git-workflows
Advanced Git workflows including interactive rebase, bisect, worktrees, branch strategies, conflict resolution, cherry-picking, and submodules. Use when doing complex git operations, cleaning up commit history, managing multiple branches, investigating bugs with git bisect, or working on parallel features with worktrees.
anti-conflict
Prevent file conflicts between multiple AI agents working in parallel
conflict-resolution
Use when encountering merge conflicts - handle conflicts cleanly, verify resolution, and maintain code integrity
merge-conflict-resolution
Use when git merge or rebase fails with conflicts, you see 'unmerged paths' or conflict markers (<<<<<<< =======), or need help resolving conflicted files
git-hex-conflict-resolution
>
value-pluralism-resolver
Resolve conflicts between competing values through structured pluralistic analysis.
git-workflow
Activates when user needs help with git operations including branching, rebasing, merging, cherry-picking, stashing, and resolving conflicts. Triggers on "help me rebase", "fix merge conflict", "create branch", "git history", "undo commit", "squash commits", or any git workflow questions.
facilitation-patterns
Use when running meetings, workshops, brainstorms, design sprints, retrospectives, or team decision-making sessions. Apply when need structured group discussion, managing diverse stakeholder input, ensuring equal participation, handling conflict or groupthink, or when user mentions facilitation, workshop design, meeting patterns, session planning, or running effective collaborative sessions.
negotiation-alignment-governance
Use when stakeholders need aligned working agreements, resolving decision authority ambiguity, navigating cross-functional conflicts, establishing governance frameworks (RACI/DACI/RAPID), negotiating resource allocation, defining escalation paths, creating team norms, mediating trade-off disputes, or when user mentions stakeholder alignment, decision rights, working agreements, conflict resolution, governance model, or consensus building.
role-switch
Use when stakeholders have conflicting priorities and need alignment, suspect decision blind spots from single perspective, need to pressure-test proposals before presenting, want empathy for different viewpoints (eng vs PM vs legal vs user), building consensus across functions, evaluating tradeoffs with multi-dimensional impact, or when user mentions "what would X think", "stakeholder alignment", "see from their perspective", "blind spots", or "conflicting interests".
dialectical-mapping-steelmanning
Use when debates are trapped in false dichotomies, polarized positions need charitable interpretation, tradeoffs are obscured by binary framing, synthesis beyond 'pick one side' is needed, or when users mention steelman arguments, thesis-antithesis-synthesis, Hegelian dialectic, third way solutions, or resolving seemingly opposed principles.
chain-roleplay-debate-synthesis
Use when facing decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions. Invoke when stakeholders have competing priorities (growth vs. sustainability, speed vs. quality, innovation vs. risk), need to pressure-test ideas from different angles before committing, exploring tradeoffs between incompatible values, synthesizing conflicting expert opinions into coherent strategy, or surfacing assumptions that single-viewpoint analysis would miss.