Agent-Skills.md

Agent Skills: Building Threat Hunt Hypothesis Framework

Build a systematic threat hunt hypothesis framework that transforms threat intelligence, attack patterns, and environmental data into testable hunting hypotheses.

UncategorizedID: plurigrid/asi/building-threat-hunt-hypothesis-framework

Repository

plurigrid/asi
plurigridLicense: MIT
165

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/plurigrid/asi/tree/HEAD/plugins/asi/skills/building-threat-hunt-hypothesis-framework

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for building-threat-hunt-hypothesis-framework.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

plugins/asi/skills/building-threat-hunt-hypothesis-framework/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
building-threat-hunt-hypothesis-framework
Description
Build a systematic threat hunt hypothesis framework that transforms threat intelligence, attack patterns, and environmental data into testable hunting hypotheses.

Building Threat Hunt Hypothesis Framework

When to Use

  • When proactively hunting for indicators of building threat hunt hypothesis framework in the environment
  • After threat intelligence indicates active campaigns using these techniques
  • During incident response to scope compromise related to these techniques
  • When EDR or SIEM alerts trigger on related indicators
  • During periodic security assessments and purple team exercises

Prerequisites

  • EDR platform with process and network telemetry (CrowdStrike, MDE, SentinelOne)
  • SIEM with relevant log data ingested (Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel)
  • Sysmon deployed with comprehensive configuration
  • Windows Security Event Log forwarding enabled
  • Threat intelligence feeds for IOC correlation

Workflow

  1. Formulate Hypothesis: Define a testable hypothesis based on threat intelligence or ATT&CK gap analysis.
  2. Identify Data Sources: Determine which logs and telemetry are needed to validate or refute the hypothesis.
  3. Execute Queries: Run detection queries against SIEM and EDR platforms to collect relevant events.
  4. Analyze Results: Examine query results for anomalies, correlating across multiple data sources.
  5. Validate Findings: Distinguish true positives from false positives through contextual analysis.
  6. Correlate Activity: Link findings to broader attack chains and threat actor TTPs.
  7. Document and Report: Record findings, update detection rules, and recommend response actions.

Key Concepts

| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | TA0001 | Initial Access | | TA0003 | Persistence | | TA0008 | Lateral Movement | | TA0010 | Exfiltration |

Tools & Systems

| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | CrowdStrike Falcon | EDR telemetry and threat detection | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Advanced hunting with KQL | | Splunk Enterprise | SIEM log analysis with SPL queries | | Elastic Security | Detection rules and investigation timeline | | Sysmon | Detailed Windows event monitoring | | Velociraptor | Endpoint artifact collection and hunting | | Sigma Rules | Cross-platform detection rule format |

Common Scenarios

  1. Scenario 1: Intelligence-driven hunt based on APT campaign report
  2. Scenario 2: ATT&CK coverage gap analysis driving hypothesis creation
  3. Scenario 3: Anomaly-driven hypothesis from UEBA alert investigation
  4. Scenario 4: Situational awareness hunt based on industry sector threats

Output Format

Hunt ID: TH-BUILDI-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Technique: TA0001
Host: [Hostname]
User: [Account context]
Evidence: [Log entries, process trees, network data]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
Recommended Action: [Containment, investigation, monitoring]