luna
Use whenever working with `mizchi/luna` in the luna.mbt repo — writing CSR examples, fixing reactivity bugs (effects re-running on unrelated signal changes), adding new luna features, or onboarding to luna's mental model. This is the unified entry point; pick the right reference page below for the specific situation.
playwright-pnpm-workspace
Use when running Playwright tests in this repo (luna.mbt) and either the test fails to discover specs ("did not expect test.describe()" / "two different versions of @playwright/test") or you're adding a new playwright config under astra/ or sol/. Captures the version-skew between root and per-package @playwright/test pins.
sol-bootstrap
Use when running `sol new` for the first time, when `sol <subcommand>` fails with `failed to resolve path mizchi/sol/cmd/sol_js` / `Run this command inside a MoonBit project that depends on mizchi/sol.`, or when moving from `sol dev` to `sol build` / `sol serve` for the first time. Covers (a) the bootstrap rules — `sol new <name> --user <ns>` works in an empty directory as of sol 0.22.2, but `--cloudflare` / `--doc` / `--dev` still need a host moon project, and every non-new subcommand needs `.mooncakes/mizchi/sol/` locally (= `moon install` after `sol new`) — (b) the sol 0.22.x scaffold layout (`app/server/routes.mbt` holds routes + page handlers; `app/layout/` is a separate package; `/` and `/about` are pre-registered) and (c) the production flow gotchas (`sol build` writes to two directories, `sol serve` does NOT rebuild, dev & prod both default to :7777).
sol-cloudflare-deploy
Use when deploying sol_app (or any sol-built MoonBit SSR worker) to Cloudflare Workers, debugging error 10021, or extending sol/examples/sol_app/scripts/patch-cloudflare-globals.mjs. Captures the global-scope I/O traps in MoonBit core + sol's generated bundle and the wrangler ASSETS binding URL layout.
research-to-diagram
深度调研主题并自动生成知识关系图谱PDF。接收研究主题后自动进行网络调研、信息收集、知识整理，最终生成专业的可视化关系图谱。适用于"研究...并做图"、"深度分析...并可视化"、"生成知识图谱"等场景。
design-style
|
design-system-analyzer
Analyze any website's UI style using ChromeDevTools to extract precise CSS tokens, animations, and interaction states. Handles complex sites and anti-bot measures by guiding the user. Triggers on "analyze this site", "extract UI style", "create design system from [URL]", or "learn visual style".
canvas-accessibility-auditor
Accessibility audit and remediation for Canvas LMS courses. Scans content for WCAG violations, generates prioritized reports, guides fixes, and verifies remediation. Use when asked to "audit accessibility", "check WCAG compliance", "fix accessibility issues", or "run accessibility review".
canvas-bulk-grading
Bulk grading workflows for Canvas LMS assignments using rubrics. Covers single grading, batch grading, and code execution strategies with safety-first dry runs.
canvas-course-builder
Scaffold complete Canvas LMS course structures from specs, templates, or existing courses. Creates modules, pages, assignments, and discussions in bulk. Use when asked to "build a course", "scaffold modules", "create course structure", "set up a new course", or "copy course structure".
canvas-course-qc
Learning designer quality check for Canvas LMS courses. Audits module structure, content completeness, publishing state, date consistency, and rubric coverage. Use when asked to "QC a course", "is this course ready", "pre-semester check", or "quality review".
canvas-discussion-facilitator
Discussion forum facilitator for Canvas LMS. Helps students and educators browse, read, reply to, and create discussion posts. Trigger phrases include "discussion posts", "reply to students", "check discussions", "forum participation", "post a discussion", or any discussion-related Canvas task.
canvas-morning-check
Educator morning course health check for Canvas LMS. Shows submission rates, struggling students, grade distribution, and upcoming deadlines. Trigger phrases include "morning check", "course status", "how are my students", or any start-of-day teaching review.
canvas-peer-review-manager
Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.
canvas-week-plan
Student weekly assignment planner for Canvas LMS. Shows all due dates, submission status, grades, and peer reviews across all courses. Use when a student says "what's due", "plan my week", "weekly check", or wants to organize their coursework.
documentation-structure
Documentation architecture for this repository. Use when creating, updating, or reviewing README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, or docs/ files. Covers separation of concerns, vendor documentation standards, cross-references, and validation.
miro-code-explain-on-board
Use when the user wants to explain or visualize a codebase on a Miro board — produces a minimal, notation-correct set of architecture / structure / behavior diagrams (flowchart, UML class, UML sequence, ERD) plus a short companion document, grounded in real repo artifacts.
