estimation-fermi
Decomposes complex unknowns into estimable components to produce rapid order-of-magnitude answers with bounded uncertainty. Use when making quick estimates (market sizing, resource planning, feasibility checks), bounding unknowns with upper/lower limits, sanity-checking strategic assumptions, or when user mentions Fermi estimation, back-of-envelope calculation, order of magnitude, ballpark estimate, or triangulation.
ethics-safety-impact
Guides structured identification of potential harms, benefits, and differential impacts across stakeholder groups for decisions affecting people. Covers stakeholder mapping, fairness evaluation, risk mitigation design, and monitoring. Use when decisions could affect groups differently, need to anticipate harms/benefits, assess fairness and safety, identify vulnerable populations, or when user mentions ethical review, impact assessment, differential harm, safety analysis, bias audit, or responsible AI/tech.
evaluation-rubrics
Designs structured scoring tools with explicit criteria, performance scales, and descriptors for consistent, transparent quality assessment. Use when need quality criteria and scoring scales to evaluate work consistently, compare alternatives objectively, set acceptance thresholds, reduce subjective bias, or when user mentions rubric, scoring criteria, quality standards, evaluation framework, inter-rater reliability, or grading/assessing work.
expected-value
Calculates probability-weighted averages of all possible outcomes to enable rational decisions under uncertainty. Covers scenario identification, probability estimation, payoff quantification, and risk-adjusted interpretation. Use when comparing risky options (investments, product bets, strategic choices), prioritizing projects by expected return, assessing whether to take a gamble, or when user mentions expected value, EV calculation, risk-adjusted return, probability-weighted outcomes, or decision tree.
facilitation-patterns
Provides structured formats and techniques for running productive group sessions, from standups to multi-day workshops. Covers format selection, agenda design, participation management, decision methods, and handling difficult dynamics. Use when running meetings, workshops, brainstorms, design sprints, retrospectives, or team decision-making sessions, or when user mentions facilitation, workshop design, meeting patterns, session planning, or effective collaboration.
financial-unit-economics
Analyzes profitability per customer, product, or transaction to determine business model viability and scalability. Covers CAC, LTV, contribution margin, cohort analysis, and growth-readiness assessment. Use when evaluating business model viability, validating startup metrics (CAC, LTV, payback period), making pricing decisions, comparing business models, or when user mentions unit economics, CAC/LTV ratio, contribution margin, customer profitability, or break-even analysis.
focus-timeboxing-8020
Combines Pareto prioritization (80/20), timeboxing, and deep work techniques to manage attention, eliminate context-switching, and maximize high-impact output. Use when managing time and attention, combating procrastination, prioritizing high-impact work, planning daily/weekly schedules, or when user mentions timeboxing, Pomodoro, deep work, 80/20 rule, Pareto principle, focus blocks, task batching, or energy management.
forecast-premortem
Stress-tests predictions by assuming failure and working backward to identify blind spots, tail risks, and overconfidence. Applies Gary Klein's premortem technique to probabilistic forecasting. Use when confidence is high (>80% or <20%), need to identify tail risks and unknown unknowns, want to widen overconfident intervals, or when user mentions premortem, backcasting, what could go wrong, stress test, or black swans.
grant-proposal-assistant
Guides creation and review of competitive grant proposals (NIH R01/R21/K, NSF, foundations) by applying reviewer-perspective thinking to ensure clear hypotheses, compelling significance, genuine innovation, and feasible approaches. Use when writing or reviewing grant proposals, crafting specific aims, drafting significance/innovation/approach sections, or when user mentions R01, R21, K-series, grant writing, proposal review, study section, or fundable hypothesis.
graphrag-evaluation
Evaluates GraphRAG systems across knowledge graph completeness, retrieval relevance, answer correctness, reasoning depth, and hallucination prevention. Provides structured evaluation frameworks, metric selection guidance, and testing protocols. Use when evaluating GraphRAG quality, benchmarking multi-step reasoning, measuring hallucination reduction, or when user mentions evaluate GraphRAG, quality metrics, answer correctness, test my GraphRAG, or measure RAG performance.
graphrag-system-design
Designs complete GraphRAG systems integrating graph databases, vector stores, orchestration frameworks, and LLM reasoning. Guides through pattern selection, technology stack decisions, integration pipeline design, and domain-specific customizations. Use when designing GraphRAG systems, choosing technology stacks for graph-augmented retrieval, combining Neo4j with LLM, using LangChain/LlamaIndex knowledge graphs, applying community detection for RAG, building hybrid symbol-vector pipelines, or deploying production or domain-specific GraphRAG.
