Agent Skills: research-compare

Compare two or more alternatives in a structured tradeoff matrix — libraries, technologies, vendors, or approaches. Derives the comparison criteria from the decision context (or accepts caller-supplied criteria), researches each alternative on every criterion in parallel tracks across the hide-the-intent boundary, and builds an evidence-backed matrix where each cell carries a citation. Surfaces per-criterion tradeoffs factually (on X, A leads; on Y, B leads) but does NOT compute weighted scores or declare a winner — which weights matter, and which alternative wins, belongs to the orchestrator. Persists the matrix as a decision-input document. Mode-aware: interactive confirms criteria and reviews the matrix; autonomous returns the matrix path. The right capability for 'Postgres vs Cassandra for our workload', 'Stripe vs Adyen', 'REST vs GraphQL for this API'.

UncategorizedID: malhashemi/dotfiles/research-compare

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/malhashemi/dotfiles/tree/HEAD/dot_config/opencode/skill/research-compare

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for research-compare.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

dot_config/opencode/skill/research-compare/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
research-compare
Description
"Compare two or more alternatives in a structured tradeoff matrix — libraries, technologies, vendors, or approaches. Derives the comparison criteria from the decision context (or accepts caller-supplied criteria), researches each alternative on every criterion in parallel tracks across the hide-the-intent boundary, and builds an evidence-backed matrix where each cell carries a citation. Surfaces per-criterion tradeoffs factually (on X, A leads; on Y, B leads) but does NOT compute weighted scores or declare a winner — which weights matter, and which alternative wins, belongs to the orchestrator. Persists the matrix as a decision-input document. Mode-aware: interactive confirms criteria and reviews the matrix; autonomous returns the matrix path. The right capability for 'Postgres vs Cassandra for our workload', 'Stripe vs Adyen', 'REST vs GraphQL for this API'."
<workflow-engine id="vera-workflow-engine-v2.0" name="Execute Workflow"> <objective>Execute workflow by following instructions and producing output</objective> <llm critical="true"> <mandate>Always read COMPLETE files - NEVER use offset/limit when reading any workflow related files</mandate> <mandate>Instructions are MANDATORY - either as file path, steps or embedded list in YAML, XML or markdown</mandate> <mandate>Execute ALL steps in instructions IN EXACT ORDER</mandate> <mandate>Save to template output file after EVERY "template-output" tag</mandate> <mandate>NEVER skip a step - YOU are responsible for every step's execution without fail or excuse</mandate> </llm> <WORKFLOW-RULES critical="true"> <rule n="1">Steps execute in exact numerical order (1, 2, 3...) unless an explicit goto directs otherwise</rule> <rule n="2">Optional steps: Ask user unless YOLO mode active</rule> <rule n="3">Template-output tags: Save content, discuss with the user the section completed, and NEVER proceed until the user indicates to proceed (unless YOLO mode has been activated)</rule> </WORKFLOW-RULES> <flow> <step n="1" title="Process Each Instruction Step in Order"> <iterate>For each step in instructions:</iterate>
  <substep n="1a" title="Track Progress">
    <action if="first iteration">Create todo list from all instruction step titles (TodoWrite)</action>
    <action>Mark current step as in_progress (TodoWrite)</action>
  </substep>

  <substep n="1b" title="Handle Step Attributes">
    <check>If optional="true" and NOT YOLO -> Use Question tool to ask user whether to include (Yes/Skip)</check>
    <check>If if="condition" -> Evaluate condition</check>
    <check>If for-each="item" -> Repeat step for each item</check>
    <check>If repeat="n" -> Repeat step n times</check>
  </substep>

  <substep n="1c" title="Execute Step Content">
    <action>Process step instructions (markdown or XML tags)</action>
    <action>Replace {{variables}} with values (ask user if unknown)</action>
    <execute-tags>
      <tag>action -> Perform the action</tag>
      <tag>action type="script" -> Execute as shell command, capture output</tag>
      <tag>check if="condition" -> Conditional block wrapping actions (requires closing &lt;/check&gt;)</tag>
      <tag>ask -> Prompt user using Question tool and WAIT for response. When options exist, present them as selectable choices. For open-ended questions, provide helpful suggested options with custom input enabled</tag>
      <tag>invoke-skill name="skill-name" -> Execute another skill via OpenCode skill system</tag>
      <tag>invoke-agent name="subagent" prompt="task" -> Delegate to subagent via Task tool</tag>
      <tag>goto step="x" -> Jump to specified step (used for explicit loop-back in Q-R style flows)</tag>
    </execute-tags>
  </substep>

  <substep n="1d" title="Handle template-output Tags">
    <if tag="template-output">
      <mandate>Generate content for this section</mandate>
      <mandate>Save to file (Write first time, Edit subsequent)</mandate>
      <action>Display generated content</action>
      <action>Use Question tool to present checkpoint options. WAIT for response.
        <options>
          <option label="Continue" description="Approve this section and move to the next step" />
          <option label="Advanced Elicitation" description="Explore this section deeper before proceeding" />
          <option label="YOLO" description="Auto-complete the rest of this workflow without stopping" />
        </options>
        <if response="Advanced Elicitation">
          <action>Invoke advanced-elicitation skill</action>
        </if>
        <if response="Continue">
          <action>Continue to next step</action>
        </if>
        <if response="YOLO">
          <action>Enter YOLO mode for the rest of the workflow</action>
        </if>
      </action>
    </if>
  </substep>