miro-code-review
Use when the user wants to create a visual code review on a Miro board from a pull/merge request (GitHub, GitLab, or any forge), local uncommitted changes, or a branch comparison — produces a file-changes table, summary/architecture/security docs, and architecture diagrams, then links them back from the PR/MR.
miro-code-spec
Use when the user wants to extract a Miro board's specs (documents, diagrams, prototypes, tables, frames, images) to local `.miro/specs/` files for AI-assisted planning and implementation — accepts a board URL or single-item URL.
skills-development
Use when authoring or revising plugin SKILL.md files in this repo. Captures the principles for keeping skills as compact shortcuts to MCP tool groups.
abstraction-concrete-examples
Builds structured abstraction ladders that translate high-level principles into concrete, actionable examples across 3-5 levels. Bridges communication gaps, reveals hidden assumptions, and tests whether abstract ideas work in practice. Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps.
academic-letter-architect
Guides the creation of evidence-based academic recommendation letters, reference letters, and award nominations that combine concrete examples, meaningful comparisons, and genuine enthusiasm. Use when writing recommendation letters for students, postdocs, or colleagues, or when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy and comparative statements.
adr-architecture
Documents significant architectural and technical decisions with full context, alternatives considered, trade-offs analyzed, and consequences understood. Creates a decision trail that helps teams understand why decisions were made. Use when choosing between technology options, making infrastructure decisions, establishing standards, migrating systems, or when user mentions ADR, architecture decision, technical decision record, or decision documentation.
alignment-values-north-star
Creates actionable alignment frameworks that give teams a shared North Star (direction), values (guardrails), and decision tenets (behavioral standards). Enables autonomous decision-making while maintaining organizational coherence. Use when starting new teams, scaling organizations, defining culture, establishing product vision, resolving misalignment, creating strategic clarity, or when user mentions North Star, team values, mission, principles, guardrails, decision framework, or cultural alignment.
bayesian-reasoning-calibration
Applies Bayesian reasoning to systematically update probability estimates with new evidence, helping make better forecasts and avoid overconfidence. Use when making predictions or judgments under uncertainty, forecasting outcomes, evaluating probabilities, testing hypotheses, calibrating confidence, assessing risks with uncertain data, or when user mentions priors, likelihoods, Bayes theorem, probability updates, forecasting, calibration, or belief revision.
brainstorm-diverge-converge
Applies structured divergent-convergent thinking to generate many creative options, organize them into meaningful clusters, then systematically evaluate and narrow to the strongest choices. Balances creative exploration with disciplined decision-making. Use when exploring product ideas, solving open-ended problems, generating strategic alternatives, developing research questions, designing experiments, or when user mentions brainstorming, ideation, divergent thinking, generating options, or evaluating alternatives.
career-document-architect
Guides the creation of career documents for academic advancement including research statements, teaching statements, diversity statements, CVs, and biosketches. Combines strategic positioning, narrative coherence, and institutional alignment with authentic representation of contributions and vision. Use when writing or reviewing faculty applications, fellowship statements, promotion packages, award applications, or when user mentions research statement, teaching philosophy, diversity statement, biosketch, academic CV, or career narrative.
causal-inference-root-cause
Systematically investigates causal relationships to identify true root causes rather than correlations or symptoms. Distinguishes genuine causation from spurious associations, tests competing explanations, and designs interventions addressing underlying drivers. Use when investigating why something happened, debugging systems, analyzing failures, evaluating policy impacts, or when user mentions root cause, causal chain, confounding, spurious correlation, or asks "why did this really happen?"
chain-estimation-decision-storytelling
Chains estimation, decision analysis, and storytelling to transform uncertain choices into clear, stakeholder-ready recommendations. Quantifies uncertain variables, applies expected value analysis to identify the best option, then packages the analysis into a persuasive narrative. Use when evaluating strategic options (build vs buy, market entry, resource allocation), quantifying tradeoffs, justifying investments, pitching to decision-makers, or when user mentions ROI analysis, expected value, business case, cost-benefit, or needs to combine estimation with persuasive communication.
chain-roleplay-debate-synthesis
Facilitates structured roleplay, debate, and synthesis to resolve decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions. Surfaces assumptions that single-viewpoint analysis would miss and integrates competing priorities into coherent recommendations. Use when stakeholders have competing priorities (growth vs. sustainability, speed vs. quality), need to pressure-test ideas from different angles, explore tradeoffs between incompatible values, or synthesize conflicting expert opinions into coherent strategy.
