scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.
paper-validator
This skill should be used when conducting comprehensive reviews of research papers for top-tier computer science conferences. Use for identifying weaknesses, unclear statements, missing evidence, and structural issues in academic papers. The skill autonomously reads files, searches for patterns, analyzes structure, and provides constructive peer-reviewer feedback.
domain-research-health-science
Use when formulating clinical research questions (PICOT framework), evaluating health evidence quality (study design hierarchy, bias assessment, GRADE), prioritizing patient-important outcomes, conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, creating evidence summaries for guidelines, assessing regulatory evidence, or when user mentions clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, health research methodology, systematic reviews, research protocols, or study quality assessment.
research-claim-map
Use when verifying claims before decisions, fact-checking statements against sources, conducting due diligence on vendor/competitor assertions, evaluating conflicting evidence, triangulating source credibility, assessing research validity for literature reviews, investigating misinformation, rating evidence strength (primary vs secondary), identifying knowledge gaps, or when user mentions "fact-check", "verify this", "is this true", "evaluate sources", "conflicting evidence", or "due diligence".
info-search-knowledge
针对新产品、新技术进行多渠道信息搜索和验证，并将可靠信息保存到知识库。优先选择权威科技媒体，忽略过时信息源。当用户提到"最新信息"、"新产品"、"新技术"、"搜索资料"、"查资料"、"了解XX"时使用此技能。
technical-writing
Write clear technical prose. Multi-layer review ensures structure, clarity, and evidence quality.
Confidence Honesty
Force honest confidence assessment before claiming conclusions. Triggers on 'root cause identified', 'problem identified', 'complete clarity'. Express confidence as percentage, explain what's stopping 100%, validate assumptions before presenting.
fact-checker
Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.