heuristics-and-checklists
Provides practical frameworks for fast decision-making through mental shortcuts (heuristics) and systematic error prevention through structured checklists. Guides through designing effective heuristics, creating checklists for complex procedures, and recognizing when shortcuts lead to biases. Use when making decisions under time pressure or uncertainty, preventing errors in complex procedures, designing decision rules or checklists, simplifying complex choices, or when user mentions heuristics, rules of thumb, mental models, checklists, error prevention, cognitive biases, satisficing, or standard operating procedures.
hypotheticals-counterfactuals
Applies "what if" thinking to explore alternative scenarios, test assumptions, understand causal relationships, and prepare for uncertainty. Guides through counterfactual reasoning, scenario exploration, pre-mortem analysis, and stress testing decisions against alternative futures. Use when exploring alternative scenarios, testing assumptions through "what if" questions, understanding causal relationships, conducting pre-mortem analysis, stress testing decisions, or when user mentions counterfactuals, hypothetical scenarios, thought experiments, alternative futures, what-if analysis, or needs to challenge assumptions.
information-architecture
Organizes, structures, and labels content so users can find and manage information effectively. Guides through content audits, card sorting, taxonomy design, navigation structure, and tree testing validation. Use when organizing content for digital products, designing navigation systems, restructuring information hierarchies, improving findability, creating taxonomies or metadata schemas, or when users mention information architecture, IA, sitemap, navigation design, content structure, card sorting, tree testing, taxonomy, or findability.
kill-criteria-exit-ramps
Establishes pre-defined, objective conditions for stopping projects and specific decision points for continue/pivot/kill evaluations. Guides through defining kill criteria, setting go/no-go gates, avoiding sunk cost fallacy, and executing disciplined stopping decisions. Use when defining stopping rules for projects, avoiding sunk cost fallacy, setting objective exit criteria, deciding whether to continue/pivot/kill initiatives, or when users mention kill criteria, exit ramps, stopping rules, go/no-go decisions, project termination, or sunk costs.
knowledge-graph-construction
Designs and builds knowledge graphs from unstructured or semi-structured data sources. Guides through data model selection (LPG, RDF, hypergraph, temporal), schema design, entity/relation extraction pipelines, and layered architecture construction. Use when designing knowledge graphs, choosing between LPG vs RDF, planning entity extraction, designing graph schemas, aligning ontologies, building a KG for RAG, or when user mentions knowledge graph construction.
layered-reasoning
Structures thinking across multiple abstraction levels (30,000 ft strategic, 3,000 ft tactical, 300 ft operational) while maintaining consistency between layers. Guides through top-down decomposition, bottom-up aggregation, cross-layer translation, and constraint propagation. Use when reasoning across multiple abstraction levels, designing systems with hierarchical layers, explaining concepts at different depths, maintaining consistency between principles and implementation, or when users mention 30,000-foot view, layered thinking, abstraction levels, top-down design, or strategy-to-execution alignment.
mapping-visualization-scaffolds
Creates visual maps that make implicit relationships, dependencies, and structures explicit through diagrams, concept maps, and architectural blueprints. Guides through identifying nodes and relationships, choosing visualization approaches, and validating completeness. Use when complex systems need visual documentation, mapping component relationships and dependencies, creating hierarchies or taxonomies, documenting process flows or decision trees, understanding system architectures, visualizing data lineage or knowledge structures, or when user mentions concept maps, system diagrams, dependency mapping, relationship visualization, or architecture blueprints.
market-mechanics-betting
Translates beliefs (probabilities) into optimal actions (bet/pass/hedge) using quantitative frameworks including edge calculation, Kelly Criterion bet sizing, forecast extremizing, and Brier score optimization. Use when converting probabilities into decisions, calculating edge against market odds, sizing bets optimally, extremizing aggregated forecasts, improving Brier scores, or when user mentions betting strategy, Kelly Criterion, edge calculation, Brier score, extremizing, or translating belief into action.
memory-retrieval-learning
Creates evidence-based learning plans that maximize long-term retention through spaced repetition, retrieval practice, interleaving, and elaboration. Guides through goal definition, material breakdown, review scheduling, and progress tracking. Use when long-term knowledge retention is needed, studying for exams or certifications, learning new job skills or technology, mastering substantial material, combating forgetting, or when user mentions studying, memorizing, learning plans, spaced repetition, flashcards, active recall, or durable learning.
