Agent Skills: Spec-Driven Development: Planning Skill

Plan-first development methodology that creates detailed specifications before coding. Creates structured plans with phases, file-level details, and verification steps. Includes automatic AI review, modification application, and validation.

UncategorizedID: tylerburleigh/claude-foundry/sdd-plan

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for sdd-plan.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/sdd-plan/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
sdd-plan
Description
Plan-first development methodology that creates detailed specifications before coding. Creates structured plans with phases, file-level details, and verification steps. Includes automatic AI review, modification application, and validation.

Spec-Driven Development: Planning Skill

Overview

Skill(foundry:sdd-plan) creates detailed JSON specifications before any code is written. It analyzes the codebase, designs a phased implementation approach, produces structured task hierarchies, and runs automatic quality checks including AI review.

Core capabilities:

  • Analyze codebase structure using Explore agents and LSP
  • Design phased implementation approaches
  • Create JSON specifications with task hierarchies
  • Define verification steps for each phase
  • Automatic AI review of specifications
  • Apply review feedback as modifications
  • Validate and auto-fix specifications

Integrated Workflow

This skill combines planning, review, modification, and validation into a unified flow:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. Analyze     2. Create Spec    3. AI Review    4. Apply     5. Validate  │
│  ───────────    ────────────      ───────────     ──────────   ──────────   │
│  Explore/LSP →  spec-create   →   spec-review →  apply-plan → validate-fix │
│  (understand)   (scaffold)        (auto)         (if needed)  (auto-fix)   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Flow

[x?]=decision · (GATE)=user approval · =sequence · =loop

- **Entry** → UnderstandIntent → Analyze[Explore|LSP]
  - `authoring action="spec-create"` → scaffold spec
  - `authoring action="phase-add-bulk"` ↻ per phase
  - `authoring action="spec-update-frontmatter"` → mission/metadata
- **Review** → `review action="spec-review"` (automatic)
  - [findings?] → `review action="parse-feedback"`
  - (GATE: approve modifications) → `spec action="apply-plan"`
- **Validate** → `spec action="validate"` ↻ [errors?] → `spec action="fix"`
- **Exit** → specs/pending/{spec-id}.json

When to Use This Skill

Use for:

  • New features or significant functionality additions
  • Complex refactoring across multiple files
  • API integrations or external service connections
  • Architecture changes or system redesigns
  • Any task requiring precision and reliability

Do NOT use for:

  • Simple one-file changes or bug fixes
  • Trivial modifications or formatting changes
  • Exploratory prototyping or spikes
  • Finding next task or tracking progress (use sdd-implement)

MCP Tooling

| Router | Key Actions | |--------|-------------| | authoring | spec-create, spec-update-frontmatter, phase-add-bulk, phase-template, phase-move, phase-update-metadata, assumption-add, assumption-list | | spec | validate, fix, apply-plan, completeness-check, duplicate-detection, stats, analyze-deps | | review | spec-review, parse-feedback, list-tools | | task | add, remove, move, update-metadata |

Critical Rule: NEVER read spec JSON files directly with Read() or shell commands.

Core Workflow

Step 1: Understand Intent

Before creating any plan:

  • Core objective: What is the primary goal?
  • Spec mission: Single-sentence mission for metadata.mission
  • Success criteria: What defines "done"?
  • Constraints: What limitations or requirements exist?

Step 2: Analyze Codebase

Use Explore subagents for large codebases (prevents context bloat), or Glob/Grep/Read for targeted lookups.

LSP-Enhanced Analysis for refactoring:

  • documentSymbol - Understand file structure
  • findReferences - Assess impact (count affected files)
  • goToDefinition - Navigate to implementations

See references/codebase-analysis.md for detailed patterns.

Step 3: Create Phase Plan

For complex features, create a markdown phase plan first:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__plan action="create" name="Feature Name" template="detailed"

Get user approval before detailed spec creation.

See references/phase-authoring.md for templates and bulk macros.

Step 4: Create JSON Specification

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="spec-create" name="feature-name" template="empty"

Add phases with tasks:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="phase-add-bulk" spec_id="{spec-id}" phase='{"title": "Implementation", "description": "Core work"}' tasks='[{"type": "task", "title": "Build core logic", "task_category": "implementation", "file_path": "src/core.py", "acceptance_criteria": ["Workflow works"]}]'

Update metadata:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="spec-update-frontmatter" spec_id="{spec-id}" key="mission" value="Single-sentence objective"

Add assumptions:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="assumption-add" spec_id="{spec-id}" text="Single GCP project for staging and production"
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="assumption-add" spec_id="{spec-id}" text="Shared Redis with key prefix isolation" assumption_type="constraint"

List assumptions:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="assumption-list" spec_id="{spec-id}"

See references/json-spec.md and references/task-hierarchy.md for structure details.

