Agent Skills: R&D Management Expert

R&D management expertise for R&D portfolio management, technology roadmapping, research methodology, patent strategy, lab management, academic partnerships, and regulatory pathways. Use when managing research programs, planning technology roadmaps, or building patent portfolios.

UncategorizedID: travisjneuman/.claude/rd-management

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude/tree/HEAD/skills/rd-management

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for rd-management.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/rd-management/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
rd-management
Description
R&D management expertise for R&D portfolio management, technology roadmapping, research methodology, patent strategy, lab management, academic partnerships, and regulatory pathways. Use when managing research programs, planning technology roadmaps, or building patent portfolios.

R&D Management Expert

Comprehensive R&D frameworks for research strategy, technology roadmapping, and innovation pipeline management.

R&D Strategy

R&D Portfolio Framework

PORTFOLIO DIMENSIONS:

BY TYPE:
- Basic Research (10-20%)
- Applied Research (20-30%)
- Development (50-70%)

BY TIME HORIZON:
- Near-term (<2 years)
- Mid-term (2-5 years)
- Long-term (>5 years)

BY RISK:
- Core (incremental)
- Adjacent (new territory)
- Breakthrough (transformational)

PORTFOLIO BALANCE:
Mature companies: More development, less research
Growth companies: More research, balanced development
Disruption risk: More breakthrough investment

R&D Investment Analysis

| Metric | Formula | Benchmark | | ------------------- | ------------------------------- | ----------------- | | R&D Intensity | R&D Spend / Revenue | Industry specific | | R&D Efficiency | New Product Revenue / R&D Spend | >2x | | Patent Yield | Patents / R&D Spend | Varies | | Time to Market | Concept to launch | Decreasing | | Project Success | Successful / Total projects | 20-40% |

R&D Operating Models

CENTRALIZED:
- Single R&D organization
- Economies of scale
- Technology leverage
- Long-term focus
Pros: Efficiency, coordination
Cons: Distant from business

DECENTRALIZED:
- Business unit R&D
- Close to market
- Faster response
- Application focus
Pros: Relevance, speed
Cons: Duplication, short-term

HYBRID:
- Central research labs
- BU development teams
- Shared services
- Technology transfer
Pros: Balance
Cons: Coordination complexity

Technology Roadmapping

Roadmap Structure

TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP LAYERS:

MARKET LAYER:
- Customer needs
- Market trends
- Competitive dynamics
- Regulatory changes

PRODUCT LAYER:
- Product generations
- Feature evolution
- Platform decisions
- Release timing

TECHNOLOGY LAYER:
- Core technologies
- Enabling technologies
- Emerging technologies
- Technology dependencies

RESOURCE LAYER:
- Capabilities needed
- Skill development
- Partnerships
- Infrastructure

Roadmapping Process

| Phase | Activities | Output | | ----------------- | -------------------------- | ---------------- | | Planning | Scope, team, timeline | Charter | | Analysis | Market, technology, gap | Insights | | Synthesis | Prioritization, sequencing | Draft roadmap | | Validation | Stakeholder review | Refined roadmap | | Communication | Publication, training | Deployed roadmap | | Maintenance | Updates, governance | Living document |

Technology Maturity

TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVELS (TRL):

TRL 1: Basic principles observed
TRL 2: Technology concept formulated
TRL 3: Experimental proof of concept
TRL 4: Technology validated in lab
TRL 5: Technology validated in relevant environment
TRL 6: Technology demonstrated in relevant environment
TRL 7: System prototype demonstrated in operational environment
TRL 8: System complete and qualified
TRL 9: Actual system proven in operational environment

INVESTMENT BY TRL:
TRL 1-3: Research funding
TRL 4-6: Development funding
TRL 7-9: Engineering/Launch funding

Research Management

Research Project Types

| Type | Goal | Duration | Risk | | --------------- | --------------------- | ----------- | --------- | | Basic | New knowledge | 3-10+ years | Very High | | Applied | Specific applications | 2-5 years | High | | Development | Productization | 1-3 years | Medium | | Engineering | Commercialization | 6-18 months | Lower |

For detailed research methodology, lab management, product development frameworks, and engineering standards, see Research Frameworks Reference.

Academic Partnerships

Partnership Models

| Model | Investment | IP Rights | Engagement | | ---------------------- | ---------- | --------------- | ------------- | | Sponsored Research | Funding | Negotiated | Project-based | | Consortium | Shared | Pre-competitive | Multi-party | | Licensing | Royalties | Licensed | Transaction | | Joint Venture | Equity | Shared | Deep | | Chair/Fellowship | Endowment | None | Talent access |

University Collaboration

COLLABORATION FRAMEWORK:

RELATIONSHIP BUILDING:
- Faculty engagement
- Student recruiting
- Advisory boards
- Speaking engagements

PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
- Clear objectives
- Milestone tracking
- Regular communication
- IP agreements upfront

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
- Licensing evaluation
- Patent prosecution
- Startup spin-offs
- Joint development

SUCCESS METRICS:
- Publications
- Patents
- Technologies adopted
- Hires from program

For detailed regulatory pathways and clinical development phases, see Regulatory & Clinical Development Reference.

R&D Metrics & Governance

R&D KPIs

| Category | Metric | Benchmark | | -------------- | ------------------ | ------------ | | Input | R&D spend | % of revenue | | Process | Project milestones | On-time % | | Output | Products launched | Per year | | Efficiency | Cost per project | Improving | | Quality | First-time success | >30% | | Speed | Cycle time | Decreasing |

R&D Governance

GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE:

PORTFOLIO REVIEW BOARD:
- Investment allocation
- Project prioritization
- Resource decisions
- Go/No-go decisions

PROJECT GOVERNANCE:
- Stage gate reviews
- Technical reviews
- Business case updates
- Risk management

TECHNICAL GOVERNANCE:
- Architecture decisions
- Technology standards
- Platform decisions
- Make/buy/partner

MEETING CADENCE:
| Forum | Frequency | Participants |
|-------|-----------|--------------|
| Portfolio Review | Quarterly | Executives |
| Project Review | Monthly | Project sponsors |
| Technical Review | As needed | Technical leaders |
| Team Standups | Weekly/Daily | Project teams |

R&D Talent

Technical Career Path

DUAL LADDER SYSTEM:

TECHNICAL TRACK:
- Associate Engineer
- Engineer
- Senior Engineer
- Principal Engineer
- Fellow
- Distinguished Fellow

MANAGEMENT TRACK:
- Team Lead
- Manager
- Director
- VP Engineering
- SVP/CTO

EQUIVALENCIES:
Principal Engineer ≈ Director
Fellow ≈ VP
Distinguished Fellow ≈ SVP

CAREER DEVELOPMENT:
- Technical certifications
- Publication requirements
- Patent expectations
- Leadership development

Technical Community

COMMUNITY BUILDING:

KNOWLEDGE SHARING:
- Technical forums
- Lunch & learns
- Internal conferences
- Best practice sharing

DEVELOPMENT:
- Training programs
- Mentoring
- Rotation programs
- External conferences

RECOGNITION:
- Technical awards
- Patent recognition
- Publication support
- Innovation prizes

References

See Also