Agent Skills: Pipeline Diagnostics

Pipeline health assessment with coverage ratios, conversion benchmarks, velocity analysis, and problem diagnosis frameworks.

UncategorizedID: majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace/pipeline-diagnostics

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace/tree/HEAD/plugins/majestic-sales/skills/pipeline-diagnostics

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for pipeline-diagnostics.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

plugins/majestic-sales/skills/pipeline-diagnostics/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
pipeline-diagnostics
Description
Pipeline health assessment with coverage ratios, conversion benchmarks, velocity analysis, and problem diagnosis frameworks.

Pipeline Diagnostics

Framework for assessing B2B sales pipeline health and identifying problems.

Pipeline Coverage

Minimum Coverage by Quarter Week:

| Week | Coverage Needed | Why | |------|-----------------|-----| | Week 1 | 4x quota | Time to work deals | | Week 5 | 3x quota | Deals maturing | | Week 9 | 2x quota | Late-stage heavy | | Week 13 | 1.2x quota | Commit deals |

Formula:

Coverage Ratio = Total Pipeline / Quota Target

Stage Conversion Benchmarks

| Stage | Benchmark | If Below | |-------|-----------|----------| | Lead to Qualified | 30-40% | ICP targeting issue | | Qualified to Discovery | 60-70% | Qualification criteria issue | | Discovery to Demo | 50-60% | Discovery quality issue | | Demo to Proposal | 40-50% | Demo effectiveness issue | | Proposal to Closed | 30-40% | Negotiation/pricing issue |

Deal Velocity

Formula:

Sales Velocity = (Deals × Win Rate × ACV) / Sales Cycle

Higher velocity = more revenue, faster

Improvement Levers:

  1. More qualified opportunities (volume)
  2. Higher win rate (quality)
  3. Larger deal sizes (ACV)
  4. Shorter sales cycles (speed)

Stage Distribution Analysis

Healthy Pipeline Shape:

Stage 1 (Qualified):    ████████████████████ 35%
Stage 2 (Discovery):    ████████████████ 25%
Stage 3 (Demo):         ████████████ 20%
Stage 4 (Proposal):     ████████ 12%
Stage 5 (Negotiation):  █████ 8%

Red Flags:
- Top-heavy: Too much early stage
- Bottom-heavy: Not enough new pipeline
- Middle stuck: Conversion problem

Age Analysis

| Stage | Healthy Age | Stale Threshold | |-------|-------------|-----------------| | Qualified | 0-14 days | >21 days | | Discovery | 7-21 days | >30 days | | Demo | 14-30 days | >45 days | | Proposal | 7-14 days | >21 days | | Negotiation | 7-21 days | >30 days |

Stale Deal Actions:

  • <7 days stale: Update and next steps
  • 7-14 days stale: Manager review
  • 14 days stale: Downgrade or close

Win/Loss Analysis

Win Analysis Questions:

  • What was the trigger event?
  • Who was the champion?
  • What was the competitive situation?
  • What value resonated most?
  • How long was the sales cycle?

Loss Analysis Questions:

  • What stage did we lose?
  • Who made the decision?
  • What was the stated reason?
  • What was the real reason?
  • What would we do differently?

Problem Diagnosis

Not Enough Pipeline

Symptoms:

  • Coverage <3x in first half of quarter
  • New pipeline creation slowing
  • Deals closing without replacement

Solutions:

  • Increase outbound activity 50%
  • Run targeted campaign to ICP
  • Re-engage closed-lost from 6+ months ago
  • Ask for referrals from recent wins
  • Partner-sourced pipeline push

Deals Stuck in Stage

Symptoms:

  • Average age exceeds benchmark
  • Same deals appearing in reviews
  • No clear next steps

Solutions:

  • Implement stage exit criteria
  • Add "days in stage" to dashboards
  • Manager review for stale deals
  • Create urgency with limited-time offer
  • Multi-thread to other stakeholders

Low Win Rate

Symptoms:

  • Win rate <20%
  • Losing to "no decision"
  • Losing to specific competitor

Solutions:

  • Tighten qualification criteria
  • Improve discovery process
  • Build champion enablement
  • Create competitive battle cards
  • Address pricing/packaging

Inaccurate Forecasts

Symptoms:

  • Consistent over/under forecasting
  • Deals slipping between periods
  • Late-quarter surprises

Solutions:

  • Define clear commit criteria
  • Weekly deal-by-deal review
  • Track forecast accuracy by rep
  • Implement deal scoring
  • Require close plan for commits