chain-spec-risk-metrics
Chains together clear specifications, proactive risk analysis (premortem/register), and measurable success metrics into a comprehensive planning artifact for high-stakes initiatives. Use when planning migrations, launches, or strategic changes that need implementation roadmaps, risk mitigation, and instrumentation. Invoke when user mentions "plan this migration", "launch strategy", "implementation roadmap", "what could go wrong", "how do we measure success", or when high-impact decisions need comprehensive planning.
chef-assistant
Guides cooking through culinary principles, food science, and flavor architecture rather than rote recipe steps. Covers technique teaching (knife skills, sauces, searing, braising), food science (Maillard reaction, emulsions, brining), flavor troubleshooting (salt/acid/fat/heat balance), menu planning, ingredient substitutions, plating, and cultural cuisine exploration. Use when users mention cooking, recipes, chef, cuisine, flavor, technique, plating, food science, seasoning, or culinary questions.
code-data-analysis-scaffolds
Generates structured scaffolds (frameworks, checklists, templates) for technical work — TDD test suites, exploratory data analysis plans, statistical analysis designs, causal vs predictive modeling objectives, and validation checklists. Use when starting technical work that needs systematic planning before execution. Invoke when user mentions "write tests for", "explore this dataset", "analyze", "model", "validate", "design an A/B test", or when technical work needs scaffolding before execution.
cognitive-design
Grounds visual design decisions in cognitive psychology principles — perception, attention, memory, Gestalt grouping, and visual encoding hierarchy — explaining WHY certain designs work. Covers interfaces, data visualizations, educational content, and presentations. Invoke when user mentions cognitive load, visual hierarchy, working memory, preattentive processing, Gestalt principles, encoding hierarchy, or cognitive design pyramid. For design evaluation, use `design-evaluation-audit`. For fallacy prevention, use `cognitive-fallacies-guard`. For data storytelling, use `visual-storytelling-design`.
cognitive-fallacies-guard
Detects and prevents visual misleads, cognitive biases, and data integrity violations in visualizations, dashboards, reports, and presentations. Audits charts for honesty, diagnoses misinterpretation causes, and provides specific fixes. Invoke when user mentions chartjunk, misleading chart, truncated axis, data integrity, visual deception, 3D chart problems, cherry-picking data, or needs to audit visualizations for accuracy. For general design evaluation, use `design-evaluation-audit`. For cognitive foundations, use `cognitive-design`.
communication-storytelling
Transforms analysis, data, and complex information into clear, persuasive narratives tailored to specific audiences — executives, customers, investors, or non-technical stakeholders. Provides story structures (Hero's Journey, Problem-Solution-Benefit, Situation-Complication-Resolution) and audience adaptation techniques. Use when presenting findings, explaining technical concepts to non-technical audiences, writing announcements, or when user mentions "write this for", "explain to", "present findings", "make this compelling", or "audience is".
constraint-based-creativity
Turns limitations into creative fuel by strategically imposing constraints that force novel thinking, break habitual patterns, and reveal unexpected solutions. Covers resource constraints (budget/time/tools), format constraints (length/medium), rule-based constraints, and perspective constraints. Use when brainstorming feels stuck or generates obvious ideas, working with limited resources, designing with specific limitations, or when user mentions "think outside the box", "we're stuck", "same old ideas", "tight constraints", or "limited budget/time".
d3-visualization
Guides creation of custom, interactive data visualizations with D3.js — bar/line/scatter charts, network diagrams, geographic maps, hierarchies, and real-time data updates with zoom/pan/brush interactions and animated transitions. Use when chart libraries (Highcharts, Chart.js) lack the customization needed and you require low-level control over data-driven DOM manipulation, scales, shapes, and layouts. Invoke when user mentions D3, d3.js, custom visualization, force-directed graph, or data-driven SVG.
data-schema-knowledge-modeling
Creates rigorous, validated models of entities, relationships, and constraints for database schemas (SQL, NoSQL, graph), knowledge graphs, ontologies, API data models, and taxonomies. Covers relational, document, graph, event/time-series, and dimensional schema patterns with lifecycle modeling, soft deletes, polymorphic associations, and hierarchies. Use when user mentions "schema", "data model", "entities", "relationships", "ontology", "knowledge graph", or when data structures need formalization.
