
- Fetch all child Tasks (status = Done):
- IF
task_provider=linear:list_issues(parentId=Story.id, state="Done") - IF
task_provider=file:Glob("docs/tasks/epics/*/stories/*/tasks/*.md")→ filter by**Status:** Done
- IF
- Analyze each Task:
- Components implemented
- Business logic added
- Integration points created
- Conditional branches (if/else/switch)
- Identify what needs testing
Phase 3: Parsing Strategy for Manual Test Results
Process: Locate Linear comment with "Manual Testing Results" header -> Verify Format Version 1.0 -> Extract structured sections (Acceptance Criteria, Test Results by AC, Edge Cases, Error Handling, Integration Testing) using regex -> Validate (at least 1 PASSED AC, AC count matches Story, completeness check) -> Map parsed data to test design structure
Error Handling: Missing comment -> use fallback (inline research or skip per Phase 2 logic), Missing format version -> WARNING (try legacy parsing), Required section missing -> use fallback, No PASSED AC -> ERROR (fix implementation)
Phase 4: Risk-Based Test Planning (Automated)
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/risk_based_testing_guide.md for complete methodology.
E2E-First Approach: Prioritize by business risk (Priority = Impact x Probability), not coverage metrics.
Workflow:
Step 1: Risk Assessment
Calculate Priority for each scenario from manual testing:
Priority = Business Impact (1-5) x Probability (1-5)
Decision Criteria:
- Priority ≥15 -> MUST test
- Priority 9-14 -> SHOULD test if not covered
- Priority <=8 -> SKIP (manual testing sufficient)
Step 2: E2E Test Selection (2-5): Baseline 2 (positive + negative) ALWAYS + 0-3 additional (Priority ≥15 only)
Step 3: Unit Test Selection (0-15): DEFAULT 0. Add ONLY for complex business logic (Priority ≥15): financial, security, algorithms
Step 4: Integration Test Selection: DEFAULT 0. Add ONLY if E2E gaps AND Priority ≥15: rollback, concurrency, external API errors
Step 5: Validation: Each test passes Usefulness Criteria (Priority ≥15, Confidence ROI, Behavioral, Predictive, Specific, Non-Duplicative)
Phase 5: Test Task Generation (Automated)
Generates complete test task per test_task_template.md (11 sections):
Sections 1-7: Context, Risk Matrix, E2E/Integration/Unit Tests (with Priority scores + justifications), Coverage, DoD
Section 8: Existing Tests to Fix (analysis of affected tests from implementation tasks)
Section 9: Infrastructure Changes (packages, Docker, configs - based on test dependencies)
Section 10: Documentation Updates (README, CHANGELOG, tests/README, config docs)
Section 11: Legacy Code Cleanup (deprecated patterns, backward compat, dead code)
Shows preview for review.
Phase 6: Confirmation & Delegation
Step 1: Preview generated test plan (always displayed for transparency)
Step 2: Confirmation logic:
- autoApprove: true (default from ln-520) -> proceed automatically
- Manual run -> prompt user to type "confirm"
Step 3: Check for existing test task
- IF
task_provider=linear:list_issues(parentId=Story.id, label="tests") - IF
task_provider=file:Glob("docs/tasks/epics/*/stories/*/tasks/*.md")→ filter by**Labels:**containingtests
Decision:
- Count = 0 -> CREATE MODE (Step 4a)
- Count >= 1 -> REPLAN MODE (Step 4b)
Step 4a: CREATE MODE (if Count = 0)
Invoke ln-301-task-creator worker with taskType: "test"
Pass to worker:
- taskType, teamId, storyData (Story.id, title, AC, Technical Notes, Context)
- researchFindings (from ln-521 comment)
- manualTestResults (from ln-522 comment)
- testPlan (e2eTests, integrationTests, unitTests, riskPriorityMatrix)
- infrastructureChanges, documentationUpdates, legacyCleanup
Worker returns: Task URL + summary
Step 4b: REPLAN MODE (if Count >= 1)
Invoke ln-302-task-replanner worker with taskType: "test"
Pass to worker:
- Same data as CREATE MODE + existingTaskIds
Worker returns: Operations summary + warnings
Step 5: Return summary to orchestrator (ln-520)
Runtime Summary Artifact
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/test_planning_summary_contract.md
Accept optional summaryArtifactPath.
Summary kind:
test-planning-worker
Required payload semantics:
worker = "ln-523"statuswarningstest_task_idtest_task_urlcoverage_summaryplanned_scenarios
Write the summary to the provided artifact path or return the same envelope in structured output.
Definition of Done
Research and Manual Results Loaded:
- [ ] Research comment "## Test Research: {Feature}" found (from ln-521)
- [ ] Manual test results "## Manual Testing Results" found (from ln-522)
- [ ] At least 1 AC marked as PASSED
Risk-Based Test Plan Generated:
- [ ] Risk Priority Matrix calculated for all scenarios
- [ ] E2E tests: Baseline positive + negative, additional only if Priority ≥15
- [ ] Integration tests: ONLY if E2E doesn't cover AND Priority ≥15
- [ ] Unit tests: ONLY complex business logic with Priority ≥15
- [ ] Each test passes all 6 Usefulness Criteria
- [ ] No framework/library testing: Each test validates OUR business logic only
Test Task Description Complete (11 sections):
- [ ] All 11 sections populated per template
- [ ] Risk Priority Matrix included
- [ ] Each test beyond baseline 2 justified
Worker Delegation Executed:
- [ ] CREATE MODE: Delegated to ln-301-task-creator
- [ ] REPLAN MODE: Delegated to ln-302-task-replanner
- [ ] Linear Issue URL returned
Output:
- CREATE MODE: Linear Issue URL + confirmation
- REPLAN MODE: Operations summary + URLs
Reference Files
- Tools config:
shared/references/tools_config_guide.md - Storage mode operations:
shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md - Risk-based testing methodology:
shared/references/risk_based_testing_guide.md - Auto-discovery patterns:
shared/references/auto_discovery_pattern.md - Test task template:
shared/templates/test_task_template.md(workers ln-301/ln-302 load via Template Loading) - Testing examples:
references/risk_based_testing_examples.md - MANDATORY READ:
shared/references/research_tool_fallback.md
Critical Rules
- Manual results preferred: Use ln-522 manual testing results when available. When missing (simplified mode), generate minimal inline research and mark manual testing as skipped
- E2E-first, not unit-first: Baseline is always 2 E2E (positive + negative); unit/integration added only for Priority >= 15
- No framework testing: Every test must validate OUR business logic; never test library/framework behavior
- Usefulness enforcement: Every test beyond baseline must pass all 6 Usefulness Criteria (see risk_based_testing_guide.md)
- Delegate, don't create: Task creation goes through ln-301/ln-302 workers; this skill generates the plan only
Best Practices
Minimum Viable Testing: Start with baseline E2E (positive + negative). Each additional test must pass all 6 Usefulness Criteria.
Risk-Based Testing: Prioritize by Business Impact x Probability. E2E-first from ACTUAL manual testing results. Priority ≥15 scenarios covered by tests.
Expected-Based Testing: For deterministic tests, compare actual vs expected using diff. MANDATORY READ: Load ../ln-522-manual-tester/SKILL.md — section "Test Design Principles".
Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-15