meta-prompt-engineering
Transforms vague or unreliable prompts into structured, constraint-aware prompts with explicit roles, task decomposition, output formats, and quality checks. Use when prompts produce inconsistent outputs, need explicit structure and constraints, require safety guardrails, involve multi-step reasoning that needs decomposition, need domain expertise encoding, or when user mentions improving prompts, prompt templates, structured prompts, prompt optimization, reliable AI outputs, or prompt patterns.
metrics-tree
Decomposes high-level North Star metrics into actionable sub-metrics and leading indicators, maps causal relationships between metric levels, and identifies high-impact experiments to move key metrics. Use when setting product North Star metrics, decomposing business metrics into drivers, mapping strategy to measurable outcomes, identifying which metrics to move through experimentation, understanding leading vs lagging indicators, prioritizing metric improvement opportunities, or when user mentions metric tree, metric decomposition, North Star metric, KPI breakdown, metric drivers, or how metrics connect.
model-equivariance-auditor
Verifies that implemented neural network models correctly respect their intended symmetries through systematic equivariance testing, layer-wise isolation, and gradient analysis. Use when testing model equivariance, debugging symmetry bugs, verifying implementation correctness, checking if a model is actually equivariant, or diagnosing why an equivariant model isn't working.
morphological-analysis-triz
Explores solution spaces systematically through morphological analysis (parameter-option matrices) and resolves technical contradictions using TRIZ inventive principles to generate novel, non-obvious solutions. Use when exploring all feasible design alternatives before prototyping, resolving technical contradictions (speed vs precision, strength vs weight, cost vs quality), generating novel product configurations, finding inventive solutions to engineering problems, identifying patent opportunities, or when user mentions morphological analysis, Zwicky box, TRIZ, inventive principles, systematic innovation, or design space exploration.
negative-contrastive-framing
Defines concepts, quality criteria, and boundaries by showing what they are NOT -- using anti-goals, near-miss examples, and failure patterns to create crisp decision criteria where positive definitions alone are ambiguous. Use when clarifying fuzzy boundaries, defining quality criteria, teaching by counterexample, preventing common mistakes, setting design guardrails, disambiguating similar concepts, refining requirements through anti-patterns, or when user mentions near-miss examples, anti-goals, what not to do, negative examples, counterexamples, or boundary clarification.
negotiation-alignment-governance
Creates explicit stakeholder alignment through negotiated working agreements, clear decision rights (RACI/DACI/RAPID), and conflict resolution protocols. Use when stakeholders need aligned working agreements, resolving decision authority ambiguity, navigating cross-functional conflicts, establishing governance frameworks, negotiating resource allocation, defining escalation paths, creating team norms, mediating trade-off disputes, or when user mentions stakeholder alignment, decision rights, working agreements, conflict resolution, governance model, or consensus building.
one-pager-prd
Creates concise, decision-ready product specifications (one-pagers and PRDs) that align stakeholders on problem, solution, users, success metrics, and constraints. Use when proposing new features/products, documenting product requirements, creating concise specs for stakeholder alignment, pitching initiatives, scoping projects before detailed design, capturing user stories and success metrics, or when user mentions one-pager, PRD, product spec, feature proposal, product requirements, or brief.
portfolio-roadmapping-bets
Creates strategic portfolio roadmaps that size and sequence initiative bets across time horizons (H1/H2/H3), balance risk profiles (core/adjacent/transformational), and set clear exit/scale criteria for disciplined resource allocation. Use when managing multiple initiatives across time horizons, balancing risk vs return across portfolio, sizing and sequencing bets with dependencies, setting exit/scale criteria for experiments, allocating resources across innovation types, or when user mentions portfolio planning, roadmap horizons, betting framework, initiative prioritization, innovation portfolio, or resource allocation across horizons.
postmortem
Conducts blameless postmortems that transform failures into learning opportunities by documenting timelines, quantifying impact, performing root cause analysis (5 Whys, fishbone diagrams), and defining corrective actions with owners and deadlines. Use when analyzing failures, outages, incidents, or negative outcomes, conducting blameless postmortems, identifying corrective actions, learning from near-misses, establishing prevention strategies, or when user mentions postmortem, incident review, failure analysis, RCA, lessons learned, or after-action review.