decision-matrix
Compares multiple named alternatives against weighted criteria to produce transparent, defensible choices with explicit trade-off analysis. Covers criterion identification, weighting approaches (direct allocation, pairwise comparison, stakeholder averaging), scoring calibration, sensitivity analysis, and group decision facilitation. Use when choosing between vendors/tools/strategies, balancing competing priorities (cost vs quality vs speed), or when user mentions "which option should we choose", "compare alternatives", "evaluate vendors", or "trade-offs".
decomposition-reconstruction
Breaks complex systems into atomic components, maps their relationships, and reconstructs them in optimized configurations to identify bottlenecks, critical failure points, and redesign opportunities. Use when dealing with complex systems that need simplification, identifying bottlenecks or critical failure points, redesigning architecture or processes for better performance, breaking down problems that feel overwhelming, analyzing dependencies to understand ripple effects, or when optimization requires understanding how parts interact.
deliberation-debate-red-teaming
Challenges plans, designs, and decisions from multiple adversarial perspectives to surface blind spots, hidden assumptions, and vulnerabilities before they cause real damage. Use when testing plans or decisions for blind spots, need adversarial review before launch, validating strategy against worst-case scenarios, building consensus through structured debate, identifying attack vectors or vulnerabilities, or when groupthink or confirmation bias may be hiding risks.
design-evaluation-audit
Systematically evaluates existing designs against cognitive science principles using repeatable checklists, scoring rubrics, and severity-classified fix recommendations. Use when conducting design reviews or critiques, evaluating designs for cognitive alignment, performing quality assurance before launch, diagnosing usability issues, or choosing between design alternatives with objective criteria.
design-of-experiments
Generates structured experimental designs (factorial, response surface, Taguchi) to systematically discover how multiple factors affect outcomes while minimizing experimental runs. Use when optimizing multi-factor systems with limited experimental budget, screening many variables to find the vital few, discovering interactions between parameters, mapping response surfaces for peak performance, validating robustness to noise factors, or when users mention factorial designs, A/B/n testing, parameter tuning, or process optimization.
dialectical-mapping-steelmanning
Applies thesis-antithesis-synthesis reasoning to escape false binary choices by steelmanning opposing positions, mapping their underlying principles and tradeoffs, and synthesizing principled third-way resolutions. Use when debates are trapped in false dichotomies, polarized positions need charitable interpretation, tradeoffs are obscured by binary framing, synthesis beyond "pick one side" is needed, or when users mention steelman arguments, Hegelian dialectic, or resolving seemingly opposed principles.
discovery-interviews-surveys
Designs structured interview guides, survey instruments, and JTBD probes to learn from users while avoiding common research biases (leading questions, confirmation bias, selection bias). Use when validating product assumptions before building, discovering unmet user needs, understanding customer problems and workflows, testing concepts or positioning, researching target markets, identifying jobs-to-be-done and hiring triggers, or uncovering pain points and workarounds.
domain-research-health-science
Guides clinical and health science research through PICOT question formulation, evidence hierarchy assessment, bias evaluation (Cochrane RoB 2, ROBINS-I), outcome prioritization, and GRADE certainty rating. Use when formulating clinical research questions, evaluating health evidence quality, prioritizing patient-important outcomes, conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, creating evidence summaries for guidelines, or assessing regulatory evidence.
embedding-fusion-strategy
Designs embedding strategies that combine semantic (text-based) and structural (graph-based) information at node, edge, path, and subgraph levels for knowledge graphs. Use when selecting embedding granularity, choosing complementary semantic and structural approaches, designing fusion strategies (concatenation, attention, contrastive alignment), or when user mentions node embeddings, embedding fusion, vector representations for graphs, or combining text and graph signals.
environmental-scanning-foresight
Monitors external trends across PESTLE dimensions, detects weak signals of emerging change, develops scenario-based futures, and sets adaptive signposts for early warning. Use when scanning external trends for strategic planning, detecting early indicators of change, planning scenarios for multiple futures, setting signposts and indicators for early warning, or when user mentions environmental scanning, horizon scanning, trend analysis, scenario planning, strategic foresight, or futures thinking.
equivariant-architecture-designer
Designs neural network architectures that respect validated symmetry groups, recommending architecture families (G-CNN, steerable CNN, e3nn), layer patterns, and implementation libraries. Use when you have validated symmetry groups and need equivariant architecture design, or when user mentions equivariant layers, G-CNN, e3nn, steerable networks, or building symmetry into a model.
Page 512 of 1699 · 84919 results
