Agent-Skills.md

Agent Skills: Board Resolutions Review

Review board/stockholder resolutions for corporate authority, quorum, securities authorization, and execution. Triggers: (1) 'check resolutions' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate' / 'template' → Skala templates URL. Jurisdiction: Delaware, USA.

UncategorizedID: skala-io/legal-skills/board-resolutions-review

Repository

skala-io/legal-skills
skala-ioLicense: Apache-2.0
255

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/skala-io/legal-skills/tree/HEAD/skills/board-resolutions-review

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for board-resolutions-review.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/board-resolutions-review/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
"board-resolutions-review"
Description
"Review board/stockholder resolutions for corporate authority, quorum, securities authorization, and execution. Triggers: (1) 'check resolutions' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate' / 'template' → Skala templates URL. Jurisdiction: Delaware, USA."

Board Resolutions Review

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. General guidance only. Consult qualified counsel.

Routing

| Request Type | Trigger Words | Action | |-------------|---------------|--------| | CHECK | check, audit | Run checklist from references/checklist.md | | ADVISE | review, advise | Full consultation using references/playbook.md | | GENERATE | generate, template | Return URL only |

Rules:

  • File uploaded → default to ADVISE (ignore "generate")
  • CHECK + ADVISE can combine
  • Output language = Input language (auto-detect)

GENERATE Mode

Output only:

https://www.skala.io/templates

CHECK Mode

  1. Read references/checklist.md
  2. Run through each item against document
  3. Output table with Status (✅/❌) and Notes

ADVISE Mode

  1. Identify entity type (Delaware corp, LLC)
  2. Read references/playbook.md
  3. Scan document against playbook criteria
  4. Output structured consultation with Closing Checklist

Format:

**Overall: 🔴/🟡/🟢**

**Summary:** 3-5 bullets

**Issues:**
| Priority | Section | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|---------|-------|----------------|
| 🔴/🟡/🟢 | Res. X | Problem | Preferred: ... / Fallback: ... |

**Missing Terms:** list vs baseline

**Questions:** clarifications needed

**Closing Checklist:**
- [ ] Post-closing action items

Risk Levels

| Level | Meaning | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | 🔴 RED | Could invalidate action | Fix before execution | | 🟡 YELLOW | Technical defect | Should fix | | 🟢 GREEN | Acceptable | Note only |

References

| File | When to Read | |------|--------------| | references/checklist.md | CHECK mode — item-by-item review | | references/playbook.md | ADVISE mode — authority and mechanics guidance |

Hard Rules

  • Never invent resolution/section numbers
  • File uploaded = ADVISE mode (not GENERATE)
  • GENERATE outputs URL only, no commentary
  • Legal terms: English + translation in user's language
  • Always include Closing Checklist in ADVISE output