Step 5: Run AI Review (Automatic)

After spec creation, AI review runs automatically:

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__review action="spec-review" spec_id="{spec-id}" review_type="full"

Review types: | Type | Models | Focus | Use When | |------|--------|-------|----------| | quick | 2 | Completeness, Clarity | Simple specs | | full | 3-4 | All 6 dimensions | Complex specs | | security | 2-3 | Risk Management | Auth, data handling | | feasibility | 2-3 | Estimates, Dependencies | Tight deadlines |

See references/plan-review-workflow.md for detailed review workflow. See references/plan-review-dimensions.md for review dimensions. See references/plan-review-consensus.md for interpreting results.

Step 6: Apply Modifications (If Needed)

If review finds issues, parse and apply feedback:

# Parse review feedback into modifications
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__review action="parse-feedback" spec_id="{spec-id}" review_path="path/to/review.md"

# Preview changes (always preview first!)
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__spec action="apply-plan" spec_id="{spec-id}" modifications_file="suggestions.json" dry_run=true

# Apply changes (backup created automatically)
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__spec action="apply-plan" spec_id="{spec-id}" modifications_file="suggestions.json"

See references/modification-workflow.md for detailed workflow. See references/modification-operations.md for operation formats.

Step 7: Validate Specification

Validate and auto-fix the specification:

# Validate
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__spec action="validate" spec_id="{spec-id}"

# Auto-fix common issues
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__spec action="fix" spec_id="{spec-id}"

# Re-validate until clean
mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__spec action="validate" spec_id="{spec-id}"

Exit codes:

  • 0: Valid (no errors)
  • 1: Warnings only
  • 2: Errors (run fix)
  • 3: File error

See references/validation-workflow.md for detailed workflow. See references/validation-fixes.md for fix patterns. See references/validation-issues.md for issue types.

Phase-First Authoring

Use this approach for efficient spec creation:

Step 1: Create spec from template

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="spec-create" name="my-feature" template="empty"

Step 2: Add phases with bulk macro

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="phase-add-bulk" spec_id="{spec-id}" phase='{"title": "Phase 1"}' tasks='[...]'

Step 3: Fine-tune tasks Use modification operations to adjust individual tasks.

Step 4: Update frontmatter

mcp__plugin_foundry_foundry-mcp__authoring action="spec-update-frontmatter" spec_id="{spec-id}" key="mission" value="..."

File Path Policy

For implementation or refactoring tasks, set metadata.file_path to a real repo-relative path. Do not guess or use placeholders. If unclear, use task_category: "investigation" first.

Valid Values Reference

Spec Templates

| Template | Use Case | Required Fields | |----------|----------|-----------------| | simple | Small tasks | Basic fields only | | medium | Standard features | mission, description, acceptance_criteria, task_category | | complex | Large features | All medium + detailed metadata | | security | Security-sensitive | All complex + security review |

Task Categories

| Category | Requires file_path | |----------|---------------------| | investigation | No | | implementation | Yes | | refactoring | Yes | | decision | No | | research | No |

Node Types

| Node Type | type Value | Key Fields | |-----------|--------------|------------| | Task | "task" | task_category, file_path | | Research | "research" | research_type, blocking_mode, query | | Verification | "verify" | verification_type |

See references/task-hierarchy.md for research node patterns and blocking modes.

Verification Types

| Type | Purpose | |------|---------| | run-tests | Execute test suite | | fidelity | Compare implementation to spec | | manual | Manual testing checklist |

Task Statuses

| Status | Description | |--------|-------------| | pending | Not yet started | | in_progress | Currently being worked on | | completed | Finished successfully | | blocked | Cannot proceed |

Size Guidelines

If >6 phases or >50 tasks, recommend splitting into multiple specs.

Output Artifacts

  1. JSON spec file at specs/pending/{spec-id}.json
  2. AI review report at specs/.plan-reviews/{spec-id}-review-{type}.md
  3. Validation passed with no errors

Detailed Reference

Planning:

  • Investigation strategies → references/investigation.md
  • Phase authoring → references/phase-authoring.md
  • Phase plan template → references/phase-plan-template.md
  • JSON spec structure → references/json-spec.md
  • Task hierarchy → references/task-hierarchy.md
  • Codebase analysis → references/codebase-analysis.md

Review:

  • Review workflow → references/plan-review-workflow.md
  • Review dimensions → references/plan-review-dimensions.md
  • Consensus interpretation → references/plan-review-consensus.md

Modification:

  • Modification workflow → references/modification-workflow.md
  • Operation formats → references/modification-operations.md

Validation:

  • Validation workflow → references/validation-workflow.md
  • Fix patterns → references/validation-fixes.md
  • Issue types → references/validation-issues.md

General:

  • AI review → references/ai-review.md
  • Troubleshooting → references/troubleshooting.md