  <substep n="1e" title="Step Completion">
    <action>Mark current step as completed (TodoWrite)</action>
    <check>If no special tags and NOT YOLO:</check>
    <action>Use Question tool to ask:
      <options>
        <option label="Continue" description="Proceed to the next step" />
        <option label="Edit" description="Revise this step before moving on" />
      </options>
    </action>
  </substep>
</step>

<step n="2" title="Completion">
  <check>Confirm all instruction steps have been executed</check>
  <output>Workflow complete.</output>
</step>
</flow> <execution-modes> <mode name="normal">Full user interaction and confirmation of EVERY step at EVERY template output - NO EXCEPTIONS except YOLO mode</mode> <mode name="yolo">Skip all confirmations and elicitation, minimize prompts and try to produce all of the workflow automatically by simulating the remaining discussions with a simulated expert user</mode> </execution-modes> <supported-tags desc="Instructions can use these tags"> <structural> <tag>step n="X" goal="..." - Define step with number and goal</tag> <tag>substep n="Xa" title="..." - Sub-step within a step</tag> <tag>phase n="X" - Phase within a substep</tag> <tag>optional="true" - Step can be skipped</tag> <tag>if="condition" - Conditional execution</tag> <tag>for-each="collection" - Iterate over items</tag> <tag>repeat="n" - Repeat n times</tag> </structural> <execution> <tag>action - Required action to perform</tag> <tag>action type="script" - Execute shell command</tag> <tag>action if="condition" - Single conditional action (inline, no closing tag needed)</tag> <tag>check if="condition"&gt;...&lt;/check&gt; - Conditional block wrapping multiple items (closing tag required)</tag> <tag>ask - Get user input via Question tool (ALWAYS wait for response before continuing). Present defined options as selectable choices. For open-ended questions, offer helpful suggestions with custom input enabled</tag> <tag>goto - Jump to another step (explicit loop-back)</tag> <tag>invoke-skill - Call another skill</tag> <tag>invoke-agent - Delegate to subagent via Task tool</tag> <tag>invoke-protocol - Execute a reusable protocol (e.g., discover_inputs)</tag> </execution> <output> <tag>template-output - Save content checkpoint</tag> <tag>critical - Cannot be skipped</tag> <tag>example - Show example output</tag> <tag>note - Informational content</tag> <tag>output - Display to user without saving</tag> </output> <validation> <tag>halt-conditions - Define conditions that MUST stop execution</tag> <tag>condition - Single halt condition</tag> <tag>validation - Pre-condition rules to check</tag> </validation> </supported-tags> <llm final="true"> <critical-rules> - This is the complete workflow execution engine - You MUST follow instructions exactly as written - This workflow uses INTENT-DRIVEN PLANNING - adapt organically to product type and context - YOU ARE FACILITATING A CONVERSATION with a user to produce a final document step by step - The whole process is meant to be collaborative - helping the user flesh out their ideas - Do not rush or optimize and skip any section </critical-rules> </llm> </workflow-engine> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <skill id="research-compare" name="Research Compare" version="1.0"> <overview> <purpose> Compare alternatives in a structured tradeoff matrix. Derive the criteria, research each alternative on every criterion in parallel, build an evidence-backed grid, surface per-criterion tradeoffs — without declaring a winner. Persist as a decision-input document. </purpose>
<inputs>
  Interactive (user invokes [CM]):
  - Two or more alternatives to compare; criteria proposed and
    confirmed; mentioned sources read first.

  Autonomous (dispatched from a workflow):
  - alternatives (required): array of two or more to compare
  - criteria (optional): comparison dimensions; derived from context
    when absent
  - decision_context (optional): what the comparison informs, used to
    derive criteria
  - web_search_approved (boolean): required true for external
    alternatives researched via web-search-researcher
  - output_location (optional): override for the research directory
</inputs>

<outputs>
  A tradeoff matrix persisted to the thoughts research directory:
  alternatives × criteria grid with an evidence-backed, cited cell
  per pairing; per-criterion tradeoff notes; a Summary stating the
  shape of the tradeoff — but no weighted score and no declared
  winner. Autonomous mode returns a structured signal carrying the
  matrix path.
</outputs>

<key-discipline>
  No winner. A comparison matrix tempts toward "and the best is" —
  that is a recommendation, and which alternative wins depends on
  weights the orchestrator owns. State per-criterion tradeoffs
  factually and the overall shape of the tradeoff; do NOT compute a
  weighted total or declare a choice.

  Evidence per cell. Every cell carries a citation. An uncited cell
  is an impression, not a comparison. "Could not determine" is a
  valid, honest cell.

  Hide-the-intent: every child prompt carries the alternative + the
  criteria to assess — never the parent task's intent or which
  alternative is hoped to win.
</key-discipline>
</overview> <workflow>
<step n="1" title="Orient">
  <action>Load and execute: references/steps/step-01-orient.xml</action>
</step>

<step n="2" title="Derive Criteria">
  <action>Load and execute: references/steps/step-02-derive-criteria.xml</action>
</step>

<step n="3" title="Dispatch per-Alternative Research">
  <action>Load and execute: references/steps/step-03-dispatch-research.xml</action>
</step>

<step n="4" title="Build Matrix">
  <action>Load and execute: references/steps/step-04-build-matrix.xml</action>
</step>

<step n="5" title="Persist">
  <action>Load and execute: references/steps/step-05-persist.xml</action>
</step>

<step n="6" title="Return">
  <action>Load and execute: references/steps/step-06-return.xml</action>
</step>
</workflow> <completion> <action> After step 6, the matrix is persisted and the caller has the path. In interactive mode, offer to deepen the research on a specific alternative (Focused Study) or investigate the decision more broadly (Comprehensive Investigation). </action> </completion> </skill>