Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. Ifshared/is missing, fetch files via WebFetch fromhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.
Layer Boundary Auditor
Type: L3 Worker
L3 Worker that audits architectural layer boundaries and detects violations.
Purpose & Scope
- Read architecture.md to discover project's layer structure
- Detect layer violations (I/O code outside infrastructure layer)
- Detect cross-layer consistency issues:
- Transaction boundaries (commit/rollback ownership)
- Session ownership (DI vs local)
- Check pattern coverage (all HTTP calls use client abstraction)
- Detect error handling duplication
- Return violations list to coordinator
Out of Scope (owned by ln-628-concurrency-auditor):
- Blocking I/O in async functions (sync open/read in async def)
- Fire-and-forget tasks (create_task without error handler)
Input (from ln-640)
- architecture_path: string # Path to docs/architecture.md
- codebase_root: string # Root directory to scan
- skip_violations: string[] # Files to skip (legacy)
- output_dir: string # e.g., ".hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report"
# Domain-aware (optional, from coordinator)
- domain_mode: "global" | "domain-aware" # Default: "global"
- current_domain: string # e.g., "users", "billing" (only if domain-aware)
- scan_path: string # e.g., "src/users/" (only if domain-aware)
When domain_mode="domain-aware": Use scan_path instead of codebase_root for all Grep/Glob operations. Tag all findings with domain field.
Workflow
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.
Phase 1: Discover Architecture
MANDATORY READ: Load ../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/layer_rules.md -- use Architecture Presets (fallback), I/O Pattern Boundary Rules (Phase 2), Coverage Checks (Phase 4), Cross-Layer Consistency rules (Phase 3).
Read docs/architecture.md
Extract from Section 4.2 (Top-Level Decomposition):
- architecture_type: "Layered" | "Hexagonal" | "Clean" | "MVC" | etc.
- layers: [{name, directories[], purpose}]
Extract from Section 5.3 (Infrastructure Layer Components):
- infrastructure_components: [{name, responsibility}]
IF architecture.md not found:
Use fallback presets from layer_rules.md
Build ruleset:
FOR EACH layer:
allowed_deps = layers that can be imported
forbidden_deps = layers that cannot be imported
Graph acceleration (if available): IF contextStore.graph_indexed OR .hex-skills/codegraph/index.db exists:
- Module coupling:
analyze_architecture(path=scan_root, verbosity="full")-- use returned coupling metrics to identify tightly-coupled layers. - Cross-layer calls:
find_references(symbol)for transaction/session functions -- trace commit/rollback ownership across layers. - Orchestration depth:
trace_paths(name="ServiceFn", file="...", path_kind="calls", direction="forward", depth=3, path=scan_root)-- measure chain depth for flat orchestration check from a concrete service symbol. - Empty
trace_pathsfrom a coarse or module-level selector is not enough to clear a layer; fall back toinspect_symbolor grep/manual review when the selector is broad. - Fall back to grep-based detection below if graph unavailable.
Phase 2: Detect Layer Violations
scan_root = scan_path IF domain_mode == "domain-aware" ELSE codebase_root
FOR EACH violation_type IN layer_rules.md I/O Pattern Boundary Rules:
grep_pattern = violation_type.detection_grep
forbidden_dirs = violation_type.forbidden_in
matches = Grep(grep_pattern, scan_root, include="*.py,*.ts,*.js")
FOR EACH match IN matches:
IF match.path NOT IN skip_violations:
IF any(forbidden IN match.path FOR forbidden IN forbidden_dirs):
violations.append({
type: "layer_violation",
severity: "HIGH",
pattern: violation_type.name,
file: match.path,
line: match.line,
code: match.context,
allowed_in: violation_type.allowed_in,
suggestion: f"Move to {violation_type.allowed_in}"
})
Phase 3: Cross-Layer Consistency Checks
3.1 Transaction Boundary Violations
What: commit()/rollback() called at inconsistent layers (repo + service + API)
Detection:
repo_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/repositories/**/*.py")
service_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/services/**/*.py")
api_commits = Grep("\.commit\(\)|\.rollback\(\)", "**/api/**/*.py")
layers_with_commits = count([repo_commits, service_commits, api_commits].filter(len > 0))
Safe Patterns (ignore):
- Comment "# best-effort telemetry" in same context
- File ends with
_callbacks.py(progress notifiers) - Explicit
# UoW boundarycomment
Violation Rules:
| Condition | Severity | Issue | |-----------|----------|-------| | layers_with_commits >= 3 | CRITICAL | Mixed UoW ownership across all layers | | repo + api commits | HIGH | Transaction control bypasses service layer | | repo + service commits | HIGH | Ambiguous UoW owner (repo vs service) | | service + api commits | MEDIUM | Transaction control spans service + API |
Exception: Saga pattern / distributed transactions with explicit compensating actions -> downgrade CRITICAL to MEDIUM. UoW boundary documented with // architecture decision or ADR -> skip.
