Agent-Skills.md

Agent Skills: Control Plan

Generate AIAG-format Control Plans linked to PFMEAs with proper inspection methods, frequencies, and reaction plans. Supports Prototype/Pre-launch/Production phases. USE WHEN user says 'control plan', 'CP', 'inspection plan', 'process control', 'sampling frequency', 'reaction plan', or 'special characteristics'. Integrates with PFMEA, AutomotiveManufacturing, and MSA skills.

UncategorizedID: robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure/Controlplan

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure/tree/HEAD/skills/Controlplan

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for Controlplan.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/Controlplan/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
Controlplan
Description
Generate AIAG-format Control Plans linked to PFMEAs with proper inspection methods, frequencies, and reaction plans. Supports Prototype/Pre-launch/Production phases. USE WHEN user says 'control plan', 'CP', 'inspection plan', 'process control', 'sampling frequency', 'reaction plan', or 'special characteristics'. Integrates with PFMEA, AutomotiveManufacturing, and MSA skills.

Control Plan

When to Activate This Skill

  • "Create a control plan for [part/process]"
  • "What inspection frequency for [characteristic]?"
  • "Define control methods for [operation]"
  • "Link PFMEA to control plan"
  • "What's the reaction plan for [out-of-spec condition]?"
  • "Develop prototype/pre-launch/production control plan"

Control Plan Phases

Prototype Control Plan

  • Purpose: Control during prototype build
  • Focus: Dimensional measurements, material tests, performance
  • Frequency: Often 100% on critical dimensions
  • Duration: Until prototype approval

Pre-Launch Control Plan

  • Purpose: Control during PPAP/validation runs
  • Focus: Enhanced inspection, process validation
  • Frequency: Increased sampling, SPC establishment
  • Duration: Until production approval (PSW)

Production Control Plan

  • Purpose: Ongoing production control
  • Focus: Standardized controls, sustained quality
  • Frequency: Based on process capability
  • Duration: Life of production

AIAG Control Plan Format

Required Columns

| Column | Description | Source | |--------|-------------|--------| | Part/Process Number | Operation step number | Process Flow | | Process Name/Description | Operation description | Process Flow | | Machine/Device/Jig/Tool | Equipment used | Process documentation | | Characteristic Number | Unique ID for characteristic | Sequential | | Product Characteristic | Part feature being controlled | Drawing, spec | | Process Characteristic | Process parameter affecting product | PFMEA | | Special Char Class | CC, SC, or blank | PFMEA/Drawing | | Product/Process Spec | Tolerance or requirement | Drawing, spec | | Evaluation/Measurement | Gage/method used | MSA | | Sample Size | Quantity inspected | Based on risk | | Sample Frequency | How often inspection occurs | Based on risk | | Control Method | How results are recorded/used | SPC, checklist, etc. | | Reaction Plan | Action when out of spec | Defined response |

Special Characteristics

Critical Characteristics (CC)

  • Symbol: Shield, (CC), or inverted delta
  • Criteria: Safety or regulatory compliance
  • Requirements:
    • Documented in Control Plan
    • Enhanced inspection (often 100%)
    • SPC required (Cpk ≥1.67)
    • Traceable records
    • Identified on drawing

Significant Characteristics (SC)

  • Symbol: Diamond, (SC)
  • Criteria: Fit, function, appearance significant to customer
  • Requirements:
    • Documented in Control Plan
    • Appropriate inspection frequency
    • SPC recommended (Cpk ≥1.33)
    • Records maintained

Standard Characteristics

  • Symbol: None
  • Criteria: All other characteristics
  • Requirements:
    • Documented in Control Plan
    • Sampling based on risk
    • Records as required

Sample Size and Frequency Guidelines

Based on Severity (from PFMEA)

| Severity | Sample Size | Frequency | Rationale | |----------|-------------|-----------|-----------| | 9-10 (Safety) | 100% | Every piece | Safety critical - no escape | | 7-8 (High) | 100% or n≥5 | Per hour or per lot | High customer impact | | 5-6 (Moderate) | n≥3 | Per shift or per setup | Moderate risk | | 1-4 (Low) | n≥1 | Per lot or periodic | Low risk |

