code-review-assistant
|
code-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check for bugs", "security review", "review my changes", "find issues in this code", "review the diff", or asks for pull request review or code audit.
oracle-codex
This skill should be used when the user asks to "use Codex", "ask Codex", "consult Codex", "Codex review", "use GPT for planning", "ask GPT to review", "get GPT's opinion", "what does GPT think", "second opinion on code", "consult the oracle", "ask the oracle", or mentions using an AI oracle for planning or code review. NOT for implementation tasks.
ui
Generates UI components and feedback forms. Use when user mentions コンポーネント, component, UI, ヒーロー, hero, フォーム, form, フィードバック, feedback, 問い合わせ. Do NOT load for: 認証機能, バックエンド実装, データベース操作, ビジネスロジック.
codex-code-reviewer
Systematic code review workflow using zen mcp's codex tool. Use this skill when the user explicitly requests "use codex to check the code", "check if the recently generated code has any issues", or "check the code after each generation". The skill performs iterative review cycles - checking code quality, presenting issues to the user for approval, applying fixes, and re-checking until no issues remain or maximum iterations (5) are reached.
sudocode
ALWAYS use this skill for ALL sudocode spec and issue operations. Use when user mentions "spec", "issue", "ready", "blocked", "implement", "feature", "plan", or "feedback" with sudocode specs and issues. PROACTIVELY use at start of implementation tasks to check ready issues and understand work context. Operations include viewing (show_spec, show_issue, list_issues, list_specs), creating/modifying (upsert_spec, upsert_issue), planning features, breaking down work, creating dependency graphs, and providing implementation feedback.
Critical Peer Personality
Professional, skeptical communication style. Never over-enthusiastic, verifies before agreeing, challenges constructively, proposes instead of asking preferences. Expert peer who coaches, not serves.
skill-review
|
doc-coauthoring
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
meeting-insights-analyzer
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
improve-skill
Analyze coding agent session transcripts to improve existing skills or create new ones. Use when asked to improve a skill based on a session, or extract a new skill from session history.
meeting-insights-analyzer
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
honesty
Behavioral guideline for providing brutally honest feedback. Use always - this skill defines core interaction expectations for code review and technical discussions.
Page 4 of 4 · 68 results