prioritization-effort-impact
Transforms overwhelming backlogs into clear, actionable priorities by mapping items on a 2x2 effort-vs-impact matrix, identifying quick wins (high impact, low effort), big bets, time sinks, and fill-ins. Use when ranking backlogs, deciding what to do first, prioritizing feature roadmaps, triaging bugs or technical debt, allocating resources across initiatives, identifying low-hanging fruit, evaluating strategic options, or when user mentions prioritization, quick wins, effort-impact matrix, high-impact low-effort, big bets, or "what should we do first?".
project-risk-register
Identifies, assesses, and prioritizes project risks using probability-times-impact scoring (risk matrix), then assigns owners, mitigation plans, contingencies, and triggers to track risk evolution over the project lifecycle. Use when managing project uncertainty, building a risk register, conducting risk assessments, defining risk mitigation plans, or when user mentions risk register, risk management, probability-impact matrix, or asks "what could go wrong with this project?".
prototyping-pretotyping
Guides validation of ideas before full development using pretotyping (fake doors, concierge MVPs, Wizard of Oz) and prototyping at appropriate fidelity (paper, clickable, coded) to test assumptions about demand, pricing, and feasibility. Use when testing ideas cheaply before building, choosing prototype fidelity, running experiments to validate assumptions, or when user mentions prototype, MVP, fake door test, concierge, Wizard of Oz, landing page test, smoke test, or asks "how can we validate this idea before building?".
reference-class-forecasting
Anchors predictions in historical reality by identifying a class of similar past events and using their statistical frequency as a baseline (outside view) before analyzing case-specific details. Use when starting a forecast, establishing base rates, testing "this time is different" claims, or when user mentions reference classes, outside view, base rates, or starting a new prediction.
research-claim-map
Systematically evaluates claims by triangulating sources, rating evidence quality (primary/secondary/tertiary), assessing source credibility, and reaching confidence-rated conclusions to prevent confirmation bias and reliance on unreliable sources. Use when verifying claims before decisions, fact-checking statements, conducting due diligence, evaluating conflicting evidence, or when user mentions "fact-check", "verify this", "is this true", "evaluate sources", "conflicting evidence", or "due diligence".
retrieval-search-orchestration
Designs retrieval strategies for querying knowledge graphs in RAG systems, covering pattern selection (global-first, local-first, U-shaped hybrid), query decomposition for multi-hop reasoning, ranking and constraint configuration, and provenance tracking for citation. Use when designing retrieval pipelines, orchestrating search over knowledge graphs, or when user mentions retrieval strategy, search orchestration, query decomposition, multi-hop reasoning, provenance tracking, or citation in GraphRAG.
reviews-retros-reflection
Facilitates structured team reflection through retrospectives, post-mortems, after-action reviews, and weekly/quarterly reviews, producing root cause analysis and SMART action items with psychological safety. Use when conducting sprint retrospectives, project post-mortems, weekly reviews, quarterly reflections, after-action reviews (AARs), or when user mentions "retro", "retrospective", "what went well", "lessons learned", "reflection", or "how can we improve".
roadmap-backcast
Plans backward from a fixed goal or deadline to the present, identifying required milestones, dependencies, critical path, and feasibility constraints to transform aspirational targets into actionable sequenced plans. Use when planning with fixed deadlines, working backward from future goals, mapping critical path, or when user mentions "backcast", "work backward from", "reverse planning", "we need to launch by", "target date is", or "what needs to happen to reach".
role-switch
Analyzes decisions from multiple stakeholder perspectives (engineering, product, legal, finance, users) to uncover blind spots, surface tensions, and synthesize alignment paths with explicit tradeoffs. Use when stakeholders have conflicting priorities, need to pressure-test proposals, build cross-functional empathy, or when user mentions "what would X think", "stakeholder alignment", "see from their perspective", "blind spots", or "conflicting interests".
scientific-clarity-checker
Reviews scientific documents for logical clarity, argument soundness, and rigor by auditing hypothesis-data alignment, claim-evidence chains, quantitative precision, hedging calibration, and terminology consistency across any document type. Use when reviewing scientific argumentation, checking claims vs evidence, auditing terminology, or when user mentions check clarity, review logic, scientific soundness, hypothesis-data alignment, or claims vs evidence.
scientific-email-polishing
Composes and polishes professional scientific correspondence -- emails to collaborators, journal cover letters, and responses to peer reviewers -- ensuring clear communication, appropriate tone, explicit asks, and professional formatting for academic contexts. Use when writing or polishing scientific emails, cover letters to editors, reviewer responses, or when user mentions email to collaborator, cover letter to journal, reviewer response, or professional scientific correspondence.
