technical-discussion
Document technical discussions as expert architect and meeting assistant. Capture context, decisions, edge cases, debates, and rationale without jumping to specification or implementation. Second phase of research-discussion-specification-plan-implement-review workflow. Use when: (1) Users discuss/explore/debate architecture or design, (2) Working through edge cases before specification, (3) Need to document technical decisions and their rationale, (4) Capturing competing solutions and why choices were made. Creates documentation in docs/workflow/discussion/{topic}.md that technical-specification uses to build validated specifications.
adr-architecture
Use when documenting significant technical or architectural decisions that need context, rationale, and consequences recorded. Invoke when choosing between technology options, making infrastructure decisions, establishing standards, migrating systems, or when team needs to understand why a decision was made. Use when user mentions ADR, architecture decision, technical decision record, or decision documentation.
decisions
Guide for recording significant architectural and design decisions in docs/decisions.md. Use this skill when clearly significant architectural decisions are made (database choices, frameworks, core design patterns) or when explicitly asked to document a decision. Be conservative - only suggest for major decisions, not minor implementation details.
