Agent Skills: Rubric Writer

Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report.

UncategorizedID: willoscar/research-units-pipeline-skills/rubric-writer

Install this agent skill to your local

pnpm dlx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/HEAD/.codex/skills/rubric-writer

Skill Files

Browse the full folder contents for rubric-writer.

Download Skill

Loading file tree…

.codex/skills/rubric-writer/SKILL.md

Skill Metadata

Name
rubric-writer
Description
"Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report."

Rubric Writer

Triggers & routing

  • Trigger: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md.
  • Use when: paper-review pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 output/CLAIMS.md + output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md(以及可选 novelty matrix)。

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.

Inputs

Required:

  • output/CLAIMS.md
  • output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md

Optional:

  • output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
  • DECISIONS.md

Output

  • output/REVIEW.md

Contract

The review must expose stable sections:

  • ### Summary
  • ### Novelty
  • ### Soundness
  • ### Clarity
  • ### Impact
  • ### Major Concerns
  • ### Minor Comments
  • ### Recommendation

Every major concern must cite its claim_id or gap_id. This is the traceability interface consumed by the paper-review scorecard.

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

  • read prior review artifacts
  • render the stable rubric sections
  • keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

Acceptance

  • output/REVIEW.md exists
  • includes all stable rubric sections
  • recommendation is explicit

Non-goals

  • deep manuscript parsing
  • novelty retrieval
  • writing an author rebuttal