contract-analyzer
Review contracts for concerning clauses, extract key terms, compare to standard terms, and flag unusual provisions. Use when user needs contract review, legal document analysis, or agreement evaluation.
anti-ai-slop
After working on the code, ensure the branch contains only the minimal, idiomatic changes by removing AI-generated slop introduced on this branch.
github-pr-review
Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, or verify PR readiness. Fetches comments via GitHub CLI, classifies by severity, applies fixes with user confirmation, commits with proper format, replies to threads.
codex-code-review
Perform comprehensive code reviews using OpenAI Codex CLI. This skill should be used when users request code reviews, want to analyze diffs/PRs, need security audits, performance analysis, or want automated code quality feedback. Supports reviewing staged changes, specific files, entire directories, or git diffs.
code-review-helper
Systematic code review workflows with bundled utilities for analyzing code quality, detecting patterns, and providing structured feedback. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests or conducting code audits.
Python Type Hint Reviewer
Reviews code diffs (uncommited changes written by the agent) or new files(untracked files) for Python type hinting and structural principle compliance. Use this skill when user say review code diffs or new files or want to check code quality(when file is a python file). Requires explicit user confirmation before applying any modifications to ensure code quality and safety.
code-reviewer
Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, or identifying security vulnerabilities. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions. Keywords: code review, PR review, quality, refactoring, best practices.
pr-template-generator
Generate comprehensive pull request descriptions that help reviewers understand changes quickly a...
code-reviewer
Automated code review with best practices, security checks, and quality standards.
mvp-validator
Review startup MVPs for realism, agility, and business viability. This skill conducts critical but objective analysis of MVP ideas, requirements, and implementation plans, identifying strengths and pain points to provide constructive feedback. Trigger when users request MVP reviews, feasibility checks, or startup idea validation.
ln-402-task-reviewer
Reviews completed tasks (To Review) and moves them to Done or To Rework. Zero tolerance: all issues fixed now.
ln-610-code-comments-auditor
Audit code comments and docstrings quality across 6 categories (WHY-not-WHAT, Density, Forbidden Content, Docstrings, Actuality, Legacy). Use when code needs comment review, after major refactoring, or as part of ln-100-documents-pipeline. Outputs Compliance Score X/10 per category + Findings + Recommended Actions.
review-implementation
Use after hyperpowers:executing-plans completes all tasks - verifies implementation against bd spec, all success criteria met, anti-patterns avoided
comment-mode
Granular feedback on drafts without rewriting. Generates highlighted HTML with click-to-reveal inline comments. Use when user says "comment on this", "leave comments on", "give feedback on", or asks for feedback on a draft. Supports multiple lenses—editor feedback, POV simulation ("as brian would react"), or focused angles ("word choice only", "weak arguments"). A granular alternative to rewrites that lets users review feedback incrementally without losing their voice.
ai-proofreading
系统化降低AI检测率至30%以下，通过三遍审校流程（内容、风格、细节）增加人味。当用户提到"AI味太重"、"像AI写的"、"降低AI检测率"、"更像人写的"、"自然一些"、"口语化"时使用此技能。
nda-review
Reviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Page 9 of 12 · 201 results