Based on Process Capability

| Cpk Range | Typical Frequency | Notes | |-----------|-------------------|-------| | <1.00 | 100% or very frequent | Process not capable | | 1.00-1.33 | Every hour or more | Marginal capability | | 1.33-1.67 | Per shift or setup | Capable | | >1.67 | Per setup, daily, or lot | Highly capable |

Standard Frequency Terms

| Term | Meaning | When to Use | |------|---------|-------------| | Continuous | 100% inspection | Safety, high risk | | Per piece | Every part | Critical characteristics | | Per hour | n pieces every hour | SPC, high-risk | | Per shift | Start and end of shift | Setup-sensitive | | Per setup | At setup only | Stable characteristics | | Per lot | One sample per production lot | Low-risk, stable | | Daily | Once per day | Periodic verification | | Weekly | Once per week | Very stable |

Control Methods

Inspection Methods

| Method | Description | Typical Use | |--------|-------------|-------------| | Visual | Operator observation | Surface defects, presence | | Go/No-Go Gage | Attribute check | Hole size, thread, profile | | Caliper/Micrometer | Variable measurement | Dimensions | | CMM | Coordinate measurement | Complex features | | Height Gage | Surface plate measurement | Flatness, position | | Profilometer | Surface finish | Ra, Rz | | Hardness Tester | Material property | HRC, HRB | | Torque Wrench | Fastener torque | Assembly | | Leak Test | Seal integrity | Fluid systems | | Functional Test | Performance verification | End-of-line |

Recording Methods

| Method | Description | When to Use | |--------|-------------|-------------| | Check Sheet | Attribute recording | Visual checks, presence | | Data Log | Variable data recording | Measurements | | SPC Chart | Statistical control chart | Critical/significant | | Traveler | Part-specific record | Traceability | | Electronic | MES/database entry | High volume | | None (process control) | Poka-yoke, automated | Error-proofed |

Reaction Plans

Standard Reaction Plan Format

IF [out-of-spec condition] THEN:
1. STOP - Halt production/segregate suspect
2. CONTAIN - Quarantine affected parts
3. NOTIFY - Alert supervisor/quality
4. EVALUATE - Determine root cause and extent
5. CORRECT - Implement fix before restart
6. VERIFY - Confirm correction effective

Reaction Plan Examples

Dimension Out of Spec:

  1. Stop production
  2. Segregate last good part to current
  3. Notify Quality/Supervisor
  4. Check tool condition, offset, fixture
  5. Adjust/replace as needed
  6. Run first piece, verify to spec
  7. Inspect segregated parts 100%

Visual Defect:

  1. Reject defective part
  2. Assess severity (isolated vs trend)
  3. If trend: notify supervisor, review process
  4. Identify root cause (tool, material, handling)
  5. Implement correction
  6. Resume with enhanced attention

SPC Out of Control:

  1. Mark control chart
  2. Continue production if within spec
  3. Investigate pattern (rule violated)
  4. Identify assignable cause
  5. Implement correction
  6. Document on chart

PFMEA to Control Plan Linkage

Required Flow

PFMEA Item            →    Control Plan Entry
─────────────────          ───────────────────
Process Step          →    Part/Process Number
Function              →    Characteristic
Failure Mode          →    What we're preventing
Detection Control     →    Control Method
S/O/D Ratings         →    Sample Size/Frequency
Special Char          →    Special Char Class

Linkage Verification

For each Control Plan line, verify:

  • [ ] PFMEA has corresponding failure mode
  • [ ] Special characteristics match
  • [ ] Control method addresses PFMEA detection
  • [ ] Frequency appropriate for risk level
  • [ ] Reaction plan defined

Output Format

When generating Control Plan content:

# Control Plan
**Part Number**: [P/N]
**Part Name**: [Description]
**Customer**: [Customer Name]
**Control Plan Number**: CP-[DEPT]-[SEQ]
**Phase**: [ ] Prototype  [ ] Pre-Launch  [X] Production
**Revision**: [Rev] | **Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**PFMEA Reference**: PFMEA-[XXX]

