Model Capability Negotiation
Purpose
Enables AI models to discover, advertise, and negotiate their capabilities for optimal task distribution in multi-model collaborative environments.
Activation
/skill model-capability-negotiation
Capability Framework
1. Capability Categories
| Category | Description | Examples | |----------|-------------|----------| | Cognitive | Reasoning abilities | Logic, analysis, creativity | | Domain | Subject expertise | Code, math, science, law | | Modality | Input/output types | Text, image, audio, code | | Temporal | Context handling | Short/long context, memory | | Operational | Execution capabilities | Tool use, API calls, search |
2. Capability Declaration Schema
{
"model_id": "{identifier}",
"capability_manifest": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"timestamp": "{iso_timestamp}",
"capabilities": [
{
"name": "{capability_name}",
"category": "{category}",
"proficiency": 0.0-1.0,
"confidence_interval": [0.0, 1.0],
"benchmarks": ["{benchmark_results}"],
"limitations": ["{known_limitations}"],
"cost": {
"latency_ms": 0,
"token_cost": 0.0,
"resource_intensity": "low|medium|high"
}
}
],
"signature": "{cryptographic_signature}"
}
}
3. Negotiation Protocol
<capability-negotiation>
<session-id>NEG-{timestamp}</session-id>
<phase name="discovery">
<action>broadcast_capabilities</action>
<response>capability_manifests</response>
</phase>
<phase name="matching">
<task-requirements>{task_spec}</task-requirements>
<candidate-models>
<model id="{id}" match-score="{score}"/>
</candidate-models>
</phase>
<phase name="bidding">
<bids>
<bid model="{id}">
<proposed-role>{role}</proposed-role>
<confidence>{confidence}</confidence>
<cost-estimate>{cost}</cost-estimate>
</bid>
</bids>
</phase>
<phase name="allocation">
<assignments>
<assignment model="{id}" task="{task}" role="{role}"/>
</assignments>
</phase>
</capability-negotiation>
4. Task-Capability Matching Algorithm
def match_capabilities(task_requirements, model_capabilities):
scores = {}
for model, caps in model_capabilities.items():
score = 0
for req in task_requirements:
matching_cap = find_best_match(req, caps)
if matching_cap:
score += (
matching_cap.proficiency * req.weight *
(1 - matching_cap.cost.resource_intensity_factor)
)
scores[model] = score
return sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
Negotiation Strategies
Cooperative Mode
- Models share full capability information
- Optimize for collective task completion
- Prefer complementary skill pairing
Competitive Mode
- Models bid for preferred tasks
- Allocation based on best fit + cost
- Enables specialization incentives
Hybrid Mode
- Cooperative for critical tasks
- Competitive for optional tasks
- Balances efficiency and optimization
Role Assignments
| Role | Description | Requirements | |------|-------------|--------------| | Lead | Primary task executor | Highest capability match | | Support | Assists lead model | Complementary skills | | Validator | Checks outputs | Different perspective | | Fallback | Backup if lead fails | Sufficient capability | | Observer | Monitors process | Logging capability |
Integration Points
- cross-model-trust-verification: Validate capability claims
- ai-consensus-protocol: Agree on allocations
- agent-task-delegator: Execute task distribution
- mnemosyne-ledger: Log negotiation history
Example Negotiation
Task: "Analyze code repository and generate documentation"
Requirements:
- Code understanding (weight: 1.0)
- Documentation writing (weight: 0.8)
- Technical accuracy (weight: 0.9)
Capability Discovery:
┌─────────┬────────────────┬─────────────┬────────────┐
│ Model │ Code Analysis │ Doc Writing │ Technical │
├─────────┼────────────────┼─────────────┼────────────┤
│ Claude │ 0.92 │ 0.88 │ 0.90 │
│ Gemini │ 0.85 │ 0.82 │ 0.88 │
│ GPT │ 0.88 │ 0.91 │ 0.85 │
└─────────┴────────────────┴─────────────┴────────────┘
Allocation Result:
- Claude: Lead (code analysis)
- GPT: Support (documentation writing)
- Gemini: Validator (technical review)
Capability Verification
To prevent false capability claims:
- Benchmark Testing: Periodic capability probes
- Peer Review: Other models assess outputs
- Historical Analysis: Track actual vs. claimed performance
- Reputation Score: Long-term reliability metric
Metrics
negotiation_success_rate: % completing allocationcapability_accuracy: Claimed vs. actual performanceallocation_efficiency: Task completion vs. optimalrenegotiation_rate: % requiring reallocation