review-spec
Review specifications for soundness, completeness, and implementability - validates structure, identifies ambiguities, checks for gaps before implementation
feature-orchestrator
Research-backed feature implementation workflow enforcing gap analysis, incremental planning, agent coordination, and continuous integration best practices. Auto-invoked for ALL feature implementation requests to prevent code duplication and ensure CLAUDE.md compliance.
validating-roadmap
Validates specification consistency, identifies implementation gaps, reviews roadmap coherence. Ensures documentation aligns, tasks are realistic, and dependencies are clear.
refining-specifications
Reviews existing specifications for ambiguity and missing decision points - uses structured taxonomy to detect gaps, generates prioritized clarification questions, reduces specification uncertainty.
gap-analysis
Route-aware gap analysis. For Brownfield - uses /speckit.analyze to compare specs against implementation. For Greenfield - validates spec completeness and asks about target tech stack for new implementation. This is Step 4 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
research-opportunity-investigator
Conduct systematic research and opportunity investigation for ACP protocol integration, collaboration, and enhancement opportunities. Use when the user wants to research external projects, protocols, or tools for potential collaboration; investigate gap-filling opportunities for IDE integrations; assess compatibility between ACP and external protocols; or identify opportunities for ACP adoption. Guides through discovery, analysis, validation, and RFC generation with mandatory gates and source grounding. Outputs include comprehensive summary documents, gap analyses, and formal RFC proposals.
gap-reconnaissance
Systematically identify capability gaps, research solutions, and outline integration guidance.