scientific-manuscript-review
Guides systematic multi-pass review and editing of scientific manuscripts (research articles, reviews, perspectives) to improve clarity, structure, scientific rigor, and reader comprehension. Use when reviewing or editing research manuscripts, journal articles, or perspectives, when user mentions manuscript, paper draft, article, research writing, journal submission, reviewer feedback, or needs to improve scientific writing.
scout-mindset-bias-check
Detects and removes cognitive biases from reasoning using Julia Galef's Scout Mindset framework. Provides reversal tests, scope sensitivity checks, status quo bias tests, confidence interval audits, and full bias audits. Use when a prediction feels emotional, stuck at 50/50, or when validating forecasting process. Use when user mentions scout mindset, soldier mindset, bias check, reversal test, scope sensitivity, or cognitive distortions.
security-threat-model
Systematically identifies vulnerabilities, threats, and mitigations for systems handling sensitive data using STRIDE methodology, trust boundary mapping, and defense-in-depth principles. Use when designing or reviewing systems with PII/PHI/financial/auth data, building security-sensitive features (auth, payments, file uploads, APIs), preparing for audits or compliance (PCI, HIPAA, SOC 2), investigating incidents, or integrating third-party services. Use when user mentions threat model, STRIDE, trust boundaries, attack surface, or security review.
skill-creator
Transforms documents containing theoretical knowledge or frameworks (PDFs, markdown, book notes, research papers, methodology guides) into actionable, reusable Claude Code skills using systematic reading methodology. Use when user mentions "create a skill from this document", "turn this into a skill", "extract a skill from this file", or when analyzing documents with methodologies, frameworks, or processes that could be made actionable.
socratic-teaching-scaffolds
Guides learners to discover knowledge through strategic Socratic questioning and progressive scaffolding removal. Combines question ladders, misconception detectors, Feynman explanations, and worked-example fading to build durable understanding. Use when teaching complex concepts, correcting misconceptions, onboarding team members, mentoring problem-solving, or designing self-paced learning. Use when user mentions "teach me", "help me understand", "explain like I'm", "learning path", "guided discovery", or "Socratic method".
stakeholders-org-design
Provides frameworks for mapping stakeholder influence networks, designing team structures aligned with system architecture (Conway's Law), defining team interface contracts (APIs, SLAs, decision rights), and assessing capability maturity (DORA, CMMC, agile models). Use when designing org structure or team topologies, mapping stakeholders for change initiatives, defining team interfaces, assessing capability maturity, planning restructures, or when user mentions org design, team structure, stakeholder map, Conway's Law, or RACI.
strategy-and-competitive-analysis
Develops business strategies grounded in rigorous competitive and market analysis using proven frameworks (Good Strategy kernel, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, Blue Ocean, Playing to Win, Value Chain Analysis, BCG Matrix). Use when developing strategy (market entry, product launch, expansion, M&A, turnaround), conducting competitive analysis, making strategic decisions (build vs buy, pricing, positioning), planning strategic initiatives, or when user mentions strategy, competitive analysis, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, market positioning, or strategic frameworks.
symmetry-discovery-questionnaire
Guides collaborative discovery of hidden symmetries in ML data through structured domain analysis, coordinate system examination, transformation testing, and physical constraint identification. No group theory knowledge required. Use when ML engineers need to identify symmetries in their data, when user mentions data symmetry, invariance discovery, what transformations matter, or needs help recognizing patterns their model should respect.
symmetry-group-identifier
Maps identified symmetries to mathematical groups (cyclic, dihedral, symmetric, SO(3), SE(3), E(3)) for equivariant neural network architecture design, using taxonomy and foundations from Visual Group Theory. Use when candidate symmetries have been identified and need formalization into group theory language, or when user mentions cyclic groups, dihedral groups, Lie groups, SO(3), SE(3), or permutation groups.
symmetry-validation-suite
Provides empirical test protocols and metrics to validate whether hypothesized symmetries actually hold in data or models before committing to equivariant architecture. Includes invariance/equivariance testing, group structure verification, and distribution analysis under transforms. Use when testing invariance, validating equivariance, checking symmetry assumptions, debugging symmetry-related model failures, or needing data-driven validation before architecture decisions.
Page 513 of 1699 · 84919 results
