Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. Ifshared/is missing, fetch files via WebFetch fromhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.
Coverage Gaps Auditor (L3 Worker)
Type: L3 Worker
Specialized worker identifying missing tests for critical business logic.
Purpose & Scope
- Audit Coverage Gaps (Category 4: High Priority)
- Identify untested critical paths
- Classify by category (Money, Security, Data, Core Flows)
- Calculate compliance score (X/10)
Inputs
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, testFilesMetadata, codebase_root, output_dir.
Domain-aware: Supports domain_mode + current_domain (see audit_output_schema.md#domain-aware-worker-output).
Workflow
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.
-
Parse context -- extract fields, determine
scan_path(domain-aware if specified) ELSE: scan_path = codebase_root domain_name = null -
Identify critical paths in scan_path (not entire codebase)
- Scan production code in
scan_pathfor money/security/data keywords - All Grep/Glob patterns use
scan_path(not codebase_root) - Example:
Grep(pattern="payment|refund|discount", path=scan_path)
- Scan production code in
-
Check test coverage for each critical path (Layer 1)
- Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- Match by function name, module name, or test description 3b) Context Analysis (Layer 2 -- MANDATORY): For each gap candidate, ask:
- Is this function already covered by E2E/integration test? -> downgrade to LOW
- Is this a helper function with <10 lines called from tested code? -> skip
- Is keyword match a false positive (e.g.,
paymentIcon()is UI, not payment logic)? -> skip
-
Collect missing tests
- Tag each finding with
domain: domain_name(if domain-aware)
- Tag each finding with
-
Calculate Score: Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)
-
Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per
shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md(or{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.mdif domain-aware) in single Write call -
Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)
Critical Paths Classification
1. Money Flows (Priority 20+)
What: Any code handling financial transactions
Examples:
- Payment processing (
/payment,processPayment()) - Discounts/promotions (
calculateDiscount(),applyPromoCode()) - Tax calculations (
calculateTax(),getTaxRate()) - Refunds (
processRefund(),/refund) - Invoices/billing (
generateInvoice(),createBill()) - Currency conversion (
convertCurrency())
Min Priority: 20
Why Critical: Money loss, fraud, legal compliance
2. Security Flows (Priority 20+)
What: Authentication, authorization, encryption
Examples:
- Login/logout (
/login,authenticate()) - Token refresh (
/refresh-token,refreshAccessToken()) - Password reset (
/forgot-password,resetPassword()) - Permissions/RBAC (
checkPermission(),hasRole()) - Encryption/hashing (custom crypto logic, NOT bcrypt/argon2)
- API key validation (
validateApiKey())
Min Priority: 20
Why Critical: Security breach, data leak, unauthorized access
3. Data Integrity (Priority 15+)
What: CRUD operations, transactions, validation
Examples:
- Critical CRUD (
createUser(),deleteOrder(),updateProduct()) - Database transactions (
withTransaction()) - Data validation (custom validators, NOT framework defaults)
- Data migrations (
runMigration()) - Unique constraints (
checkDuplicateEmail())
Min Priority: 15
Why Critical: Data corruption, lost data, inconsistent state
4. Core User Journeys (Priority 15+)
What: Multi-step flows critical to business
Examples:
- Registration -> Email verification -> Onboarding
- Search -> Product details -> Add to cart -> Checkout
- Upload file -> Process -> Download result
- Submit form -> Approval workflow -> Notification
Min Priority: 15
Why Critical: Broken user flow = lost customers
Audit Rules
1. Identify Critical Paths
Process:
- Scan codebase for money-related keywords:
payment,refund,discount,tax,price,currency - Scan for security keywords:
auth,login,password,token,permission,encrypt - Scan for data keywords:
transaction,validation,migration,constraint - Scan for user journeys: multi-step flows in routes/controllers
2. Check Test Coverage
For each critical path:
- Search test files for matching test name/description
- If NO test found -> add to missing tests list
- If test found but inadequate (only positive, no edge cases) -> add to gaps list
3. Categorize Gaps
Severity by Priority:
- CRITICAL: Priority 20+ (Money, Security)
- HIGH: Priority 15-19 (Data, Core Flows)
- MEDIUM: Priority 10-14 (Important but not critical)
- Downgrade when: Function already covered by E2E test -> LOW. Helper with <10 lines called from tested code -> skip
4. Provide Justification
For each missing test:
- Explain WHY it's critical (money loss, security breach, etc.)
- Suggest test type (E2E, Integration, Unit)
- Estimate effort (S/M/L)
Scoring Algorithm
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.
Severity mapping by Priority:
- Priority 20+ (Money, Security) missing test -> CRITICAL
- Priority 15-19 (Data Integrity, Core Flows) missing test -> HIGH
- Priority 10-14 (Important) missing test -> MEDIUM
- Priority <10 (Nice-to-have) -> LOW
Output Format
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.
Write JSON summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.
Write report to {output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md (global) or {output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md (domain-aware) with category: "Coverage Gaps" and checks: money_flow_coverage, security_flow_coverage, data_integrity_coverage, core_journey_coverage.
Return summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md.
When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.
Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-634--{identifier}.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)
Critical Rules
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
- Domain-aware scanning: If
domain_mode="domain-aware", scan ONLYscan_pathproduction code (not entire codebase) - Tag findings: Include
domainfield in each finding when domain-aware - Test search scope: Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- Match by name: Use function name, module name, or test description to match tests to production code
Definition of Done
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
- [ ] contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir, domain_mode, current_domain)
- [ ] scan_path determined (domain path or codebase root)
- [ ] Critical paths identified in scan_path (Money, Security, Data, Core Flows)
- [ ] Test coverage checked for each critical path
- [ ] Missing tests collected with severity, priority, justification, domain
- [ ] Score calculated using penalty algorithm
- [ ] Report written to
{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.mdorln-634--{identifier}.md(atomic single Write call) - [ ] Summary written per contract
Reference Files
- Audit output schema:
shared/references/audit_output_schema.md
Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23