Agent Skills: Hypothesis Driven 80/20

Build hypothesis-driven workplans with explicit 80/20 prioritization. Use when rapid decision-making requires testing assumptions, ranking opportunities, and focusing on highest-leverage analyses.

UncategorizedID: santos-sanz/lifeskills/consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/santos-sanz/lifeskills/tree/HEAD/skills/consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

skills/consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20
Description
Build hypothesis-driven workplans with explicit 80/20 prioritization. Use when rapid decision-making requires testing assumptions, ranking opportunities, and focusing on highest-leverage analyses.

Hypothesis Driven 80/20

Use $ARGUMENTS as initial context.

When to use this skill

  • Ambiguous problems that need fast direction before full analysis.
  • Prioritizing limited team capacity across competing hypotheses.
  • Designing a test plan with clear stop or continue criteria.
  • Converting broad strategic questions into measurable experiments.

When not to use this skill

  • Do not use it to create a broad issue tree, a market inventory, or a portfolio allocation without a testable decision question.
  • Do not label opinions as hypotheses when no measurable disconfirming signal is possible.

Required inputs

  • Governing business question and target metric.
  • Time horizon and decision deadline.
  • Data constraints and available analysis bandwidth.
  • Current baseline, unit of analysis, and minimum reliable signal.

Workflow

  1. Define one decision question and explicit success metric.
  2. Generate 3-7 falsifiable hypotheses using strict format.
  3. For each hypothesis define expected signal, disconfirming signal, kill threshold, and measurement window.
  4. Score hypotheses with 80/20 lens: impact, confidence, effort, speed.
  5. Select top 1-2 hypotheses for minimum viable tests.
  6. Build workplan with owners, deadlines, and decision checkpoints.

Ask-first questions

Ask up to 3 questions before ranking hypotheses:

  1. Which single metric determines decision success?
  2. What is the latest acceptable date for a go or no-go decision?
  3. Which datasets are trusted and immediately accessible?

Assumption policy

  • If critical data is unavailable, proceed with transparent assumptions.
  • Annotate each assumption with confidence and validation action.
  • Avoid merged hypotheses; keep one causal chain per hypothesis.
  • Record data quality, sample limitations, and the test's decision relevance.

Output contract

Always produce these sections in order:

  1. Context
  2. Decision or Recommendation
  3. Analysis
  4. Risks
  5. Next Actions
  6. Assumptions
  • Every test includes an owner, due date, success signal, and decision checkpoint.
  • Label evidence as Fact, Inference, Assumption, or Unknown.

Guardrails

  • Hypotheses must follow: "If X, then Y, because Z.".
  • Avoid descriptive statements that cannot be disproven.
  • Include both confirming and disconfirming signals.
  • Stop low-value analysis once kill threshold is reached.
  • Do not use false precision when the data cannot support a numeric threshold.

Handoffs

  • Use consulting-issue-tree-mece when the causal structure is still unclear.
  • Use decision-analysis-under-uncertainty when several tested options must be compared.
  • Use execution-operating-system when experiments become a sustained delivery program.

Resources

  • references/hypothesis-design.md - Falsifiability rules and signal design.
  • references/80-20-prioritization.md - Scoring and sequencing framework.
  • templates/hypothesis-plan.md - Decision-ready hypothesis template.
  • examples/hypothesis-example.md - Golden example with incomplete inputs.

Keywords

hypothesis driven, 80/20, falsifiable hypothesis, prioritization, test plan, consulting