skill-review
|
academic-writing
Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, or preparing for peer review. Essential for researchers, graduate students, and academics across disciplines.
multi-model-research
Orchestrate multiple frontier LLMs (Claude, GPT-5.1, Gemini 3.0 Pro, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1) for comprehensive research using LLM Council pattern with peer review and synthesis
paper-validator
This skill should be used when conducting comprehensive reviews of research papers for top-tier computer science conferences. Use for identifying weaknesses, unclear statements, missing evidence, and structural issues in academic papers. The skill autonomously reads files, searches for patterns, analyzes structure, and provides constructive peer-reviewer feedback.
evaluate
This skill should be used when evaluating the logical flow, structure, readability, and overall quality of research paper text. Use for assessing academic writing targeting top-tier computer science conferences.
scientific-manuscript-review
Use when reviewing or editing research manuscripts, journal articles, reviews, or perspectives. Invoke when user mentions manuscript, paper draft, article, research writing, journal submission, reviewer feedback, or needs to improve scientific writing clarity, structure, or argumentation in their manuscript.
scholar-evaluation
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.