Recommendation: Choose single UoW owner (service layer recommended), remove commit() from other layers
Effort: L (requires architectural decision + refactoring)
3.2 Session Ownership Violations
What: Mixed DI-injected and locally-created sessions in same call chain
Detection:
di_session = Grep("Depends\(get_session\)|Depends\(get_db\)", "**/api/**/*.py")
local_session = Grep("AsyncSessionLocal\(\)|async_sessionmaker", "**/services/**/*.py")
local_in_repo = Grep("AsyncSessionLocal\(\)", "**/repositories/**/*.py")
Violation Rules:
| Condition | Severity | Issue | |-----------|----------|-------| | di_session AND local_in_repo in same module | HIGH | Repo creates own session while API injects different | | local_session in service calling DI-based repo | MEDIUM | Session mismatch in call chain |
Recommendation: Use DI consistently OR use local sessions consistently. Document exceptions (e.g., telemetry)
Effort: M
3.3 Flat Orchestration Violations
What: Service-layer functions calling other services that call yet other services -- deep orchestration chains.
Detection: MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/ai_ready_architecture.md -- map service imports, find chain depth.
Violation Rules:
| Condition | Severity | Issue | |-----------|----------|-------| | Service chain >= 3 (A->B->C->D) | HIGH | Deep orchestration | | Service chain = 2 (A->B->C) | MEDIUM | Consider flattening |
Recommendation: Extract orchestrator calling all services at same level. Each service becomes a sink.
Effort: L
Phase 4: Check Pattern Coverage
# HTTP Client Coverage
all_http_calls = Grep("httpx\\.|aiohttp\\.|requests\\.", codebase_root)
abstracted_calls = Grep("client\\.(get|post|put|delete)", infrastructure_dirs)
IF len(all_http_calls) > 0:
coverage = len(abstracted_calls) / len(all_http_calls) * 100
IF coverage < 90%:
violations.append({
type: "low_coverage",
severity: "MEDIUM",
pattern: "HTTP Client Abstraction",
coverage: coverage,
uncovered_files: files with direct calls outside infrastructure
})
# Error Handling Duplication
http_error_handlers = Grep("except\\s+(httpx\\.|aiohttp\\.|requests\\.)", codebase_root)
unique_files = set(f.path for f in http_error_handlers)
IF len(unique_files) > 2:
violations.append({
type: "duplication",
severity: "MEDIUM",
pattern: "HTTP Error Handling",
files: list(unique_files),
suggestion: "Centralize in infrastructure layer"
})
Phase 5: Calculate Score
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.
Phase 6: Write Report
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.
Write JSON summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.
# Build markdown report in memory with:
# - AUDIT-META (standard penalty-based: score, counts)
# - Checks table (io_isolation, http_abstraction, error_centralization, transaction_boundary, session_ownership)
# - Findings table (violations sorted by severity)
# - DATA-EXTENDED: {architecture, coverage}
IF domain_mode == "domain-aware":
Write to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary-{current_domain}.md
ELSE:
Write to {output_dir}/642-layer-boundary.md
Phase 7: Return Summary
Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/642-layer-boundary-users.md
Score: 4.5/10 | Issues: 8 (C:1 H:3 M:4 L:0)
Critical Rules
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
- Read architecture.md first - never assume architecture type
- Skip violations list - respect legacy files marked for gradual fix
- File + line + code - always provide exact location with context
- Actionable suggestions - always tell WHERE to move the code
- No false positives - verify path contains forbidden dir, not just substring
Definition of Done
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
- [ ] Architecture discovered from docs/architecture.md (or fallback used)
- [ ] All violation types from layer_rules.md checked
- [ ] Cross-layer consistency checked:
- Transaction boundaries analyzed (commit/rollback distribution)
- Session ownership analyzed (DI vs local)
- [ ] Coverage calculated for HTTP abstraction + 2 consistency metrics
- [ ] Violations list with severity, location, suggestion
- [ ] If domain-aware: all Grep scoped to scan_path, findings tagged with domain
- [ ] Report written to
{output_dir}/642-layer-boundary[-{domain}].md(atomic single Write call) - [ ] Summary written per contract
Reference Files
- Layer rules:
../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/layer_rules.md - Scoring impact:
../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/scoring_rules.md
Version: 2.1.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-08