## Operation: [Number] - [Name]

### Characteristic 1: [Description]

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Char No.** | [Unique ID] |
| **Product/Process** | Product / Process |
| **Class** | CC / SC / - |
| **Specification** | [Nominal ± Tolerance] |
| **Evaluation Method** | [Gage/Equipment] |
| **Sample Size** | [n] |
| **Sample Frequency** | [When] |
| **Control Method** | [Recording method] |
| **Reaction Plan** | [Reference or inline] |

Integration with Related Skills

PFMEA

Control Plan is direct output of PFMEA:

  • Every PFMEA detection control → Control Plan method
  • PFMEA severity drives inspection frequency
  • PFMEA updates trigger Control Plan review

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Pfmea/SKILL.md

MSA

All gages in Control Plan require MSA:

  • Gage R&R for variable gages
  • Attribute agreement for attribute gages
  • MSA acceptance before production approval

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Msa/SKILL.md

AutomotiveManufacturing

Work instructions must reflect Control Plan:

  • Inspection steps in work instructions
  • Operator-level control methods
  • Quality checkpoints documented

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Automotivemanufacturing/SKILL.md

Workflow Routing

| Trigger | What to do | |---------|-----------| | "create a control plan for [part / process]" | Pull PFMEA → enumerate ops → classify CCs/SCs → fill all 13 AIAG columns → emit phase-tagged CP markdown using the Output Format template above | | "what inspection frequency / sample size for [characteristic]?" | Cross-check PFMEA Severity table + Cpk table; recommend the stricter of the two; cite both rules in the answer | | "what's the reaction plan for [out-of-spec condition]?" | Match scenario to the Reaction Plan templates (Dimension OOS / Visual / SPC OOC); name responsibilities and timing explicitly — never "contact supervisor" alone | | "link PFMEA to control plan" / "verify PFMEA-CP linkage" | Run the Linkage Verification checklist for every CP line; flag any missing failure mode, mismatched CC/SC class, or missing reaction plan | | "review / audit my control plan" | Apply the Audit Preparation checklist from CLAUDE.md (current rev at point of use, MSA status, reaction-plan evidence, etc.) and report findings as a deficiency list | | "prototype / pre-launch / production control plan" | Use the matching phase row in Control Plan Phases; default sampling and SPC commitments differ between phases | | "special characteristic [CC / SC] — what controls?" | Apply the enhanced control requirements from CLAUDE.md (Cpk targets, MSA acceptance, error-proofing, traceability, annual review) |

Examples

Example 1 — New production control plan from PFMEA

User: "Create a production control plan for the damper rod machining operation. PFMEA shows OD diameter as a CC with Severity 9."

Output: Production-phase control plan markdown with one operation block — 100% CMM measurement (S=9 → no escape), Cpk ≥1.67 SPC requirement, X-bar/R chart with n=5 subgroups every hour, traceable record via MES, and a Type 1 "Stop and Contain" reaction plan referencing RP-CC-001 (segregate to last good, 100% sort suspect material, first-piece approval before restart).

Example 2 — Sampling frequency from severity + Cpk

User: "What sample size and frequency for a process characteristic with PFMEA Severity 7 and Cpk 1.45?"

Output: Stricter of the two rules wins. Severity 7-8 row says "100% or n≥5 per hour or per lot"; Cpk 1.33–1.67 says "per shift or setup". Recommendation: n≥5, per hour, X-bar/R SPC. Rationale citing both tables and the rule that high-severity overrides marginal capability advantages.

Example 3 — Reaction plan for an SPC trend, dimension still in spec

User: "My X-bar chart shows 7 points trending up but everything's still inside tolerance. What's the reaction plan?"

Output: SPC RP-SPC-002. Mark the chart (circle the rule violation, note WECO/Nelson rule number). Continue production since within spec. Investigate assignable cause — tool wear, fixture drift, incoming material. Implement correction. Document cause and action on the chart. Verify next 5 points return to control. Do NOT trigger Type 1 stop-and-contain because the part is still conforming.

Supplementary Resources

For detailed guidance: read ~/.claude/skills/Controlplan/CLAUDE.md

For templates: read ~/.claude/skills/Controlplan/templates/control-plan-template.md

For control method selection: read ~/.claude/skills/Controlplan/reference/control-methods.md

For sampling guidelines: read ~/.claude/skills/Controlplan/reference/sample-frequencies.md