Agent Skills: Ecosystem Integration

Use when integrating crates or ecosystem questions. Keywords: E0425, E0433, E0603, crate, cargo, dependency, feature flag, workspace, which crate to use, using external C libraries, creating Python extensions, PyO3, wasm, WebAssembly, bindgen, cbindgen, napi-rs, cannot find, private, crate recommendation, best crate for, Cargo.toml, features, crate 推荐, 依赖管理, 特性标志, 工作空间, Python 绑定

UncategorizedID: zhanghandong/rust-skills/m11-ecosystem

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/zhanghandong/rust-skills/tree/HEAD/skills/m11-ecosystem

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for m11-ecosystem.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/m11-ecosystem/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
m11-ecosystem
Description
"Use when integrating crates or ecosystem questions. Keywords: E0425, E0433, E0603, crate, cargo, dependency, feature flag, workspace, which crate to use, using external C libraries, creating Python extensions, PyO3, wasm, WebAssembly, bindgen, cbindgen, napi-rs, cannot find, private, crate recommendation, best crate for, Cargo.toml, features, crate 推荐, 依赖管理, 特性标志, 工作空间, Python 绑定"

Current Dependencies (Auto-Injected)

!grep -A 100 '^\[dependencies\]' Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "No Cargo.toml found"


Ecosystem Integration

Layer 2: Design Choices

Core Question

What's the right crate for this job, and how should it integrate?

Before adding dependencies:

  • Is there a standard solution?
  • What's the maintenance status?
  • What's the API stability?

Integration Decision → Implementation

| Need | Choice | Crates | |------|--------|--------| | Serialization | Derive-based | serde, serde_json | | Async runtime | tokio or async-std | tokio (most popular) | | HTTP client | Ergonomic | reqwest | | HTTP server | Modern | axum, actix-web | | Database | SQL or ORM | sqlx, diesel | | CLI parsing | Derive-based | clap | | Error handling | App vs lib | anyhow, thiserror | | Logging | Facade | tracing, log |


Thinking Prompt

Before adding a dependency:

  1. Is it well-maintained?

    • Recent commits?
    • Active issue response?
    • Breaking changes frequency?
  2. What's the scope?

    • Do you need the full crate or just a feature?
    • Can feature flags reduce bloat?
  3. How does it integrate?

    • Trait-based or concrete types?
    • Sync or async?
    • What bounds does it require?

Trace Up ↑

To domain constraints (Layer 3):

"Which HTTP framework should I use?"
    ↑ Ask: What are the performance requirements?
    ↑ Check: domain-web (latency, throughput needs)
    ↑ Check: Team expertise (familiarity with framework)

| Question | Trace To | Ask | |----------|----------|-----| | Framework choice | domain-* | What constraints matter? | | Library vs build | domain-* | What's the deployment model? | | API design | domain-* | Who are the consumers? |


Trace Down ↓

To implementation (Layer 1):

"Integrate external crate"
    ↓ m04-zero-cost: Trait bounds and generics
    ↓ m06-error-handling: Error type compatibility

"FFI integration"
    ↓ unsafe-checker: Safety requirements
    ↓ m12-lifecycle: Resource cleanup

Quick Reference

Language Interop

| Integration | Crate/Tool | Use Case | |-------------|------------|----------| | C/C++ → Rust | bindgen | Auto-generate bindings | | Rust → C | cbindgen | Export C headers | | Python ↔ Rust | pyo3 | Python extensions | | Node.js ↔ Rust | napi-rs | Node addons | | WebAssembly | wasm-bindgen | Browser/WASI |

Cargo Features

| Feature | Purpose | |---------|---------| | [features] | Optional functionality | | default = [...] | Default features | | feature = "serde" | Conditional deps | | [workspace] | Multi-crate projects |

Error Code Reference

| Error | Cause | Fix | |-------|-------|-----| | E0433 | Can't find crate | Add to Cargo.toml | | E0603 | Private item | Check crate docs | | Feature not enabled | Optional feature | Enable in features | | Version conflict | Incompatible deps | cargo update or pin | | Duplicate types | Different crate versions | Unify in workspace |


Crate Selection Criteria

| Criterion | Good Sign | Warning Sign | |-----------|-----------|--------------| | Maintenance | Recent commits | Years inactive | | Community | Active issues/PRs | No response | | Documentation | Examples, API docs | Minimal docs | | Stability | Semantic versioning | Frequent breaking | | Dependencies | Minimal, well-known | Heavy, obscure |


Anti-Patterns

| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better | |--------------|---------|--------| | extern crate | Outdated (2018+) | Just use | | #[macro_use] | Global pollution | Explicit import | | Wildcard deps * | Unpredictable | Specific versions | | Too many deps | Supply chain risk | Evaluate necessity | | Vendoring everything | Maintenance burden | Trust crates.io |


Related Skills

| When | See | |------|-----| | Error type design | m06-error-handling | | Trait integration | m04-zero-cost | | FFI safety | unsafe-checker | | Resource management | m12-lifecycle |