Deep Research
<identity> Deep Research Skill — Multi-step autonomous research methodology for structured, evidence-based investigation and synthesis. </identity> <capabilities> - 5-phase autonomous research workflow (Scope → Search → Synthesis → Validation → Report) - Multi-source evidence gathering with cross-validation - Structured output with citations and confidence ratings - Gap detection and iterative depth expansion - Actionable recommendation generation </capabilities>When to Use
- Task requires investigation across multiple sources before drawing a conclusion
- Evidence-based answers needed, not pattern-matched guesses
- Question spans multiple domains and needs synthesis
- Accuracy of findings is critical to downstream decisions
Trigger phrases: "research", "investigate", "deep dive", "find evidence for", "comprehensive analysis of"
Iron Law
Never synthesize without reading sources. Every claim in the final report must trace to a source retrieved during Phase 2.
5-Phase Process
Phase 1: Scope — Restate as one research question. Define 3–5 sub-questions, success criteria, constraints, and non-goals. Cannot proceed without a written scope block.
Phase 2: Multi-Source Search — Run 3+ WebSearch queries. WebFetch each source URL. pnpm search:code for prior-art. Maintain evidence log: URL, claim, confidence (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), sub-question. Each sub-question needs ≥2 independent sources.
Phase 3: Synthesis — Group evidence by sub-question. CONSENSUS (2+ sources) → HIGH; CONFLICT → LOW, flag for user. Build synthesis matrix. Label unsupported claims [UNVERIFIED].
Phase 4: Validation
- [ ] Source freshness — appropriate time period?
- [ ] Contradiction check — resolve or flag CONFLICT items.
- [ ] Assumption audit — 3 assumptions stated explicitly?
- [ ] Scope alignment — each finding maps to a Phase 1 sub-question?
- [ ] Confidence calibration — downgrade single-source HIGH ratings.
Phase 5: Report — Save to .claude/context/reports/backend/<topic>-research-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md with sections: Executive Summary, Findings (finding + confidence + evidence per sub-question), Conflicts, Recommended Actions, Knowledge Gaps, Sources.
Tool Usage
| Tool | Phase | Purpose |
| --------------- | ----- | ----------------------------- |
| WebSearch | 2A | Broad source discovery |
| WebFetch | 2B | Extract content from URLs |
| Read / Grep | 2C | Search codebase for prior art |
| Write | 5 | Save report |
Output Locations
- Reports:
.claude/context/reports/backend/<topic>-research-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md - Evidence logs (temp):
.claude/context/tmp/research-evidence-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md
Search Protocol
pnpm search:code "<query>"— primary intent-based searchSkill({ skill: 'ripgrep' })— exact keyword/regex matchesWebSearch/WebFetch— external sourcesGrep— fallback for single-file targeted checks
Iron Laws
- NEVER proceed to Phase 3 without ≥2 sources per sub-question.
- ALWAYS save evidence log to tmp/ before Phase 3 — context resets lose unsaved evidence.
- ALWAYS label confidence explicitly — never present LOW-confidence as conclusion.
- NEVER paper over gaps — unknown answers must be flagged, not omitted.
- ALWAYS verify report file exists before marking task complete.
Anti-Patterns
- No scope block before searching → unfocused evidence, unsynthesizable
- Single source per claim → cross-validate with ≥2 independent sources
- Synthesizing while searching → introduces confirmation bias; complete Phase 2 first
- Omitting CONFLICT evidence → flag all conflicts explicitly in report
Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
Check for: prior reports on same topic (avoid duplicates), unreliable sources in issues.md, relevant ADRs in decisions.md.
After completing:
- New research pattern ->
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md - Unreliable source identified ->
.claude/context/memory/issues.md - Methodology decision ->
.claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Save evidence log and partial findings before Phase 3.