Lead Magnet
Design and draft the free offer that turns strangers into subscribers. Governing principle: a lead magnet solves one specific problem fast, and the problem it solves must be the first step of the problem the paid offer solves — so consuming the magnet naturally creates demand for the product, instead of attracting freebie-hunters who will never buy.
When to use / when not to
- Use when building or fixing the top of an email funnel, or when list growth has stalled.
- If there's no clear positioning yet, run
skills/marketing/positioning-anglesfirst — the magnet's problem slice comes from the positioning claim. - The landing page that sells the magnet is
skills/marketing/direct-response-copy's job; the emails that deliver it and convert to paid areskills/marketing/email-sequences' job. Produce the spec + asset here, then hand off. - If the user wants a recurring free email (not a one-time asset), that's
skills/marketing/newsletter.
Intake
One batch; reuse artifacts from skills/marketing/orchestrator and skills/marketing/positioning-angles instead of re-asking:
- What paid offer should this magnet ultimately sell, and what problem does that offer solve?
- Who exactly is the ideal subscriber, and what's the most painful first step of that problem for them?
- What do you already have that could be repurposed (talks, docs, spreadsheets, processes, data)?
- Any delivery constraints — email platform, ability to host PDFs/video, willingness to maintain a tool?
Don't stall: with a known offer and audience, choose the problem slice yourself, state it as an assumption, and proceed.
Workflow
1. Pick the problem slice
Choose one narrow, urgent sub-problem of the paid offer's problem. Decision rules:
- Must be solvable in one sitting (the magnet's consumption, not a course of study).
- Must be upstream of the paid offer: solving it should surface the need the product fills ("audit reveals gaps → product fixes gaps").
- Reject slices that fully substitute for the paid offer (cannibalizes sales) and slices so broad any audience would want them (attracts the wrong list).
2. Choose the hook
Propose the 2 best-fitting hooks with example titles; the user picks one.
| Hook | Move | Example title | Works because | |---|---|---|---| | Quick win | Immediate result | "The 5-Minute Positioning Audit" | People want results fast | | Forbidden knowledge | Insider/secret frame | "The Positioning Secrets Top Agencies Don't Want You to Know" | Curiosity drives action | | Shortcut | Faster path | "The 30-Day Positioning Framework (Instead of 90)" | Time-saving is valued | | Social proof | Others' results | "How 500+ Founders Found Their Positioning in 30 Days" | Proof builds trust | | Diagnosis | Reveal their blind spot | "The Positioning Diagnostic: Discover Your Blind Spots" | Self-awareness drives action |
Decision rules: skeptical/jaded audience → social proof or diagnosis; impatient/busy audience → quick win or shortcut; sophisticated audience that's "seen everything" → diagnosis; forbidden knowledge only when there's a genuine insider angle. Social-proof hooks require real numbers — never invent them; if none exist, pick another hook.
3. Choose the format
Match format to the problem slice, not to fashion:
| Format | Best for | Rule of thumb | |---|---|---| | Checklist | Process the reader already roughly knows | Consumable in minutes | | Template | "Blank page" problems — they know what, not how to structure it | Fill-in-the-blanks, usable immediately | | Guide/workbook | Problems needing explanation before action | 5–20 pages, never more | | Audit/assessment | "I don't know what's wrong" problems | Scored questions → verdict | | Video course | Show-don't-tell topics | 3–5 short videos | | Spreadsheet/calculator | Numeric decisions | One clear output number |
Decision rules: diagnosis hook → audit/assessment format; quick win → checklist or template; shortcut → template or calculator. Prefer the format the user can build from existing assets (intake Q3). When two formats tie, pick the faster-to-consume one.
4. Validate before building
All five must pass, or return to the failing step:
- Solves exactly one problem (else → Step 1).
- The ideal customer wants it — not just anyone (else → Step 1).
- Deliverable immediately and automatically on signup (else → Step 3).
- Better than the competing free offers a search would surface (else sharpen the hook or slice).
- Consuming it makes the paid offer the obvious next step (else → Step 1).
5. Title and draft
Draft 3–5 title candidates varying the hook intensity; the user picks one. Titles must name the outcome and pass the specificity test ("The 10-Point Positioning Checklist", not "Free Marketing Guide"). Then draft the asset itself: checklists, templates, guides, and audits are drafted in full here; for video courses produce the script outline; for calculators produce the model logic and labels.
6. Hand off
Package the spec (format below) and route: landing page copy → skills/marketing/direct-response-copy; delivery + nurture emails → skills/marketing/email-sequences.
Required output format
# Lead Magnet Spec — [Title]
**Title:** [chosen] (runners-up: [2])
**Hook:** [type] — [why it fits this audience]
**Format:** [type] — [why it fits this problem]
**Problem it solves:** [one sentence]
**Paid offer it leads to:** [offer] — bridge: [why solving this creates demand for that]
**Ideal subscriber:** [who] · **Deliberately excludes:** [who it shouldn't attract]
## Contents outline
1. ...
2. ...
## Delivery
- Mechanism: [instant email / hosted page / tool link]
- Consumption time: [minutes]
## Validation record
1. One problem: PASS/FAIL — [note] 2. Ideal customer wants it: ... 3. Instant delivery: ...
4. Beats competing freebies: ... 5. Sells the next step: ...
## Handoffs
- Landing page → skills/marketing/direct-response-copy (pass this spec + positioning statement)
- Delivery & nurture emails → skills/marketing/email-sequences (pass the promise the emails must keep)
[Draft of the asset follows / is attached]
Quality bar (check before delivering)
- [ ] One problem, one audience — the "deliberately excludes" line is filled in and real.
- [ ] Consumable in one sitting (guide ≤ 20 pages; checklist/template in minutes).
- [ ] The bridge sentence to the paid offer is causal, not "and then buy our stuff".
- [ ] Title names a concrete outcome; no invented numbers or fake social proof anywhere.
- [ ] All five validation checks recorded PASS.
- [ ] Doesn't give away the paid offer's core deliverable.
Integration
- Upstream:
skills/marketing/positioning-anglessupplies the claim the magnet's slice derives from;skills/marketing/orchestratorroutes here on conversion paths;skills/marketing/keyword-researchcan suggest magnet topics from high-intent clusters. - Downstream:
skills/marketing/direct-response-copyconsumes the spec to write the opt-in page;skills/marketing/email-sequencesconsumes the promise + paid-offer bridge to build the welcome sequence. What crosses the boundary is this spec document.