Agent-Skills.md

Agent Skills: Roadmap Communicator

>

[roadmapcommunicationprdnow-next-laterthemesboardcustomer]
product-teamID: borghei/claude-skills/roadmap-communicator

Repository

borghei/claude-skills
borgheiLicense: NOASSERTION
34669

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/HEAD/product-team/roadmap-communicator

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for roadmap-communicator.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

product-team/roadmap-communicator/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
roadmap-communicator
Description
>

Roadmap Communicator

A skill focused on communicating the roadmap — different audiences need different formats and confidence levels. Distinct from product-strategist (which builds the strategy) and agile-product-owner (which manages sprint execution).

When to use this skill

  • Preparing a roadmap readout for execs, board, customers, or sales
  • Translating a single internal roadmap to multiple audience formats
  • Auditing roadmap commitments for over-promise risk
  • Building a now-next-later view of priorities
  • Communicating roadmap changes to stakeholders
  • Preparing a what-changed/what's-next memo

Inputs the advisor expects

  • The internal roadmap (themes, initiatives, target dates, confidence)
  • Target audience(s) for the communication
  • Recent roadmap changes (added, removed, slipped)
  • Cross-functional commitments (engineering, sales, marketing)

Clarify First

Before generating the roadmap communication, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • [ ] Target audience — board/exec, customer, sales, or engineering (selects the audience-format matrix row and granularity)
  • [ ] Confidence band per item — commit, plan, aspire, or strategic intent (drives the language and over-promise guardrails)
  • [ ] Recent changes — what was added, removed, or slipped since the last readout (drives the what-changed diff memo)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.

Workflows

Workflow 1 — Translate roadmap for a specific audience

  1. Capture the master roadmap with confidence bands.
  2. Run roadmap_audience_translator.py with target audience.
  3. Review the audience-specific output; tune language.
python3 roadmap-communicator/scripts/roadmap_audience_translator.py \
  --input roadmap.json --audience customer --format markdown

Workflow 2 — Apply confidence bands to commitments

  1. List proposed roadmap items.
  2. Run confidence_band_generator.py with team velocity history + estimation context.
  3. Adjust item commitments based on output (commit / aspire / explore).
python3 roadmap-communicator/scripts/confidence_band_generator.py \
  --input items.json --format markdown

Workflow 3 — Generate a roadmap diff report

  1. Capture previous roadmap snapshot + current roadmap.
  2. Run roadmap_diff_reporter.py to produce what-changed memo.
python3 roadmap-communicator/scripts/roadmap_diff_reporter.py \
  --previous roadmap_q1.json --current roadmap_q2.json --format markdown

Decision frameworks

Audience-format matrix

| Audience | Right format | Wrong format | |----------|--------------|--------------| | Board / exec | Themes + bets + KPIs (1 page) | Feature list | | Customers / public | What's new + what's next (themes; no dates) | Internal commit list | | Sales | Themes + competitive positioning + customer-ask coverage | Engineering jargon | | Engineering | Themes + quarter commitments + scoped detail | Vague aspirations | | Internal company | Themes + progress + asks | Confidential strategy | | Partner / integrator | API-relevant changes + breaking-change calendar | All-up roadmap |

Same roadmap; different formats. Don't send the engineering commit list to customers.

Confidence bands

Apply per item:

| Band | Language | Audience expectation | |------|----------|----------------------| | Commit | "Will ship" with target date | Hold us to this | | Plan | "Plan to ship" with target window | Confident but conditional | | Aspire | "Investigating" / "Exploring" | Don't depend on this | | Strategic intent | "We believe X matters" | Direction, not deliverable |

Common errors:

  • Treating "plan" as "commit" — sets up disappointment
  • Communicating "commit" as "plan" — under-delivers excitement
  • No confidence band — every line read as commit

Now-next-later structure

A useful skeleton across audiences:

  • Now (in progress, < 1 quarter): commit-level items
  • Next (1-2 quarters out): plan-level items
  • Later (2-4 quarters): aspire-level items
  • Strategic intent (>4 quarters): direction only

This protects confidence: the closer in time, the firmer the commitment.

Themes vs features

Communicate at the right granularity:

  • External / strategic: themes ("better collaboration")
  • Customer-specific: outcomes ("you'll be able to X")
  • Internal: features + tickets

Telling a customer "we're adding X in Q3" makes a commitment that may not be precise enough. Telling the team "we're going to improve collaboration somehow" is too vague.

Common engagements

"Help me write the customer roadmap section"

  1. Start with what they care about (outcomes, not features).
  2. Use themes + outcomes; avoid specific dates beyond the current quarter.
  3. Group: launching soon, in development, exploring.
  4. Avoid: features that depend on uncertain technical bets.
  5. Always include a "we'd love your input" hook.

"Help me prep the board roadmap section"

  1. Start with strategic themes (3-5).
  2. For each theme: what's shipped, what's coming, what's the bet.
  3. Tie to business outcomes (NRR impact, new revenue, cost saving).
  4. Surface 1-2 strategic risks transparently.
  5. End with 2-3 specific asks.

"Our customer is asking 'when will X ship?'"

  1. First check: is X actually committed? (Probably plan or aspire.)
  2. If commit: give a target window with caveats.
  3. If plan: "We're planning to ship in [window]; we'll know more by [date]."
  4. If aspire: "We're exploring; not in our committed roadmap."
  5. Document the customer asks; feed them back into prioritization.

Anti-patterns to avoid

  • One-size-fits-all roadmap. Different audiences get over- or under-served.
  • Date-only roadmap. Dates without confidence bands set up over-promise.
  • Public commitments engineering didn't sign off on. Trust breaks.
  • Roadmap that never changes. Reality changes; roadmap must.
  • Roadmap silence between updates. Customers / sales speculate.
  • Hiding strategic risks. Boards prefer honest risks over surprise misses.
  • Big bang annual roadmap with no quarterly delta. Misses change cycles.
  • Feature names instead of outcomes. "Notifications v2" tells the customer nothing.

References

  • references/roadmap-communication-patterns.md — format catalog + when to use
  • references/audience-specific-formats.md — per-audience templates
  • references/now-next-later-and-themes.md — structural patterns

Related skills

  • product-team/product-strategist — strategy upstream of roadmap
  • product-team/agile-product-owner — sprint-level execution
  • product-team/product-manager-toolkit — broader PM tooling
  • c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor — CPO partnership
  • c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor — CEO / board alignment
  • business-growth/customer-success-manager — customer comms
  • marketing/ skills — external messaging alignment