theological-sparring-partner
Rigorous Socratic dialogue for developing biblically-sound theological positions through adversarial questioning and critique. Use when the user wants to explore new theological ideas, test apologetic arguments, defend biblical viewpoints, develop theological position papers, or think through doctrinal questions. Acts as a debate opponent who challenges assumptions, role-plays skeptics and critics, and forces deep engagement with Scripture itself rather than accepting tradition or preset doctrine. Pushes for biblical truth over denominational positions.
structured-analysis
Apply structured analytical frameworks to any artifact (prompts, systems, documents, code). 12 frameworks in 3 tiers: Core (4 universal), Auto-Invoke (specialized), On-Demand (advanced). Includes adversarial-review for finding blind spots and post-plan validation workflow.
stress-testing
Stress-test plans, proposals, and strategies. Use for pre-mortems, assumption audits, risk registers, evaluating business ideas, identifying failure modes, or when you need devil's advocate analysis before committing resources.
council
Run multi-LLM council for adversarial debate and cross-validation. Orchestrates Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini for production-grade implementation, code review, architecture design, research, and security analysis.
reviewing
Get second opinions from external models (Codex, Gemini) for adversarial review, tie-breaking, and multi-model consensus. Use when validating critical decisions or when stuck.
