Agent Skills: Skill: Iterator

Skill: Iterator

Intent

Provide a traversal interface that lets clients move through elements without depending on concrete container internals. This preserves encapsulation while supporting multiple traversal strategies.

Applicability Signals

• Signal 1: Clients currently depend on collection internals (indexes, node pointers, custom storage details).
• Signal 2: Multiple traversal orders are needed (forward, reverse, filtered, paged).
• Signal 3: Aggregate representation may change, but traversal consumers should remain stable.

Contraindications

• Case 1: Language-native iteration already fully solves traversal and abstraction needs.
• Case 2: Collection size is tiny and direct access is simpler and clearer.
• Case 3: Traversal must be purely set-based at database/query layer, not in-memory object navigation.

Decision Heuristics

• If traversal behavior varies while container abstraction should stay hidden, prefer Iterator.
• If only one simple pass exists and representation is already stable API, keep direct iteration.
• Decision anti-bias note: avoid custom iterators that duplicate built-in iterable protocols without added value.

Implementation Checklist

• [ ] Define iterator contract (hasNext/next or language-native protocol equivalent).
• [ ] Define aggregate contract returning iterator instances.
• [ ] Implement concrete iterators for required traversal modes.
• [ ] Ensure iterator state is isolated per traversal instance.
• [ ] Add tests for full traversal, boundaries, and empty collections.

Misuse Checks

• Misuse 1: Iterator leaks underlying node/index details → Remediation: return domain elements only.
• Misuse 2: Shared mutable cursor across consumers causes race bugs → Remediation: per-consumer iterator instances.
• Misuse 3: Complex filtering pushed into iterator when query layer should handle it → Remediation: split query concerns from iteration concerns.

Verification Rubric

• Correctness:
  • [ ] Iterator yields expected element sequence for baseline traversal.
  • [ ] Boundary behavior is correct (empty, last element, exhaustion).
• Design quality:
  • [ ] Aggregate internals are not exposed to consumers.
  • [ ] Alternate traversal strategies are addable without changing clients.
• Regression safety:
  • [ ] Tests cover at least one additional traversal mode (e.g., reverse/filter).

Language-Specific Adaptations (Optional)

• TypeScript: implement Iterable<T> / generator-based iterators for idiomatic for...of usage.
• Python: leverage __iter__ and generators while preserving domain-level abstraction boundaries.
• Go: emulate iterators with channel/function cursor patterns where standard loops are insufficient.

Related Patterns (Optional)

• Composite: iterators often traverse recursive composite structures.
• Visitor: visitor operations can run over iterator-provided traversal order.

Attribution & Sources

• Source Site: Refactoring.Guru
• Source URLs:
  • https://refactoring.guru/design-patterns/iterator
  • https://refactoring.guru/design-patterns
• Derivation Note: Concepts derived from referenced sources; explanatory wording rewritten for this repository.
• Policy Note: This artifact intentionally includes no direct quotes and no Refactoring.Guru images.