code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
reviewing-code
Get code review from Codex AI for implementation quality, bug detection, and best practices. Use when asked to review code, check for bugs, find security issues, or get feedback on implementation patterns.
code-reviewer
コードレビューとベストプラクティスの提案を行うスキル
resolve-pr-comments
Resolve bot review comments (CodeRabbit, Copilot, Gemini) on GitHub PRs using subagents. Use when: (1) User asks to 'review PR comments' or 'resolve PR comments', (2) User says 'work through PR N comments' or 'handle bot comments', (3) Need to triage CodeRabbit/Copilot/Gemini review comments, (4) Processing PR feedback at scale, (5) Want to see what's already fixed vs still pending. NOT for: creating PRs, reviewing code yourself, writing new reviews. Triggers: review PR comments, resolve PR comments, work through PR comments, handle bot comments, process CodeRabbit comments, triage PR feedback, fix PR review issues, resolve bot comments, pr comment resolver.
code-review
コードレビューを実施するためのスキル。ユーザーがコードの品質、セキュリティ、テスト、パフォーマンス、アーキテクチャの観点からコードレビューを依頼した場合に使用します。「コードレビュー」「コードをチェック」「PRをレビュー」「このコードを確認して」などのコードレビュータスクに言及した場合にトリガーします。セキュリティ脆弱性、ロジックエラー、テスト品質、パフォーマンス問題を優先順位付けして指摘し、具体的な改善提案を行います。
gemini-cli
Wield Google's Gemini CLI as a powerful auxiliary tool for code generation, review, analysis, and web research. Use when tasks benefit from a second AI perspective, current web information via Google Search, codebase architecture analysis, or parallel code generation. Also use when user explicitly requests Gemini operations.
review-code
Review code against spec compliance - checks implementation matches spec requirements, identifies deviations, reports compliance score, triggers evolution if needed
github-pr-resolver
Automate GitHub pull request review resolution by processing ALL review comments and fixing ALL failing CI checks. Use when: (1) A PR has review comments that need to be addressed and resolved, (2) CI/CD checks are failing and need fixes, (3) You want to process all PR feedback and mark conversations as resolved, (4) You need to iterate on PR feedback quickly. IMPORTANT: This skill processes EVERY comment - no skipping allowed. Always fetches fresh data from GitHub. The only acceptable end state is zero unresolved threads. COMMIT CADENCE: Each thread gets its own commit (fix → commit → resolve → next). Never batch commits at the end.
finishing-a-development-branch
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by verifying work is complete (tests, requirements, code review, TDD compliance) and presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
implement
Autonomously implement tasks from specs, plans, or issues using subagents with TDD and code review
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements - dispatches code-review subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
code-review
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
gemini-cli
Google Gemini CLI orchestration for AI-assisted development. Capabilities: second opinion/cross-validation, real-time web search (Google Search), codebase architecture analysis, parallel code generation, code review from different perspective. Actions: query, search, analyze, generate, review with Gemini. Keywords: Gemini CLI, second opinion, cross-validation, Google Search, web research, current information, parallel AI, code review, architecture analysis, gemini prompt, AI comparison, real-time search, alternative perspective, code generation. Use when: needing second AI opinion, searching current web information, analyzing codebase architecture, generating code in parallel, getting alternative code review, researching current events/docs.
consulting-agents
Use when you need information you don't have, expertise outside your comfort zone, or fresh eyes on code - dispatches agents to research, advise, or review. NOT for implementation delegation (see subagent-driven-development).
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements - dispatches superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
code-quality-workflow
Use when assessing or improving code quality, maintainability, performance, or security hygiene - provides workflows for analysis, code review, and systematic improvements with validation steps.
Page 2 of 10 · 173 results