Agent Skills: Source-Driven Development

Ground every framework decision in official documentation. Use when you want authoritative, source-cited code for any framework or library.

model-invokedID: v1truv1us/ai-eng-system/source-driven-development

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/v1truv1us/ai-eng-system/tree/HEAD/skills/source-driven-development

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for source-driven-development.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/source-driven-development/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
source-driven-development
Description
Ground every framework decision in official documentation. Use when you want authoritative, source-cited code for any framework or library.

Default output: return only the result, blockers, and required evidence. Omit preambles, process narration, repeated context, confidence scores, and follow-up offers. Use at most five bullets unless a required artifact or schema needs more.

Source-Driven Development

Overview

Verify every framework or library decision against official documentation before implementing. Flag any decision that lacks a source. This skill prevents the agent from relying on outdated patterns, hallucinated APIs, or assumptions about library behavior.

When to Use

  • Working with a framework or library you have not used recently
  • When API surface area is large or frequently changing
  • When the cost of a wrong assumption is high (auth, data, security)
  • When documentation lookup tools are available

Process

Step 1: Identify Framework Decisions

Before writing code that depends on a library:

  • List every API call, configuration option, or pattern you plan to use
  • Note which ones you are confident about and which are assumptions

Step 2: Verify Against Official Sources

For each decision:

  • Look up the current documentation
  • Confirm the API exists and behaves as expected
  • Note the version the docs target
  • If you cannot find a source, flag it explicitly

Step 3: Cite Sources

In comments or design docs:

  • Reference the official doc URL or section
  • Note the library version
  • Flag anything that could not be verified

Step 4: Flag Unverified Decisions

Explicitly mark decisions that lack source confirmation:

  • // UNVERIFIED: assuming X based on Y pattern
  • These flags must be resolved before production use

Source Quality Hierarchy

  1. Official documentation (highest)
  2. Official examples and repositories
  3. Well-maintained community guides with dates
  4. Stack Overflow with accepted answers and recent dates
  5. AI-generated suggestions (lowest, must be verified)

Common Rationalizations

| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "I know this library well enough" | Libraries change between versions. Confidence is not accuracy. | | "Looking up docs slows me down" | Debugging a wrong assumption is slower than verifying upfront. | | "The AI already knows the right API" | AI training data has a cutoff date. APIs change. |

Verification

  • [ ] Every framework API call is verified against current docs
  • [ ] Unverified decisions are explicitly flagged
  • [ ] Library versions are documented
  • [ ] No code depends on hallucinated or outdated API behavior

Anti-Rationalization Table

| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "I know this library well enough" | Libraries change between versions. Confidence is not accuracy. | | "Looking up docs slows me down" | Debugging a wrong assumption is slower than verifying upfront. | | "The AI already knows the right API" | AI training data has a cutoff date. APIs change. Verify against current docs. | | "I'll verify after the implementation works" | If the API does not exist, the implementation will not work. Verify first. | | "Stack Overflow has the answer" | Stack Overflow answers may be outdated. Official docs are the source of truth. |